Writing and maintaining GitHub issues

Standards for issues in tldraw/tldraw.

Title standards

• Sentence case - Capitalize only the first word and proper nouns

• No type prefixes - Use GitHub issue types, not Bug: , Feature: , [Bug] , etc.

• Imperative mood for enhancements - "Add padding option" not "Adding padding option"

• Descriptive for bugs - Describe the symptom: "Arrow bindings break with rotated shapes"

• Specific - Readable without opening the issue body

Good titles

• Arrow bindings break with rotated shapes

• Add padding option to zoomToFit method

• Pinch zoom resets selection on Safari

Bad titles

• Bug: arrow bug (prefix, vague)

• [Feature] Add new feature (prefix, vague)

• Not working (vague)

Title cleanup transformations

• Remove prefixes: Bug: X → X

• Fix capitalization: Add Padding Option → Add padding option

• Use imperative: Adding feature X → Add feature X

• Be specific: Problem → [Describe the actual problem]

• Translate non-English titles to English

Issue types

Set via the GitHub GraphQL API after creating the issue (the --type flag is not reliably supported):

Type Use for

Bug

Something isn't working as expected

Feature

New capability or improvement

Example

Request for a new SDK example

Task

Internal task or chore

Labels

Use sparingly (1-2 per issue) for metadata, not categorization.

Common labels

Label Use for

good first issue

Well-scoped issues for newcomers

More Info Needed

Requires additional information

sdk

Affects the tldraw SDK

dotcom

Related to tldraw.com

a11y

Accessibility

performance

Performance improvement

api

API change

Automation labels (do not apply manually)

keep , stale , update-snapshots , publish-packages , major , minor , skip-release , deploy triggers

Issue body standards

Bug reports

• Clear description of what's wrong

• Steps to reproduce

• Expected vs actual behavior

• Environment details (browser, OS, version) when relevant

• Screenshots/recordings when applicable

Feature requests

• Problem statement - What problem does this solve?

• Proposed solution - How should it work?

• Alternatives considered

• Use cases

Example requests

• What API/pattern to demonstrate

• Why it's useful

• Suggested approach

• Which example category it belongs to

Triage workflow

New issues

• Verify sufficient information to act on

• Set appropriate issue type

• Clean up title if needed

• Add More Info Needed label and comment if details missing

• Add good first issue if appropriate

Stale issues

• Review if still relevant

• Close if no longer applicable

• Add keep label if should remain open

• Request updates if waiting on information

Important

• Never include "Generated with Claude Code" unless the PR directly relates to Claude Code

• Never use title case for descriptions - use sentence case