doc-tasks-reviewer

Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for Task Breakdown (TASKS) documents. This skill performs deep content analysis beyond structural validation, checking task completeness, SPEC alignment, implementation contracts, dependency accuracy, and identifying issues that require manual review.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "doc-tasks-reviewer" with this command: npx skills add vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/vladm3105-aidoc-flow-framework-doc-tasks-reviewer

doc-tasks-reviewer

Purpose

Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for Task Breakdown (TASKS) documents. This skill performs deep content analysis beyond structural validation, checking task completeness, SPEC alignment, implementation contracts, dependency accuracy, and identifying issues that require manual review.

Layer: 11 (TASKS Quality Assurance)

Upstream: TASKS (from doc-tasks-autopilot or doc-tasks )

Downstream: None (final QA gate before code implementation)

When to Use This Skill

Use doc-tasks-reviewer when:

  • After TASKS Generation: Run immediately after doc-tasks-autopilot completes

  • Manual TASKS Edits: After making manual changes to TASKS

  • Pre-Implementation: Before starting code implementation

  • Sprint Planning: When assessing task readiness for development

  • Periodic Review: Regular quality checks on existing TASKS

Do NOT use when:

  • TASKS does not exist yet (use doc-tasks or doc-tasks-autopilot first)

  • Need structural/schema validation only (use doc-tasks-validator )

  • Generating new TASKS content (use doc-tasks )

Skill vs Validator: Key Differences

Aspect doc-tasks-validator

doc-tasks-reviewer

Focus Schema compliance, CODE-Ready score Content quality, implementation readiness

Checks Required sections, format Task atomicity, dependency accuracy

Auto-Fix Structural issues only Content issues (formatting)

Output CODE-Ready score (numeric) Review score + issue list

Phase Phase 4 (Validation) Phase 5 (Final Review)

Blocking CODE-Ready < threshold blocks Review score < threshold flags

Review Workflow

flowchart TD A[Input: TASKS Path] --> B[Load TASKS File] B --> C{Valid Format?}

C -->|Yes| D[Parse TASKS Structure]
C -->|No| E[Report Format Error]

D --> F0[0. Structure Compliance]
E --> F0
F0 --> F0C{BLOCKING Check}
F0C -->|FAIL| BLOCK[STOP - Fix Structure First]
F0C -->|PASS| F[Run Review Checks]

subgraph Review["Review Checks"]
    F --> G[1. Task Completeness]
    G --> H[2. SPEC Alignment]
    H --> I[3. Implementation Contracts]
    I --> J[4. Dependency Accuracy]
    J --> K[5. Task Atomicity]
    K --> L[6. AI Implementation Hints]
    L --> M[7. Placeholder Detection]
    M --> M2[8. Naming Compliance]
    M2 --> M3[9. Upstream Drift Detection]
end

M3 --> N{Issues Found?}
N -->|Yes| O[Categorize Issues]
O --> P{Auto-Fixable?}
P -->|Yes| Q[Apply Auto-Fixes]
Q --> R[Re-run Affected Checks]
P -->|No| S[Flag for Manual Review]
R --> N
S --> T[Generate Report]
N -->|No| T
T --> U[Calculate Review Score]
U --> V{Score >= Threshold?}
V -->|Yes| W[PASS]
V -->|No| X[FAIL with Details]

Review Checks

  1. Structure Compliance (12/12) - BLOCKING

Validates TASKS follows the mandatory nested folder rule.

Nested Folder Rule: ALL TASKS documents MUST be in nested folders.

Required Structure:

TASKS Type Required Location

Monolithic docs/11_TASKS/TASKS-NN_{slug}/TASKS-NN_{slug}.md

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-STR001 Error TASKS not in nested folder (BLOCKING)

REV-STR002 Error Folder name doesn't match TASKS ID

REV-STR003 Warning File name doesn't match folder name

This check is BLOCKING - TASKS must pass structure validation before other checks proceed.

  1. Task Completeness

Validates all tasks have required elements.

Required Elements:

  • Task ID

  • Description

  • Acceptance criteria

  • Priority

  • Estimated complexity

  • Dependencies

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-TC001 Error Task missing required element

REV-TC002 Warning Acceptance criteria insufficient

REV-TC003 Warning Priority not assigned

REV-TC004 Info Complexity estimate missing

  1. SPEC Alignment

Validates tasks trace to SPEC requirements.

