research-orchestrator

Research Orchestrator

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "research-orchestrator" with this command: npx skills add tendtoyj/tendtoyj-claude-skills/tendtoyj-tendtoyj-claude-skills-research-orchestrator

Research Orchestrator

Diagnose your research needs, build the optimal skill chain, and guide execution step by step. No external tools — pure routing. Reads research-memory/ status to recommend what to run and when.

Purpose

Research Orchestrator is the traffic controller for all 8 research skills. It answers:

  • What research do I need right now?

  • What's already done, and what's missing?

  • In what order should I run the skills?

  • What's stale and needs refreshing?

This skill never conducts research itself. It reads research-memory/ to diagnose the current state, analyzes the user's request, and produces a step-by-step execution plan pointing to the right skills.

"Doing research without a plan is like shopping without a list — you'll miss what matters and waste time on what doesn't."

Modes

Mode When to Use Behavior

A: Full Research New brand/product, empty research-memory/ Chain all 8 skills in dependency order

B: Focused Research Specific question or area needed Select 1-3 skills based on request

C: Refresh Existing research is outdated Re-run stale skills in Refresh mode

D: Validate Strategy brief exists, need expert check Run expert-validator only

Auto-Load Protocol

On every invocation, BEFORE any routing:

  • Check research-memory/ directory

  • If files exist → Read ALL .md files (except README.md)

  • For each file, assess:

  • Exists? — File present with substantive content (not just scaffold headers)

  • Last updated — Extract date from > Last updated: header or research-log.md

  • Richness — Rich (detailed data) / Adequate / Thin (scaffold only)

  • Enrichment status — For competitive-intel.md : which skills have contributed? ([competitor-finder] / [competitor-analyzer] / [competitor-visual] )

  • Expert validation — For strategy-brief.md : are [expert-validator] sections populated?

  • Read research-log.md → Extract last execution date per skill

  • Check brand-memory/ (read-only) → If exists, use business context to pre-fill recommendations

  • Build Status Dashboard (see Step 1 below)

Process

Step 1: Build Status Dashboard

Goal: Show the user exactly where their research stands.

Generate this dashboard from the Auto-Load data:

Research Status Dashboard ══════════════════════════ 📊 Market Landscape : [STATUS] [DATE_INFO] 🏢 Competitive Intel : [STATUS] [DATE_INFO] [ENRICHMENT_INFO] 👥 Customer Insight : [STATUS] [DATE_INFO] 💬 Customer Language : [STATUS] [DATE_INFO] 📋 Strategy Brief : [STATUS] [DATE_INFO] [VALIDATION_INFO] 📝 Research Log : [LAST_ENTRY_DATE]

Status values:

  • ✅ Complete — File exists with substantive content

  • ⚠️ Stale (Xd ago) — Complete but outdated (30+ days)

  • ⚠️ Partial — File exists but missing sections (e.g., competitive-intel with finder only)

  • ❌ Missing — File doesn't exist or is empty scaffold

Staleness thresholds:

  • 30+ days → "Update recommended"

  • 90+ days → "Update strongly recommended"

  • 180+ days → "Re-research needed"

Always show the dashboard first — it grounds the conversation in facts, not assumptions.

Step 2: Analyze Request + Select Mode

Goal: Match the user's request to the right mode.

Condition Auto-Suggest

research-memory/ empty or missing + broad request Mode A: Full Research

research-memory/ empty + specific area mentioned Mode B: Focused (but recommend Full)

research-memory/ has data + specific area mentioned Mode B: Focused

research-memory/ has data + "update"/"refresh"/"renew" Mode C: Refresh

strategy-brief.md exists + "validate"/"review"/"check" Mode D: Validate

Ambiguous request Show dashboard → ask user to choose

Present the suggested mode with a one-line rationale. Let the user confirm or override.

Step 3: Build Execution Path

Goal: Generate the ordered list of skills to run, respecting dependencies.

