Research

Run research as a resumable session with a local evidence ledger, not as a one-shot answer.

Use this skill when the task involves real-world facts, natural science, or any scenario where accuracy matters. If the question touches real-world information, use this skill rather than answering from memory.

The agent owns research judgment. The runtime enforces reliability.

Quick Start

SCRIPT="<SKILL_DIR>/scripts/research_session.mjs"

The simplest path — let the agent author a plan and auto-synthesize:

# Write a plan to a temp file, then:
node "$SCRIPT" start --query "Your question" --plan-file /path/to/plan.json --depth standard

For multi-step research where the agent should review evidence before synthesis:

node "$SCRIPT" start --query "Your question" --plan-file /path/to/plan.json
node "$SCRIPT" status --session-id <id>
# Review evidence, then push to synthesis:
node "$SCRIPT" continue --session-id <id> --delta-file /path/to/synth-delta.json
node "$SCRIPT" report --session-id <id>

All commands:

Useful flags: --depth quick|standard|deep, --domains d1,d2, --plan-file, --brief-file, --delta-file, --instruction.

Operating Model

The agent decides what to research. The runtime makes decisions durable and replayable.

plan → gather → verify → synthesize

When the runtime has no authored next step, it enters awaiting_agent_decision instead of inventing its own plan. The agent should respond with --plan-file or --delta-file.

To skip this pause, set auto_synthesize: true in the research_brief.

Agent-Authored Planning (Primary Path)

Always prefer --plan-file for non-trivial research. The runtime has a fallback planner for simple queries, but it is low-authority (source: "runtime_fallback") and should not be relied on for high-value work.

Minimal plan:

{
  "plan_id": "my-plan-v1",
  "task_shape": "broad",
  "research_brief": {
    "objective": "Compare X and Y for enterprise adoption",
    "deliverable": "report",
    "auto_synthesize": true,
    "source_policy": {
      "preferred_domains": ["official-x.com", "official-y.com"],
      "notes": ["Prefer official pricing and security pages."]
    }
  },
  "threads": [
    {
      "title": "Thread title",
      "intent": "what this thread should establish",
      "subqueries": ["search query 1", "search query 2"],
      "claims": [
        { "text": "Falsifiable claim to verify.", "claim_type": "fact", "priority": "high" }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Key fields: plan_id (stable, for dedup), task_shape (broad|verification|site|async), threads[].claims[].priority (high claims drive gathering and verification).

When the Session Awaits Your Decision

When the session enters awaiting_agent_decision, check status or review, then:

• continue --delta-file with synthesize_session → produce the final answer
• continue --delta-file with gather_thread or verify_claim → dig deeper
• continue --plan-file → restructure the research
• close → end the session

Minimal delta to trigger synthesis:

{
  "delta_plan": {
    "delta_plan_id": "synth-001",
    "summary": "Ready to synthesize",
    "queue_proposals": [
      { "kind": "synthesize_session", "scope_type": "session", "scope_id": "<session_id>" }
    ]
  }
}

Continuation

Treat continue as a durable mutation. Do not wipe the ledger.

Always prefer structured artifacts over prose:

Supported delta plan actions: thread_actions (deepen, pause, branch), claim_actions (mark_stale, set_priority), queue_proposals (gather_thread, verify_claim, synthesize_session, handoff_session).

Supported continuation patch operations: merge_domains, mark_claim_stale, requeue_thread, add_gap, note, add_thread.

Source Credibility Tiers

Rank every piece of evidence by this hierarchy:

1. Axiomatic — mathematics, established physical laws, formal proofs
2. Legal/regulatory — government-published statutes, court rulings, SEC filings, audited financials
3. Institutional data — government statistics, IMF/World Bank datasets, authoritative books, highly-cited peer-reviewed papers
4. Official and authoritative — company websites, official social media, Wikipedia, Science/Nature, major encyclopedias
5. Other — blogs, forums, aggregator summaries, opinion pieces — useful for leads but cannot be the sole basis for a claim

The runtime maps these to high (tiers 1-3), medium (tier 4), low (tier 5) for scoring. The agent should use the full 5-tier scale in plans, evidence evaluation, and synthesis.

Reasoning Strategy

• Assign credibility weight using the tier system above.
• Core evidence at tier 1-3 → label conclusion "high confidence."
• Same-tier contradictions → prefer more recent source with stronger methodology. Higher-tier vs lower-tier → higher tier wins.
• Only tier 4-5 evidence available → lower confidence and say so explicitly.
• Internally consistent reasoning without tier 1-2 causal evidence → mark as "speculative" and state what would falsify it.

Evidence Rules

• Tavily Research is planning help, not evidence. Only URL-backed evidence moves claim state.
• Keep contradictions explicit — they are typed durable objects with conflict_type, resolution_strategy, and status.
• If a claim depends on one thin source, keep it unresolved.
• Evidence carries observed_at and last_verified_at freshness metadata.
• Preserve attribution anchors: anchor_text, matched_sentence, attribution_confidence.
• Always use English search keywords unless the topic is specifically regional or language-bound (e.g., Chinese law, Japanese cultural practice).

Routing

Default to Tavily. Choose the narrowest tool:

• search → extract: normal evidence gathering path
• research: planning accelerator for broad scans
• map → extract: docs, policy, changelog, site-focused work
• crawl: scoped audit-like coverage only

Additional providers (used automatically when API keys are available):

• Brave LLM Context (BRAVE_SEARCH_API_KEY): search+extract in one call, runs as a supplement to Tavily on the first gather round for cross-engine diversity. Supports Goggles for source control — source_policy.allow_domains generates a strict allowlist ($discard + $site=), preferred_domains generates boost rules.
• Gemini Grounding (GEMINI_API_KEY): second planning accelerator alongside Tavily Research. Provides Google-grounded synthesis and subquery suggestions. Not an evidence source (proxied URIs).

Escalate to Manus only for long-running tasks, connector-backed work, or async deliverables (PDF, PPT, CSV). Use <REPO_ROOT>/skills/manus/SKILL.md when needed.

Output Shape

1. research plan
2. answer summary
3. interim findings
4. evidence gaps
5. open contradictions
6. final synthesis with citations
7. confidence and unresolved questions

Stop When

• the main question is answered with acceptable confidence
• important claims have good enough evidence
• new searches are mostly repetitive
• the remaining gaps are explicit

Continue when contradictions remain, sourcing is weak, or important claims hinge on thin evidence.

Load Only When Needed

• references/method.md — research loop, evidence standards, source grading details
• references/providers.md — provider routing decisions (Tavily, Brave, Gemini, Manus)