Scope:

  • Every task maps to SPEC component/method

  • Full SPEC coverage achieved

  • No orphaned tasks

  • Implementation order logical

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-SA001 Error Task without SPEC source

REV-SA002 Warning SPEC component not covered

REV-SA003 Warning Orphaned task detected

REV-SA004 Info Implementation order may need adjustment

  1. Implementation Contracts

Validates Section 7-8 implementation contracts.

Scope:

  • Protocol interfaces defined

  • Exception hierarchies documented

  • State machine contracts present

  • Data models specified

  • DI interfaces defined

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-IC001 Warning Protocol interface missing

REV-IC002 Warning Exception hierarchy not documented

REV-IC003 Info State machine contract missing

REV-IC004 Info DI interface not defined

  1. Dependency Accuracy

Validates task dependencies are correct.

Scope:

  • Dependencies exist

  • No circular dependencies

  • Blocking dependencies identified

  • External dependencies documented

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-DA001 Error Dependency does not exist

REV-DA002 Error Circular dependency detected

REV-DA003 Warning Blocking dependency not marked

REV-DA004 Info External dependency not documented

  1. Task Atomicity

Validates tasks are appropriately sized.

Scope:

  • Single responsibility

  • Independently implementable

  • Clear completion criteria

  • Reasonable scope

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-TA001 Warning Task too large (should be split)

REV-TA002 Warning Task has multiple responsibilities

REV-TA003 Info Completion criteria unclear

REV-TA004 Info Task scope may be too narrow

  1. AI Implementation Hints

Validates AI-friendly implementation guidance.

Scope:

  • File paths specified

  • Method signatures suggested

  • Import statements provided

  • Test patterns documented

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-AI001 Warning File path not specified

REV-AI002 Info Method signature not suggested

REV-AI003 Info Import statements not provided

REV-AI004 Info Test patterns not documented

  1. Placeholder Detection

Identifies incomplete content requiring replacement.

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-P001 Error [TODO] placeholder found

REV-P002 Error [TBD] placeholder found

REV-P003 Warning Template value not replaced

  1. Naming Compliance

Validates element IDs follow doc-naming standards.

Scope:

  • Element IDs use TASKS.NN.TT.SS format

  • Element type codes valid for TASKS (18, 30)

  • Task naming convention

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-N001 Error Invalid element ID format

REV-N002 Error Element type code not valid for TASKS

REV-N003 Error Legacy pattern detected

  1. Upstream Drift Detection (Mandatory Cache)

Detects when upstream SPEC and TSPEC documents have been modified after the TASKS was created or last updated.

The drift cache is mandatory. All drift detection operations require cache initialization and maintenance.

Purpose: Identifies stale TASKS content that may not reflect current SPEC and TSPEC documentation. When SPEC documents (methods, interfaces, components) or TSPEC documents (test cases, coverage requirements) change, the TASKS may need updates to maintain implementation alignment.

Scope:

  • @spec: tag targets (SPEC documents)

  • @tspec: tag targets (TSPEC documents)

  • Traceability section upstream artifact links

  • Any markdown links to ../09_SPEC/ or ../10_TSPEC/ source documents

Drift Cache File (MANDATORY)

Location: docs/11_TASKS/.drift_cache.json

Schema:

{ "schema_version": "1.0", "cache_created": "2026-02-10T17:00:00Z", "cache_updated": "2026-02-10T17:00:00Z", "tasks_files": { "TASKS-03_f3_observability.md": { "tasks_version": "1.0", "tasks_updated": "2026-02-10T14:30:00", "last_review": "2026-02-10T17:00:00", "upstream_hashes": { "../../09_SPEC/SPEC-03.yaml": "a1b2c3d4e5f6g7h8i9j0k1l2m3n4o5p6q7r8s9t0", "../../09_SPEC/SPEC-03.yaml#methods": "b2c3d4e5f6g7h8i9j0k1l2m3n4o5p6q7r8s9t0u1", "../../09_SPEC/SPEC-03.yaml#components": "c3d4e5f6g7h8i9j0k1l2m3n4o5p6q7r8s9t0u1v2", "../../10_TSPEC/TSPEC-03.md": "d4e5f6g7h8i9j0k1l2m3n4o5p6q7r8s9t0u1v2w3", "../../10_TSPEC/TSPEC-03.md#test_cases": "e5f6g7h8i9j0k1l2m3n4o5p6q7r8s9t0u1v2w3x4" }, "upstream_mtimes": { "../../09_SPEC/SPEC-03.yaml": "2026-02-08T10:15:00", "../../10_TSPEC/TSPEC-03.md": "2026-02-09T16:45:00" } } } }

