QA Test Planner
A comprehensive skill for QA engineers to create test plans, generate manual test cases, build regression test suites, validate designs against Figma, and document bugs effectively.
Activation: This skill is triggered only when explicitly called by name (e.g., /qa-test-planner , qa-test-planner , or use the skill qa-test-planner ).
Quick Start
Create a test plan:
"Create a test plan for the user authentication feature"
Generate test cases:
"Generate manual test cases for the checkout flow"
Build regression suite:
"Build a regression test suite for the payment module"
Validate against Figma:
"Compare the login page against the Figma design at [URL]"
Create bug report:
"Create a bug report for the form validation issue"
Quick Reference
Task What You Get Time
Test Plan Strategy, scope, schedule, risks 10-15 min
Test Cases Step-by-step instructions, expected results 5-10 min each
Regression Suite Smoke tests, critical paths, execution order 15-20 min
Figma Validation Design-implementation comparison, discrepancy list 10-15 min
Bug Report Reproducible steps, environment, evidence 5 min
How It Works
Your Request │ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ 1. ANALYZE │ │ • Parse feature/requirement │ │ • Identify test types needed │ │ • Determine scope and priorities │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 2. GENERATE │ │ • Create structured deliverables │ │ • Apply templates and best practices │ │ • Include edge cases and variations │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 3. VALIDATE │ │ • Check completeness │ │ • Verify traceability │ │ • Ensure actionable steps │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ▼ QA Deliverable Ready
Commands
Interactive Scripts
Script Purpose Usage
./scripts/generate_test_cases.sh
Create test cases interactively Step-by-step prompts
./scripts/create_bug_report.sh
Generate bug reports Guided input collection
Natural Language
Request Output
"Create test plan for {feature}" Complete test plan document
"Generate {N} test cases for {feature}" Numbered test cases with steps
"Build smoke test suite" Critical path tests
"Compare with Figma at {URL}" Visual validation checklist
"Document bug: {description}" Structured bug report
Core Deliverables
- Test Plans
-
Test scope and objectives
-
Testing approach and strategy
-
Environment requirements
-
Entry/exit criteria
-
Risk assessment
-
Timeline and milestones
- Manual Test Cases
-
Step-by-step instructions
-
Expected vs actual results
-
Preconditions and setup
-
Test data requirements
-
Priority and severity
- Regression Suites
-
Smoke tests (15-30 min)
-
Full regression (2-4 hours)
-
Targeted regression (30-60 min)
-
Execution order and dependencies
- Figma Validation
-
Component-by-component comparison
-
Spacing and typography checks
-
Color and visual consistency
-
Interactive state validation
- Bug Reports
-
Clear reproduction steps
-
Environment details
-
Evidence (screenshots, logs)
-
Severity and priority
Anti-Patterns
Avoid Why Instead
Vague test steps Can't reproduce Specific actions + expected results
Missing preconditions Tests fail unexpectedly Document all setup requirements
No test data Tester blocked Provide sample data or generation
Generic bug titles Hard to track Specific: "[Feature] issue when [action]"
Skip edge cases Miss critical bugs Include boundary values, nulls
Verification Checklist
Test Plan:
-
Scope clearly defined (in/out)
-
Entry/exit criteria specified
-
Risks identified with mitigations
-
Timeline realistic
Test Cases:
-
Each step has expected result
-
Preconditions documented
-
Test data available
-
Priority assigned
Bug Reports:
-
Reproducible steps
-
Environment documented
-
Screenshots/evidence attached
-
Severity/priority set
References
-
Test Case Templates - Standard formats for all test types
-
Bug Report Templates - Documentation templates
-
Regression Testing Guide - Suite building and execution
-
Figma Validation Guide - Design-implementation validation
Standard Test Case Format
TC-001: [Test Case Title]
Priority: High | Medium | Low Type: Functional | UI | Integration | Regression Status: Not Run | Pass | Fail | Blocked
Objective
[What are we testing and why]
Preconditions
- [Setup requirement 1]
- [Setup requirement 2]
- [Test data needed]
Test Steps
-
[Action to perform] Expected: [What should happen]
-
[Action to perform] Expected: [What should happen]
-
[Action to perform] Expected: [What should happen]
Test Data
- Input: [Test data values]
- User: [Test account details]
- Configuration: [Environment settings]
Post-conditions
- [System state after test]
- [Cleanup required]
Notes
- [Edge cases to consider]
- [Related test cases]
- [Known issues]
Test Types
Type Focus Example
Functional Business logic Login with valid credentials
UI/Visual Appearance, layout Button matches Figma design
Integration Component interaction API returns data to frontend
Regression Existing functionality Previous features still work
Performance Speed, load handling Page loads under 3 seconds
Security Vulnerabilities SQL injection prevented
Test Plan Structure
Test Plan: [Feature/Release Name]
Executive Summary
- Feature/product being tested
- Testing objectives
- Key risks
- Timeline overview
Test Scope
In Scope:
- Features to be tested
- Test types (functional, UI, performance)
- Platforms and environments
- User flows and scenarios
Out of Scope:
- Features not being tested
- Known limitations
- Third-party integrations (if applicable)
Test Strategy
Test Types:
- Manual testing
- Exploratory testing
- Regression testing
- Integration testing
- User acceptance testing
Test Approach:
- Black box testing
- Positive and negative testing
- Boundary value analysis
- Equivalence partitioning
Test Environment
- Operating systems
- Browsers and versions
- Devices (mobile, tablet, desktop)
- Test data requirements
- Backend/API environments
Entry Criteria
- Requirements documented
- Designs finalized
- Test environment ready
- Test data prepared
- Build deployed
Exit Criteria
- All high-priority test cases executed
- 90%+ test case pass rate
- All critical bugs fixed
- No open high-severity bugs
- Regression suite passed
Risk Assessment
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Risk 1] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Mitigation] |
Test Deliverables
- Test plan document
- Test cases
- Test execution reports
- Bug reports
- Test summary report
Bug Report Template
BUG-[ID]: [Clear, specific title]
Severity: Critical | High | Medium | Low Priority: P0 | P1 | P2 | P3 Type: Functional | UI | Performance | Security Status: Open | In Progress | Fixed | Closed
Environment
- OS: [Windows 11, macOS 14, etc.]
