qa-test-planner

A comprehensive skill for QA engineers to create test plans, generate manual test cases, build regression test suites, validate designs against Figma, and document bugs effectively.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "qa-test-planner" with this command: npx skills add zixun-github/aisdlc/zixun-github-aisdlc-qa-test-planner

QA Test Planner

A comprehensive skill for QA engineers to create test plans, generate manual test cases, build regression test suites, validate designs against Figma, and document bugs effectively.

Activation: This skill is triggered only when explicitly called by name (e.g., /qa-test-planner , qa-test-planner , or use the skill qa-test-planner ).

Quick Start

Create a test plan:

"Create a test plan for the user authentication feature"

Generate test cases:

"Generate manual test cases for the checkout flow"

Build regression suite:

"Build a regression test suite for the payment module"

Validate against Figma:

"Compare the login page against the Figma design at [URL]"

Create bug report:

"Create a bug report for the form validation issue"

Quick Reference

Task What You Get Time

Test Plan Strategy, scope, schedule, risks 10-15 min

Test Cases Step-by-step instructions, expected results 5-10 min each

Regression Suite Smoke tests, critical paths, execution order 15-20 min

Figma Validation Design-implementation comparison, discrepancy list 10-15 min

Bug Report Reproducible steps, environment, evidence 5 min

How It Works

Your Request │ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ 1. ANALYZE │ │ • Parse feature/requirement │ │ • Identify test types needed │ │ • Determine scope and priorities │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 2. GENERATE │ │ • Create structured deliverables │ │ • Apply templates and best practices │ │ • Include edge cases and variations │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 3. VALIDATE │ │ • Check completeness │ │ • Verify traceability │ │ • Ensure actionable steps │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ▼ QA Deliverable Ready

Commands

Interactive Scripts

Script Purpose Usage

./scripts/generate_test_cases.sh

Create test cases interactively Step-by-step prompts

./scripts/create_bug_report.sh

Generate bug reports Guided input collection

Natural Language

Request Output

"Create test plan for {feature}" Complete test plan document

"Generate {N} test cases for {feature}" Numbered test cases with steps

"Build smoke test suite" Critical path tests

"Compare with Figma at {URL}" Visual validation checklist

"Document bug: {description}" Structured bug report

Core Deliverables

  1. Test Plans
  • Test scope and objectives

  • Testing approach and strategy

  • Environment requirements

  • Entry/exit criteria

  • Risk assessment

  • Timeline and milestones

  1. Manual Test Cases
  • Step-by-step instructions

  • Expected vs actual results

  • Preconditions and setup

  • Test data requirements

  • Priority and severity

  1. Regression Suites
  • Smoke tests (15-30 min)

  • Full regression (2-4 hours)

  • Targeted regression (30-60 min)

  • Execution order and dependencies

  1. Figma Validation
  • Component-by-component comparison

  • Spacing and typography checks

  • Color and visual consistency

  • Interactive state validation

  1. Bug Reports
  • Clear reproduction steps

  • Environment details

  • Evidence (screenshots, logs)

  • Severity and priority

Anti-Patterns

Avoid Why Instead

Vague test steps Can't reproduce Specific actions + expected results

Missing preconditions Tests fail unexpectedly Document all setup requirements

No test data Tester blocked Provide sample data or generation

Generic bug titles Hard to track Specific: "[Feature] issue when [action]"

Skip edge cases Miss critical bugs Include boundary values, nulls

Verification Checklist

Test Plan:

  • Scope clearly defined (in/out)

  • Entry/exit criteria specified

  • Risks identified with mitigations

  • Timeline realistic

Test Cases:

  • Each step has expected result

  • Preconditions documented

  • Test data available

  • Priority assigned

Bug Reports:

  • Reproducible steps

  • Environment documented

  • Screenshots/evidence attached

  • Severity/priority set

References

  • Test Case Templates - Standard formats for all test types

  • Bug Report Templates - Documentation templates

  • Regression Testing Guide - Suite building and execution

  • Figma Validation Guide - Design-implementation validation

Standard Test Case Format

TC-001: [Test Case Title]