Cache Management:

  • Cache file is created on first review if not present

  • Cache is updated after each successful review

  • Missing cache triggers REV-D006 error

  • Corrupted cache triggers cache rebuild with warning

Three-Phase Detection Algorithm

Phase 1: Cache Validation

  1. Check if .drift_cache.json exists

    • If missing → ERROR REV-D006: "Drift cache not initialized"
    • If corrupted → Rebuild cache, emit WARNING
  2. Validate cache schema version

    • If outdated → Migrate cache to current schema
  3. Load TASKS entry from cache

    • If TASKS not in cache → Initialize entry

Phase 2: Reference Extraction

  1. Extract all upstream references from TASKS:

    • @spec: tags → [path, section anchor]
    • @tspec: tags → [path, section anchor]
    • Links to ../09_SPEC/ → [path]
    • Links to ../10_TSPEC/ → [path]
    • Traceability table upstream artifacts → [path]
  2. For each upstream reference: a. Resolve path to absolute file path b. Check file exists (already covered by Check #2) c. Get file modification time (mtime)

Phase 3: Drift Comparison

  1. For each upstream reference: a. Compare mtime > cached mtime

    • If newer → flag as TIMESTAMP_DRIFT b. Compute SHA-256 hash of content c. Compare to cached hash
    • If differs → flag as CONTENT_DRIFT d. Calculate change percentage
    • If > 20% → flag as SUBSTANTIAL_DRIFT
  2. Update cache with current values after comparison

Hash Calculation (MANDATORY BASH EXECUTION)

CRITICAL: Execute actual bash commands. DO NOT write placeholder values.

Full File Hash:

sha256sum <file_path> | cut -d' ' -f1

Store as: "hash": "sha256:<64_hex_characters>"

Section Hash (for anchor references):

For markdown sections

sed -n '/^## Section Name/,/^## /p' <file_path> | head -n -1 | sha256sum | cut -d' ' -f1

For YAML sections

yq '.<section_name>' <file_path> | sha256sum | cut -d' ' -f1

REJECTED VALUES (re-compute immediately):

  • sha256:verified_no_drift

  • sha256:pending_verification

  • Any value where hex portion != 64 characters

Verification:

grep -oP '"hash":\s*"sha256:[0-9a-f]{64}"' .drift_cache.json

Error Codes

Code Severity Description

REV-D001 Warning Upstream SPEC/TSPEC document modified after TASKS creation

REV-D002 Warning Referenced section content has changed (hash mismatch)

REV-D003 Info Upstream document version incremented

REV-D004 Info New content added to upstream document

REV-D005 Error Critical upstream document substantially modified (>20% change)

REV-D006 Error Drift cache not initialized or missing

REV-D009 Error Invalid hash placeholder detected (verified_no_drift , pending_verification )

Report Output

Upstream Drift Analysis

Cache Status: Valid (last updated: 2026-02-10T17:00:00Z)

Upstream DocumentTASKS ReferenceLast ModifiedCached ModifiedHash MatchDays StaleSeverity
SPEC-03.yaml@spec Section methods2026-02-08T10:15:002026-02-05T09:00:00No3Warning
SPEC-03.yaml@spec components2026-02-10T14:30:002026-02-05T09:00:00No5Warning
TSPEC-03.md@tspec test_cases2026-02-09T16:45:002026-02-05T09:00:00Yes4Info

Recommendation: Review upstream SPEC/TSPEC changes and update TASKS if methods, components, or test cases have changed.