- Browser: [Chrome 120, Firefox 121, etc.]
- Device: [Desktop, iPhone 15, etc.]
- Build: [Version/commit]
- URL: [Page where bug occurs]
Description
[Clear, concise description of the issue]
Steps to Reproduce
- [Specific step]
- [Specific step]
- [Specific step]
Expected Behavior
[What should happen]
Actual Behavior
[What actually happens]
Visual Evidence
- Screenshot: [attached]
- Video: [link if applicable]
- Console errors: [paste errors]
Impact
- User Impact: [How many users affected]
- Frequency: [Always, Sometimes, Rarely]
- Workaround: [If one exists]
Additional Context
- Related to: [Feature/ticket]
- Regression: [Yes/No]
- Figma design: [Link if UI bug]
Severity Definitions
Level Criteria Examples
Critical (P0) System crash, data loss, security Payment fails, login broken
High (P1) Major feature broken, no workaround Search not working
Medium (P2) Feature partial, workaround exists Filter missing one option
Low (P3) Cosmetic, rare edge cases Typo, minor alignment
Design Validation Workflow
Prerequisites:
-
Figma MCP server configured
-
Access to Figma design files
-
Figma URLs for components/pages
Process:
- Get Design Specs from Figma
"Get the button specifications from Figma file [URL]"
Response includes:
-
Dimensions (width, height)
-
Colors (background, text, border)
-
Typography (font, size, weight)
-
Spacing (padding, margin)
-
Border radius
-
States (default, hover, active, disabled)
-
Compare Implementation
TC: Primary Button Visual Validation
- Inspect primary button in browser dev tools
- Compare against Figma specs:
- Dimensions: 120x40px
- Border-radius: 8px
- Background color: #0066FF
- Font: 16px Medium #FFFFFF
- Document discrepancies
- Create Bug if Mismatch
BUG: Primary button color doesn't match design Severity: Medium Expected (Figma): #0066FF Actual (Implementation): #0052CC Screenshot: [attached] Figma link: [specific component]
What to Validate
Element What to Check Tool
Colors Hex values exact Browser color picker
Spacing Padding/margin px DevTools computed styles
Typography Font, size, weight DevTools font panel
Layout Width, height, position DevTools box model
States Hover, active, focus Manual interaction
Responsive Breakpoint behavior DevTools device mode
Example Queries
"Get button specifications from Figma design [URL]" "Compare navigation menu implementation against Figma design" "Extract spacing values for dashboard layout from Figma" "List all color tokens used in Figma design system"
Suite Structure
Suite Type Duration Frequency Coverage
Smoke 15-30 min Daily Critical paths only
Targeted 30-60 min Per change Affected areas
Full 2-4 hours Weekly/Release Comprehensive
Sanity 10-15 min After hotfix Quick validation
Building a Regression Suite
Step 1: Identify Critical Paths
-
What can users NOT live without?
-
What generates revenue?
-
What handles sensitive data?
-
What's used most frequently?