Priority: High | Medium | Low Type: Functional | UI | Integration | Regression Status: Not Run | Pass | Fail | Blocked

Objective

[What are we testing and why]

Preconditions

  • [Setup requirement 1]
  • [Setup requirement 2]
  • [Test data needed]

Test Steps

  1. [Action to perform] Expected: [What should happen]

  2. [Action to perform] Expected: [What should happen]

  3. [Action to perform] Expected: [What should happen]

Test Data

  • Input: [Test data values]
  • User: [Test account details]
  • Configuration: [Environment settings]

Post-conditions

  • [System state after test]
  • [Cleanup required]

Notes

  • [Edge cases to consider]
  • [Related test cases]
  • [Known issues]

Test Types

Type Focus Example

Functional Business logic Login with valid credentials

UI/Visual Appearance, layout Button matches Figma design

Integration Component interaction API returns data to frontend

Regression Existing functionality Previous features still work

Performance Speed, load handling Page loads under 3 seconds

Security Vulnerabilities SQL injection prevented

Test Plan Structure

Test Plan: [Feature/Release Name]

Executive Summary

  • Feature/product being tested
  • Testing objectives
  • Key risks
  • Timeline overview

Test Scope

In Scope:

  • Features to be tested
  • Test types (functional, UI, performance)
  • Platforms and environments
  • User flows and scenarios

Out of Scope:

  • Features not being tested
  • Known limitations
  • Third-party integrations (if applicable)

Test Strategy

Test Types:

  • Manual testing
  • Exploratory testing
  • Regression testing
  • Integration testing
  • User acceptance testing

Test Approach:

  • Black box testing
  • Positive and negative testing
  • Boundary value analysis
  • Equivalence partitioning

Test Environment

  • Operating systems
  • Browsers and versions
  • Devices (mobile, tablet, desktop)
  • Test data requirements
  • Backend/API environments

Entry Criteria

  • Requirements documented
  • Designs finalized
  • Test environment ready
  • Test data prepared
  • Build deployed

Exit Criteria

  • All high-priority test cases executed
  • 90%+ test case pass rate
  • All critical bugs fixed
  • No open high-severity bugs
  • Regression suite passed

Risk Assessment

RiskProbabilityImpactMitigation
[Risk 1]H/M/LH/M/L[Mitigation]

Test Deliverables

  • Test plan document
  • Test cases
  • Test execution reports
  • Bug reports
  • Test summary report

Bug Report Template

BUG-[ID]: [Clear, specific title]

Severity: Critical | High | Medium | Low Priority: P0 | P1 | P2 | P3 Type: Functional | UI | Performance | Security Status: Open | In Progress | Fixed | Closed

Environment

  • OS: [Windows 11, macOS 14, etc.]
  • Browser: [Chrome 120, Firefox 121, etc.]
  • Device: [Desktop, iPhone 15, etc.]
  • Build: [Version/commit]
  • URL: [Page where bug occurs]

Description

[Clear, concise description of the issue]

Steps to Reproduce

  1. [Specific step]
  2. [Specific step]
  3. [Specific step]

Expected Behavior

[What should happen]

Actual Behavior

[What actually happens]

Visual Evidence

  • Screenshot: [attached]
  • Video: [link if applicable]
  • Console errors: [paste errors]

Impact

  • User Impact: [How many users affected]
  • Frequency: [Always, Sometimes, Rarely]
  • Workaround: [If one exists]

Additional Context

  • Related to: [Feature/ticket]
  • Regression: [Yes/No]
  • Figma design: [Link if UI bug]

Severity Definitions

Level Criteria Examples

Critical (P0) System crash, data loss, security Payment fails, login broken

High (P1) Major feature broken, no workaround Search not working

Medium (P2) Feature partial, workaround exists Filter missing one option

Low (P3) Cosmetic, rare edge cases Typo, minor alignment

Design Validation Workflow

Prerequisites:

