journal-selector

Suggest optimal academic venues for paper submission based on paper content, novelty level, and author's goals. Activated when Chopin asks 'which journal should I submit to', 'help me find the right venue', or shares a draft seeking publication advice. Input: paper draft, abstract, or key contributions. Output: ranked list of 5-8 suitable venues with fit score, rejection risk, review speed, and reasoning. Use when Chopin is deciding where to submit a paper or comparing venues.

Safety Notice

This listing is from the official public ClawHub registry. Review SKILL.md and referenced scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "journal-selector" with this command: npx skills add shaopanguo/journal-selector

Journal Selector

Match papers to the right venue — maximizing acceptance odds and impact.

Input Needed

Provide one or more of:

  • Full paper draft
  • Abstract
  • Key contributions list
  • Current submission status (new / revision / rejected)
  • Author preference: speed vs. prestige, theory vs. application, impact factor priority

Output: Venue Recommendations

For each suggested venue, provide:

FieldDescription
VenueFull name + abbreviation
Fit Score1-10, how well paper matches
Match ReasoningWhy this paper fits this venue
RiskReach / Safe / Safety
Review SpeedFast (3-6mo) / Medium (6-9mo) / Slow (9-18mo)
Impact FactorIf known
Key ConcernsWhat might cause rejection here
Strategy TipHow to position the paper for this venue

Risk Classification

  • Reach: Top-tier, low acceptance rate, high impact if accepted
  • Safe: Lower-tier, higher acceptance, less prestige
  • Safety: Almost certain acceptance, but limited impact

Review Speed Classification

  • Fast: Conferences (ICRA, CDC, ACC), some letters journals
  • Medium: IEEE TIE, TCST, Neurocomputing
  • Slow: IEEE TAC, Automatica, Springer journals

Venue Categories for Control/AI Research

Tier 1 — High Prestige, Low Acceptance

  • IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (TAC)
  • Automatica
  • International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR)

Tier 2 — Strong, Balanced

  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (TIE)
  • IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology (TCST)
  • IEEE Transactions on Robotics (TRO)
  • Systems & Control Letters
  • International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing

Tier 3 — Applied / Specialized

  • IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
  • Journal of the Franklin Institute
  • Asian Journal of Control
  • IET Control Theory & Applications

Tier 4 — Fast Conference Track

  • CDC (IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control)
  • ACC (American Control Conference)
  • ICRA (IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation)
  • IROS (IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems)
  • ECC (European Control Conference)

AI / Learning + Control

  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (TNNLS)
  • IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
  • Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence (PRAMI)

See references/venue-database.md for full venue profiles including IF, review speed, scope, and tips.

Decision Factors

  1. Paper's theory-to-application ratio — Pure theory → TAC/Automatica; Applied → TIE/TCST
  2. Novelty level — Incremental → Mid-tier; Breakthrough → Top-tier
  3. Author timeline — Need publication fast → Conference first; Can wait → Journal
  4. Target audience — Robotics community → ICRA/IROS; Control theory → CDC/ACC/TAC
  5. Revision history — Rejected from top? Suggest next-tier before re-review

Workflow

  1. Analyze paper: extract topic, method, contribution strength, application domain
  2. Map to venue categories (tier + type)
  3. Score fit for 8-12 candidate venues
  4. Select top 5-8 with varied risk levels
  5. Sort by fit score descending
  6. Include reach/safe/safety spread for author choice

Warning Signs

  • Paper is too theoretical for applied journal → expect desk rejection
  • Paper lacks experiments for IEEE Transactions → risky
  • Novelty is incremental but targeting top-tier → high rejection risk
  • Mixing control + learning communities without clear contribution to either → positioning problem

See references/venue-database.md for detailed venue profiles.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Research

Thinkdeep

Structured reasoning protocol for Claude — forces step-by-step analysis, self-critique, and confidence scoring before answering. Reduces wrong answers and ha...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
Research

Keep 健康记录

Use when users are stating or logging their own health data to Keep or Keep App rather than asking for advice, analysis, or general chat, including weight, b...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
Research

Workflow Tools

Work smarter with loop detection, parallel decisions, and file size analysis

Registry SourceRecently Updated
3550Profile unavailable
Research

gamer-news-skill

Fetch and summarize the latest video game news from major gaming outlets (IGN, Kotaku, GameSpot, Polygon, Eurogamer, Rock Paper Shotgun, VG247, Gematsu, Play...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
6870Profile unavailable