Step 2: Prioritize Test Cases
Priority Description Must Run
P0 Business-critical, security Always
P1 Major features, common flows Weekly+
P2 Minor features, edge cases Releases
Step 3: Execution Order
-
Smoke first - if fails, stop and fix build
-
P0 tests next - must pass before proceeding
-
P1 then P2 - track all failures
-
Exploratory - find unexpected issues
Pass/Fail Criteria
PASS:
-
All P0 tests pass
-
90%+ P1 tests pass
-
No critical bugs open
FAIL (Block Release):
-
Any P0 test fails
-
Critical bug discovered
-
Security vulnerability
-
Data loss scenario
CONDITIONAL:
-
P1 failures with workarounds
-
Known issues documented
-
Fix plan in place
Test Run Report Template
Test Run: [Release Version]
Date: 2024-01-15 Build: v2.5.0-rc1 Tester: [Name] Environment: Staging
Summary
- Total Test Cases: 150
- Executed: 145
- Passed: 130
- Failed: 10
- Blocked: 5
- Not Run: 5
- Pass Rate: 90%
Test Cases by Priority
| Priority | Total | Pass | Fail | Blocked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 (Critical) | 25 | 23 | 2 | 0 |
| P1 (High) | 50 | 45 | 3 | 2 |
| P2 (Medium) | 50 | 45 | 3 | 2 |
| P3 (Low) | 25 | 17 | 2 | 1 |
Critical Failures
- TC-045: Payment processing fails
- Bug: BUG-234
- Status: Open
Blocked Tests
- TC-112: Dashboard widget (API endpoint down)
Risks
- 2 critical bugs blocking release
- Payment integration needs attention
Next Steps
- Retest after BUG-234 fix
- Complete remaining 5 test cases
- Run full regression before sign-off
Coverage Tracking
Coverage Matrix
| Feature | Requirements | Test Cases | Status | Gaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Login | 8 | 12 | Complete | None |
| Checkout | 15 | 10 | Partial | Payment errors |
| Dashboard | 12 | 15 | Complete | None |
Phase 1: Planning
-
Review requirements and designs
-
Create test plan
-
Identify test scenarios
-
Estimate effort and timeline
-
Set up test environment
Phase 2: Test Design
-
Write test cases
-
Review test cases with team
-
Prepare test data
-
Build regression suite
-
Get Figma design access
Phase 3: Execution
-
Execute test cases
-
Log bugs with clear steps
-
Validate against Figma (UI tests)
-
Track test progress
-
Communicate blockers
Phase 4: Reporting
-
Compile test results
-
Analyze coverage
-
Document risks
-
Provide go/no-go recommendation
-
Archive test artifacts
Test Case Writing
DO:
-
Be specific and unambiguous
-
Include expected results for each step
-
Test one thing per test case
-
Use consistent naming conventions
-
Keep test cases maintainable
DON'T:
-
Assume knowledge
-
Make test cases too long
-
Skip preconditions
-
Forget edge cases
-
Leave expected results vague
Bug Reporting
DO:
-
Provide clear reproduction steps
-
Include screenshots/videos
-
Specify exact environment details
-
Describe impact on users
-
Link to Figma for UI bugs
DON'T:
-
Report without reproduction steps
-
Use vague descriptions
-
Skip environment details
-
Forget to assign priority
-
Duplicate existing bugs
Regression Testing
DO:
-
Automate repetitive tests when possible
-
Maintain regression suite regularly
-
Prioritize critical paths
-
Run smoke tests frequently
-
Update suite after each release
DON'T:
-
Skip regression before releases
-
Let suite become outdated
-
Test everything every time
-
Ignore failed regression tests
Examples
TC-LOGIN-001: Valid User Login
Priority: P0 (Critical) Type: Functional Estimated Time: 2 minutes
Objective
Verify users can successfully login with valid credentials
Preconditions
- User account exists (test@example.com / Test123!)
- User is not already logged in
- Browser cookies cleared
Test Steps
-
Navigate to https://app.example.com/login Expected: Login page displays with email and password fields
-
Enter email: test@example.com Expected: Email field accepts input
-
Enter password: Test123! Expected: Password field shows masked characters
-
Click "Login" button Expected:
- Loading indicator appears
- User redirected to /dashboard
- Welcome message shown: "Welcome back, Test User"
- Avatar/profile image displayed in header
Post-conditions
- User session created
- Auth token stored
- Analytics event logged
Edge Cases to Consider
- TC-LOGIN-002: Invalid password
- TC-LOGIN-003: Non-existent email
- TC-LOGIN-004: SQL injection attempt
- TC-LOGIN-005: Very long password
TC-UI-045: Mobile Navigation Menu
Priority: P1 (High) Type: UI/Responsive Devices: Mobile (iPhone, Android)
Objective
Verify navigation menu works correctly on mobile devices
Preconditions
- Access from mobile device or responsive mode
- Viewport width: 375px (iPhone SE) to 428px (iPhone Pro Max)
Test Steps
-
Open homepage on mobile device Expected: Hamburger menu icon visible (top-right)
-
Tap hamburger icon Expected:
- Menu slides in from right
- Overlay appears over content
- Close (X) button visible
-
Tap menu item Expected: Navigate to section, menu closes
-
Compare against Figma mobile design [link] Expected:
- Menu width: 280px
- Slide animation: 300ms ease-out
- Overlay opacity: 0.5, color #000000
- Font size: 16px, line-height 24px
Breakpoints to Test
- 375px (iPhone SE)
- 390px (iPhone 14)
- 428px (iPhone 14 Pro Max)
- 360px (Galaxy S21)
"Testing shows the presence, not the absence of bugs." - Edsger Dijkstra
"Quality is not an act, it is a habit." - Aristotle