  • Figma MCP server configured

  • Access to Figma design files

  • Figma URLs for components/pages

Process:

  • Get Design Specs from Figma

"Get the button specifications from Figma file [URL]"

Response includes:

  • Dimensions (width, height)

  • Colors (background, text, border)

  • Typography (font, size, weight)

  • Spacing (padding, margin)

  • Border radius

  • States (default, hover, active, disabled)

  • Compare Implementation

TC: Primary Button Visual Validation

  1. Inspect primary button in browser dev tools
  2. Compare against Figma specs:
    • Dimensions: 120x40px
    • Border-radius: 8px
    • Background color: #0066FF
    • Font: 16px Medium #FFFFFF
  3. Document discrepancies
  • Create Bug if Mismatch

BUG: Primary button color doesn't match design Severity: Medium Expected (Figma): #0066FF Actual (Implementation): #0052CC Screenshot: [attached] Figma link: [specific component]

What to Validate

Element What to Check Tool

Colors Hex values exact Browser color picker

Spacing Padding/margin px DevTools computed styles

Typography Font, size, weight DevTools font panel

Layout Width, height, position DevTools box model

States Hover, active, focus Manual interaction

Responsive Breakpoint behavior DevTools device mode

Example Queries

"Get button specifications from Figma design [URL]" "Compare navigation menu implementation against Figma design" "Extract spacing values for dashboard layout from Figma" "List all color tokens used in Figma design system"

Suite Structure

Suite Type Duration Frequency Coverage

Smoke 15-30 min Daily Critical paths only

Targeted 30-60 min Per change Affected areas

Full 2-4 hours Weekly/Release Comprehensive

Sanity 10-15 min After hotfix Quick validation

Building a Regression Suite

Step 1: Identify Critical Paths

  • What can users NOT live without?

  • What generates revenue?

  • What handles sensitive data?

  • What's used most frequently?

Step 2: Prioritize Test Cases

Priority Description Must Run

P0 Business-critical, security Always

P1 Major features, common flows Weekly+

P2 Minor features, edge cases Releases

Step 3: Execution Order

  • Smoke first - if fails, stop and fix build

  • P0 tests next - must pass before proceeding

  • P1 then P2 - track all failures

  • Exploratory - find unexpected issues

Pass/Fail Criteria

PASS:

  • All P0 tests pass

  • 90%+ P1 tests pass

  • No critical bugs open

FAIL (Block Release):

  • Any P0 test fails

  • Critical bug discovered

  • Security vulnerability

  • Data loss scenario

CONDITIONAL:

  • P1 failures with workarounds

  • Known issues documented

  • Fix plan in place

Test Run Report Template

Test Run: [Release Version]

Date: 2024-01-15 Build: v2.5.0-rc1 Tester: [Name] Environment: Staging

Summary

  • Total Test Cases: 150
  • Executed: 145
  • Passed: 130
  • Failed: 10
  • Blocked: 5
  • Not Run: 5
  • Pass Rate: 90%

Test Cases by Priority

PriorityTotalPassFailBlocked
P0 (Critical)252320
P1 (High)504532
P2 (Medium)504532
P3 (Low)251721

Critical Failures

  • TC-045: Payment processing fails
    • Bug: BUG-234
    • Status: Open

Blocked Tests

  • TC-112: Dashboard widget (API endpoint down)

Risks

  • 2 critical bugs blocking release
  • Payment integration needs attention

Next Steps

  • Retest after BUG-234 fix
  • Complete remaining 5 test cases
  • Run full regression before sign-off

Coverage Tracking

Coverage Matrix

FeatureRequirementsTest CasesStatusGaps
Login812CompleteNone
Checkout1510PartialPayment errors
Dashboard1215CompleteNone