Cache Updated: 2026-02-10T17:00:00Z (3 entries refreshed)

Auto-Actions

  • Create .drift_cache.json if not present (first review)

  • Update cache with current hashes and mtimes after review

  • Add [DRIFT] marker to affected @spec/@tspec tags (optional)

  • Generate drift summary in review report

Configuration

Setting Default Description

cache_enabled

true Mandatory - Cache is always enabled

drift_threshold_days

7 Days before drift becomes Warning

critical_threshold_days

30 Days before drift becomes Error

tracked_patterns

@spec: , @tspec:

Patterns to track for drift

Review Score Calculation

Scoring Formula:

Category Weight Calculation

Task Completeness 19% (complete_tasks / total) × 19

SPEC Alignment 19% (aligned_tasks / total) × 19

Implementation Contracts 14% (contracts_present / required) × 14

Dependency Accuracy 14% (valid_deps / total_deps) × 14

Task Atomicity 10% (atomic_tasks / total) × 10

AI Implementation Hints 5% (hints_present / total) × 5

Placeholder Detection 5% (no_placeholders ? 5 : 5 - count)

Naming Compliance 9% (valid_ids / total_ids) × 9

Upstream Drift 5% (fresh_refs / total_refs) × 5

Total: Sum of all categories (max 100)

Thresholds:

  • PASS: >= 90

  • WARNING: 80-89

  • FAIL: < 80

Command Usage

Review specific TASKS

/doc-tasks-reviewer TASKS-03

Review TASKS by path

/doc-tasks-reviewer docs/11_TASKS/TASKS-03_f3_observability.md

Review all TASKS

/doc-tasks-reviewer all

Output Report

Review reports are stored alongside the reviewed document per project standards.

Nested Folder Rule: ALL TASKS use nested folders (TASKS-NN_{slug}/ ) regardless of size. This ensures review reports, fix reports, and drift cache files are organized with their parent document.

File Naming: TASKS-NN.R_review_report_vNNN.md

Location: Inside the TASKS nested folder: docs/11_TASKS/TASKS-NN_{slug}/

Versioning Rules

  • First Review: Creates TASKS-NN.R_review_report_v001.md

  • Subsequent Reviews: Auto-increments version (v002, v003, etc.)

  • Same-Day Reviews: Each review gets unique version number

Version Detection: Scans folder for existing TASKS-NN.R_review_report_v*.md files and increments.

Example:

docs/11_TASKS/TASKS-03_f3_observability/ ├── TASKS-03_f3_observability.md ├── TASKS-03.R_review_report_v001.md # First review ├── TASKS-03.R_review_report_v002.md # After fixes └── .drift_cache.json

Delta Reporting

When previous reviews exist, include score comparison in the report.

See REVIEW_DOCUMENT_STANDARDS.md for complete versioning requirements.

Integration with doc-tasks-autopilot

This skill is invoked during Phase 5 of doc-tasks-autopilot :

flowchart LR A[Phase 4: Validation] --> B[Phase 5: Final Review] B --> C{doc-tasks-reviewer} C --> D[Phase 6: Continue]

Related Skills

Skill Relationship

doc-naming

Naming standards for Check #8

doc-tasks-autopilot

Invokes this skill in Phase 5

doc-tasks-validator

Structural validation (Phase 4)

doc-tasks-fixer

Applies fixes based on review findings

doc-tasks

TASKS creation rules

doc-spec-reviewer

Upstream QA

doc-tspec-reviewer

Upstream QA (for test specifications)

Version History

Version Date Changes

1.4 2026-02-11 Added Check #0: Structure Compliance as BLOCKING check; REV-STR001-STR003 error codes; Enforces nested folder rule before other checks proceed

1.3 2026-02-10 Made drift cache mandatory; Added REV-D006 error code for missing cache; Defined cache schema with schema_version; Added Three-Phase Detection Algorithm; Added hash calculation examples; Cache location at docs/11_TASKS/.drift_cache.json; Added cache status to report output

1.2 2026-02-10 Added Check #9: Upstream Drift Detection - detects when SPEC/TSPEC documents modified after TASKS creation; REV-D001-D005 error codes; drift cache support; configurable thresholds; added doc-tasks-fixer to related skills

1.1 2026-02-10 Added review versioning support (_vNNN pattern); Delta reporting for score comparison

1.0 2026-02-10 Initial skill creation with 8 review checks; Task completeness; SPEC alignment; Implementation contracts; Dependency accuracy; Task atomicity

Implementation Plan Consistency (IPLAN-004)

  • Treat plan-derived outputs as valid source mode and verify intent preservation from implementation plan scope/objectives.

  • Validate upstream autopilot precedence assumption: --iplan > --ref > --prompt .

  • Flag objective/scope conflicts between plan context and artifact output as blocking issues requiring clarification.

  • Do not introduce legacy fallback paths such as docs-v2.0/00_REF .

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

n8n

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

google-adk

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

doc-prd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

devops-flow

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review