zoonk-github-issues

Create and manage GitHub issues with advanced features: issue types, dependencies, and sub-issues.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "zoonk-github-issues" with this command: npx skills add zoonk/zoonk/zoonk-zoonk-zoonk-github-issues

GitHub Issues Skill

Create and manage GitHub issues with advanced features: issue types, dependencies, and sub-issues.

For planning what issues to create, see zoonk-issue-planning.

Quick Start

Create a Basic Issue

gh issue create --title "Issue title" --body "Description"

Create Issue with Labels

gh issue create --title "Issue title" --body "Description"
--label "main:catalog"

Create Issue from File

gh issue create --title "Issue title" --body-file ./issue-body.md

Labels

Always Fetch Labels First

Before creating issues, check available labels to use existing ones or follow patterns for new ones:

gh label list --repo zoonk/zoonk

Naming Convention

Format: {prefix}:{feature}

Prefix groups with consistent colors:

Prefix Color Description

main:*

Blue (#1d76db) main app features

editor:*

Purple (#5319e7) editor app features

packages:*

Green (#0e8a16) packages

When to Create a New Label

Labels typically map to route groups (e.g., (catalog) , (settings) ), but the real question is:

"Can someone work independently on this feature without causing git conflicts?"

Guidelines:

  • One label per route group by default - e.g., main:settings covers all settings pages

  • Separate label if truly independent - e.g., main:home is separate from main:catalog even though home is within the catalog route group, because they don't share code

  • Keep connected features together - Course page and lesson page are both main:catalog because they're tightly coupled and would cause conflicts

Think of it in terms of teams/squads: if two agents could work on different parts simultaneously without stepping on each other's code, those might be separate labels.

Creating New Labels

When a new label is needed, use the same color as existing labels in that group:

gh label create "main:newfeature" --color "1d76db" gh label create "editor:newfeature" --color "5319e7" gh label create "packages:newpackage" --color "0e8a16"

Issue Types

Issue types help categorize issues (Epic, Bug, Task, Enhancement, etc.). This requires organization-level issue types to be enabled.

Get Available Issue Types

gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner: String!) { organization(login: $owner) { issueTypes(first: 20) { nodes { id name description } } } }' -f owner='zoonk'

Get Issue Node ID

Required for all GraphQL mutations:

gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $number: Int!) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { issue(number: $number) { id } } }' -f owner='zoonk' -f repo='zoonk' -F number=123

Set Issue Type

gh api graphql -f query=' mutation($issueId: ID!, $issueTypeId: ID!) { updateIssueIssueType(input: {issueId: $issueId, issueTypeId: $issueTypeId}) { issue { id title issueType { name } } } }' -f issueId="ISSUE_NODE_ID" -f issueTypeId="TYPE_NODE_ID"

Dependencies (Blocked-By)

Dependencies track when one issue blocks another. Use the REST API with database IDs (integers), not node IDs.

Get Issue Database ID

The REST API for dependencies requires the integer database ID, not the GraphQL node ID:

Get database ID for an issue

gh api repos/zoonk/zoonk/issues/123 --jq '.id'

Returns something like: 3858025102

Add Dependency (Issue A blocks Issue B)

First get the blocking issue's database ID, then use -F (uppercase) to pass it as an integer:

Get the blocking issue's database ID

BLOCKING_DB_ID=$(gh api repos/zoonk/zoonk/issues/BLOCKING_NUMBER --jq '.id')

Add dependency: BLOCKED_NUMBER is blocked by BLOCKING_NUMBER

gh api repos/zoonk/zoonk/issues/BLOCKED_NUMBER/dependencies/blocked_by
--method POST
-F issue_id=$BLOCKING_DB_ID

Important: Use -F (uppercase) not -f (lowercase). The -F flag passes the value as a raw integer, while -f passes it as a string which will cause a 422 error.