Skill Dependency Map

market-scanner ─────────────────────────────────────┐ → market-landscape.md │ │ competitor-finder ──┬── competitor-analyzer │ → competitive- │ → enriches messaging/CTA ├─→ research-synthesizer intel.md │ │ → strategy-brief.md (skeleton) └── competitor-visual │ │ → enriches design/visual │ ▼ │ expert-validator audience-profiler ──── voice-of-customer │ → enriches strategy → customer- → customer-language.md │ -brief.md insight.md │ │ ────────────────────────────────────┘

Group independence (for Mode A):

  • Group 1 (Market): market-scanner — no prerequisites

  • Group 2 (Competition): competitor-finder → competitor-analyzer → competitor-visual — sequential chain

  • Group 3 (Customer): audience-profiler → voice-of-customer — sequential chain

  • Group 4 (Synthesis): research-synthesizer → expert-validator — requires Groups 1+2+3

Groups 1, 2, 3 are independent of each other — user can choose the starting group.

Mode A: Full Research Path

Present the complete chain:

📋 Full Research Plan ═════════════════════ Group 1 — Market Step 1: market-scanner → market-landscape.md

Group 2 — Competition Step 2: competitor-finder → competitive-intel.md (skeleton) Step 3: competitor-analyzer → competitive-intel.md (+messaging) Step 4: competitor-visual → competitive-intel.md (+design)

Group 3 — Customer Step 5: audience-profiler → customer-insight.md Step 6: voice-of-customer → customer-language.md

Group 4 — Synthesis (after Groups 1-3) Step 7: research-synthesizer → strategy-brief.md Step 8: expert-validator → strategy-brief.md (+expert review)

💡 Groups 1-3 are independent. Which group would you like to start with?

Mode B: Focused Research Path

  • Map user request to target skill(s) using this table:

User Request Pattern Target Skill Prerequisite

Market size, trends, structure market-scanner None

Find competitors, competitive set competitor-finder None

Competitor website, messaging, pricing competitor-analyzer competitor-finder ✅

Competitor design, visual, screenshots competitor-visual competitor-finder ✅

Target audience, segments, journey audience-profiler None

Customer language, reviews, community voice-of-customer audience-profiler recommended

Strategy brief, cross-analysis, synthesis research-synthesizer market-scanner + competitor-finder + audience-profiler ✅

Expert review, validate strategy expert-validator research-synthesizer ✅

  • Check prerequisites against dashboard status

  • If prerequisite missing → include it in the path

  • Present the focused path

Mode C: Refresh Path

  • Read research-log.md → calculate days since last run per skill

  • Identify stale skills (30/90/180-day thresholds)

  • Build refresh path — stale skills only, in dependency order

  • Cascade rule: If a data-producing skill refreshes, downstream synthesis may need refresh too:

  • market-landscape refreshed → flag research-synthesizer for refresh

  • competitive-intel refreshed → flag research-synthesizer for refresh

  • customer-insight refreshed → flag voice-of-customer + research-synthesizer for refresh

Mode D: Validate Path

  • Check strategy-brief.md exists with content

  • If YES → direct to expert-validator

  • If NO → explain prerequisite chain: research-synthesizer first (and its prerequisites if missing)

Step 4: Guide Execution

Goal: Hand off to the first skill and provide ongoing navigation.

Language: 사용자가 언어를 지정하면 대시보드 및 안내 텍스트를 해당 언어로 출력합니다. 개별 스킬 호출 시 동일한 언어 설정을 전달합니다.

Initial handoff:

▶ Next skill: [SKILL_NAME] Purpose: [one-line description] Input needed: [what the user should prepare]

Say "[SKILL_NAME] 실행해줘" to start.

After each skill completes:

Provide a transition prompt:

✅ [COMPLETED_SKILL] done → [output_file] saved

▶ Next: [NEXT_SKILL_NAME] Purpose: [one-line description]

Continue? Say "[NEXT_SKILL_NAME] 실행해줘"

After all research skills complete:

If strategy-brief.md exists with Next Steps → bridge to marketing execution:

🎯 Research complete! Your strategy brief recommends:

  1. [Next Step 1] → [marketing skill name]
  2. [Next Step 2] → [marketing skill name]
  3. [Next Step 3] → [marketing skill name]

Ready to execute? Pick a next step to start.