Phase 1: Planning

  • Review requirements and designs

  • Create test plan

  • Identify test scenarios

  • Estimate effort and timeline

  • Set up test environment

Phase 2: Test Design

  • Write test cases

  • Review test cases with team

  • Prepare test data

  • Build regression suite

  • Get Figma design access

Phase 3: Execution

  • Execute test cases

  • Log bugs with clear steps

  • Validate against Figma (UI tests)

  • Track test progress

  • Communicate blockers

Phase 4: Reporting

  • Compile test results

  • Analyze coverage

  • Document risks

  • Provide go/no-go recommendation

  • Archive test artifacts

Test Case Writing

DO:

  • Be specific and unambiguous

  • Include expected results for each step

  • Test one thing per test case

  • Use consistent naming conventions

  • Keep test cases maintainable

DON'T:

  • Assume knowledge

  • Make test cases too long

  • Skip preconditions

  • Forget edge cases

  • Leave expected results vague

Bug Reporting

DO:

  • Provide clear reproduction steps

  • Include screenshots/videos

  • Specify exact environment details

  • Describe impact on users

  • Link to Figma for UI bugs

DON'T:

  • Report without reproduction steps

  • Use vague descriptions

  • Skip environment details

  • Forget to assign priority

  • Duplicate existing bugs

Regression Testing

DO:

  • Automate repetitive tests when possible

  • Maintain regression suite regularly

  • Prioritize critical paths

  • Run smoke tests frequently

  • Update suite after each release

DON'T:

  • Skip regression before releases

  • Let suite become outdated

  • Test everything every time

  • Ignore failed regression tests

Examples

TC-LOGIN-001: Valid User Login

Priority: P0 (Critical) Type: Functional Estimated Time: 2 minutes

Objective

Verify users can successfully login with valid credentials

Preconditions

  • User account exists (test@example.com / Test123!)
  • User is not already logged in
  • Browser cookies cleared

Test Steps

  1. Navigate to https://app.example.com/login Expected: Login page displays with email and password fields

  2. Enter email: test@example.com Expected: Email field accepts input

  3. Enter password: Test123! Expected: Password field shows masked characters

  4. Click "Login" button Expected:

    • Loading indicator appears
    • User redirected to /dashboard
    • Welcome message shown: "Welcome back, Test User"
    • Avatar/profile image displayed in header

Post-conditions

  • User session created
  • Auth token stored
  • Analytics event logged

Edge Cases to Consider

  • TC-LOGIN-002: Invalid password
  • TC-LOGIN-003: Non-existent email
  • TC-LOGIN-004: SQL injection attempt
  • TC-LOGIN-005: Very long password

TC-UI-045: Mobile Navigation Menu

Priority: P1 (High) Type: UI/Responsive Devices: Mobile (iPhone, Android)

Objective

Verify navigation menu works correctly on mobile devices

Preconditions

  • Access from mobile device or responsive mode
  • Viewport width: 375px (iPhone SE) to 428px (iPhone Pro Max)

Test Steps

  1. Open homepage on mobile device Expected: Hamburger menu icon visible (top-right)

  2. Tap hamburger icon Expected:

    • Menu slides in from right
    • Overlay appears over content
    • Close (X) button visible
  3. Tap menu item Expected: Navigate to section, menu closes

  4. Compare against Figma mobile design [link] Expected:

    • Menu width: 280px
    • Slide animation: 300ms ease-out
    • Overlay opacity: 0.5, color #000000
    • Font size: 16px, line-height 24px

Breakpoints to Test

  • 375px (iPhone SE)
  • 390px (iPhone 14)
  • 428px (iPhone 14 Pro Max)
  • 360px (Galaxy S21)

"Testing shows the presence, not the absence of bugs." - Edsger Dijkstra

"Quality is not an act, it is a habit." - Aristotle

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

spec-product-prd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

spec-product-demo

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

spec-product-prototype

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

subagent-driven-development

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review