Verify Dependencies

gh api repos/zoonk/zoonk/issues/ISSUE_NUMBER --jq '.issue_dependencies_summary'

Returns: {"blocked_by":1,"blocking":0,"total_blocked_by":1,"total_blocking":0}

Remove Dependency

gh api repos/zoonk/zoonk/issues/BLOCKED_NUMBER/dependencies/blocked_by/BLOCKING_DB_ID
--method DELETE

Sub-Issues

Sub-issues create parent-child relationships, useful for breaking down epics.

Add Sub-Issue

gh api graphql -f query=' mutation($parentId: ID!, $childId: ID!) { addSubIssue(input: {issueId: $parentId, subIssueId: $childId}) { issue { title } subIssue { title } } }' -f parentId="PARENT_NODE_ID" -f childId="CHILD_NODE_ID"

Remove Sub-Issue

gh api graphql -f query=' mutation($parentId: ID!, $childId: ID!) { removeSubIssue(input: {issueId: $parentId, subIssueId: $childId}) { issue { title } subIssue { title } } }' -f parentId="PARENT_NODE_ID" -f childId="CHILD_NODE_ID"

List Sub-Issues

gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $number: Int!) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { issue(number: $number) { subIssues(first: 50) { nodes { number title state } } } } }' -f owner='zoonk' -f repo='zoonk' -F number=123

Common Workflows

Zoonk Feature Development Pattern

When developing a new feature at Zoonk, follow this pattern:

  • Create an Epic issue for the feature (use the Epic issue type)

  • Create Task issues for each implementation step

  • Link tasks as sub-issues of the epic

  • Set dependencies between tasks that have ordering requirements

Example workflow:

1. Create the epic

EPIC_URL=$(gh issue create --title "Feature: User Notifications"
--body "Implement notification system for users"
--label "main:notifications") EPIC_NUM=$(echo $EPIC_URL | grep -oE '[0-9]+$')

2. Get epic's node ID

EPIC_ID=$(gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $number: Int!) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { issue(number: $number) { id } } }' -f owner='zoonk' -f repo='zoonk' -F number=$EPIC_NUM
--jq '.data.repository.issue.id')

3. Create sub-tasks

TASK1_URL=$(gh issue create --title "Add notifications table"
--body "Create Prisma schema for notifications") TASK1_NUM=$(echo $TASK1_URL | grep -oE '[0-9]+$')

TASK2_URL=$(gh issue create --title "Add notification API endpoints"
--body "Create API routes for notification CRUD") TASK2_NUM=$(echo $TASK2_URL | grep -oE '[0-9]+$')

4. Get task node IDs

TASK1_ID=$(gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $number: Int!) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { issue(number: $number) { id } } }' -f owner='zoonk' -f repo='zoonk' -F number=$TASK1_NUM
--jq '.data.repository.issue.id')

TASK2_ID=$(gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $number: Int!) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { issue(number: $number) { id } } }' -f owner='zoonk' -f repo='zoonk' -F number=$TASK2_NUM
--jq '.data.repository.issue.id')

5. Link as sub-issues

gh api graphql -f query=' mutation($parentId: ID!, $childId: ID!) { addSubIssue(input: {issueId: $parentId, subIssueId: $childId}) { issue { title } } }' -f parentId="$EPIC_ID" -f childId="$TASK1_ID"

gh api graphql -f query=' mutation($parentId: ID!, $childId: ID!) { addSubIssue(input: {issueId: $parentId, subIssueId: $childId}) { issue { title } } }' -f parentId="$EPIC_ID" -f childId="$TASK2_ID"

6. Add dependency (Task 2 blocked by Task 1)

Note: Dependencies use database ID (integer), not node ID

TASK1_DB_ID=$(gh api repos/zoonk/zoonk/issues/$TASK1_NUM --jq '.id') gh api repos/zoonk/zoonk/issues/$TASK2_NUM/dependencies/blocked_by
--method POST -F issue_id=$TASK1_DB_ID

Get Issue Node ID Helper

Use this frequently, so here's a compact version:

get_issue_id() { gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $number: Int!) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { issue(number: $number) { id } } }' -f owner='zoonk' -f repo='zoonk' -F number=$1
--jq '.data.repository.issue.id' }

Usage: get_issue_id 123

Quick Reference

Action Command

Create issue gh issue create --title "..." --body "..."