Skill Quick-Reference

Skill MCP Tool Output Time Est.

market-scanner Perplexity market-landscape.md 5-10 min

competitor-finder Perplexity competitive-intel.md (skeleton) 5-10 min

competitor-analyzer Firecrawl competitive-intel.md (+messaging) 10-15 min

competitor-visual Playwright competitive-intel.md (+design) 10-15 min

audience-profiler Perplexity customer-insight.md 5-10 min

voice-of-customer Perplexity customer-language.md 5-10 min

research-synthesizer None strategy-brief.md 5-10 min

expert-validator Task Agents strategy-brief.md (+expert) 10-15 min

Quality Checklist

Before presenting a research plan, verify:

  • Status Dashboard shown with accurate file states and dates

  • Mode selection has clear rationale tied to dashboard state + user request

  • Execution path respects all skill dependencies (no skill runs before its prerequisite)

  • Each step in the path names the skill, its output, and what the user needs to provide

  • Focused mode includes missing prerequisites in the path

  • Refresh mode uses staleness thresholds consistently (30/90/180 days)

  • Refresh cascade logic applied (upstream refresh → downstream re-synthesis flagged)

  • Post-completion bridge to marketing execution skills (when strategy-brief.md has Next Steps)

Example: Full Research (Abbreviated)

User: "우리 브랜드 리서치를 처음부터 해야 하는데"

Dashboard: 📊 Market Landscape: ❌ Missing · 🏢 Competitive Intel: ❌ Missing · 👥 Customer Insight: ❌ Missing · 💬 Customer Language: ❌ Missing · 📋 Strategy Brief: ❌ Missing

Mode: A — Full Research (research-memory/ is empty)

Plan: market-scanner → competitor-finder → competitor-analyzer → competitor-visual → audience-profiler → voice-of-customer → research-synthesizer → expert-validator

Next: market-scanner — "비즈니스/제품 설명을 알려주시면 시작합니다."

Example: Focused Research (Abbreviated)

User: "경쟁사 웹사이트 메시징을 좀 더 깊게 분석해줘"

Dashboard: 📊 Market Landscape: ✅ Complete (2025-01-15) · 🏢 Competitive Intel: ✅ Complete (2025-01-12) · ...

Mode: B — Focused (competitor-analyzer targets website messaging) Prerequisite: competitor-finder ✅ already complete

Plan: competitor-analyzer only Post-completion: "competitive-intel.md가 업데이트되었습니다. research-synthesizer로 전략 브리프도 갱신할까요?"

Example: Refresh (Abbreviated)

User: "3개월 전 리서치인데 업데이트 필요해"

Dashboard: 📊 Market Landscape: ⚠️ Stale (95d) · 🏢 Competitive Intel: ⚠️ Stale (92d) · 👥 Customer Insight: ⚠️ Stale (90d) · 💬 Customer Language: ✅ 45d · 📋 Strategy Brief: ⚠️ Stale (88d)

Mode: C — Refresh (3 files exceed 90-day threshold) Plan: market-scanner (Refresh) → competitor-finder (Refresh) → audience-profiler (Refresh) → research-synthesizer (Refresh) Cascade: Strategy brief refresh needed because 3 upstream sources refreshed.

What This Skill Does NOT Do

  • Conduct research → Use the individual research skills (market-scanner, competitor-finder, etc.)

  • Write to research-memory/ → Each skill writes its own output; this skill only reads

  • Execute marketing → Use execution skills (brand-voice, copy, SEO, email, etc.)

  • Replace skill selection judgment → It recommends; the user decides

Research Orchestrator stays focused on routing — diagnosing what's needed, building the path, and guiding execution.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Research

research-synthesizer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

keyword-research

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

post-writer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review