Get issue node ID gh api graphql ... -F number=N --jq '.data.repository.issue.id'

List issue types gh api graphql ... organization(login: ...) { issueTypes ... }

Set issue type gh api graphql ... updateIssueIssueType(input: ...)

Add dependency gh api repos/.../issues/N/dependencies/blocked_by --method POST

Add sub-issue gh api graphql ... addSubIssue(input: ...)

List sub-issues gh api graphql ... issue(number: N) { subIssues ... }

Common Mistakes

  • Use GitHub sub-issues feature, which automatically lists sub-issues, no need to list all sub-issues manually in the issue body

  • Similarly, when we add issue dependencies, it automatically adds that dependency to the UI, so you don't need to add Parent: #ISSUE_NUMBER

  • GitHub already does that when you add the relationship

  • Plus, you shouldn't add references to our temporary files to the GitHub issue body like this: specs, see /tasks/specs/whatever . Instead write the full spec to the issue body

  • When you have multiple issues to add, you may want to create a temporary bash script to process them in batch instead of running each command individually

Never Trust #NUMBER References from Specs

When creating issues from specs:

Spec numbers are NOT GitHub issue numbers - A spec named 18-get-org-courses.md does NOT correspond to GitHub issue #18

Handle #NUMBER references carefully:

  • Remove "Blocked by: #X" lines entirely (use GitHub API instead)

  • For context references like "Out of scope, see #X":

  • If creating issues fresh: don't keep those spec references in the issue body, those are our internal spec numbers

  • If issue already exists: verify the GitHub issue number is correct first

Build a mapping as you create issues:

  • Track: Spec filename → GitHub issue number

  • Use this mapping to fix cross-references in issue bodies

Cross-references ARE okay when they're verified GitHub issues:

  • GOOD: "Out of scope, handled by #1234" (verified this is a real issue)

  • BAD: "See #18 for details" (spec number, not verified)

Content That Should NOT Be in Issue Bodies

Remove before creating (GitHub handles these automatically):

  • Blocked by: #X

  • Use GitHub blocked-by relationship

  • Type: Feature

  • Use GitHub issue type

  • Summary tables listing sub-issues - Use GitHub sub-issue feature

  • Numbered lists of child issues - Use GitHub sub-issue feature

  • Parent: #X

  • GitHub shows parent automatically

  • Don't add any metadata that GitHub manages or displays in the UI already, focus only on the task

Troubleshooting

"Resource not accessible by integration"

  • Ensure you have write access to the repository

  • Check that GitHub Issues is enabled for the repo

  • Verify your gh CLI is authenticated: gh auth status

"Issue type not found"

  • Issue types must be enabled at the organization level

  • Verify available types with the "Get Available Issue Types" query

  • Ensure you're using the node ID, not the type name

"Cannot add sub-issue"

  • Both issues must be in the same repository

  • The child issue cannot already have a parent

  • Circular references are not allowed

"GraphQL node ID invalid"

  • Node IDs are base64-encoded and version-specific

  • Always fetch fresh node IDs before mutations

  • Don't cache node IDs across sessions

"Invalid property /issue_id: is not of type integer" (HTTP 422)

  • The REST API for dependencies requires the database ID (integer), not the GraphQL node ID

  • Use -F (uppercase) to pass integers: -F issue_id=$DB_ID

  • Don't use -f (lowercase) which passes strings: -f issue_id="..." will fail

  • Get database ID with: gh api repos/zoonk/zoonk/issues/NUMBER --jq '.id'

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Open in GitHubOpen in ClawHub

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

zoonk-code-simplification

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
-17
zoonk
General

zoonk-translations

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
-40
zoonk
General

cache-components

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
-39
zoonk