doc-dspec-reviewer

Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for Documentation Specification (DSPEC) documents. This skill performs deep content analysis beyond structural validation, checking content coverage, audience alignment, style compliance, and identifying issues that require manual review.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "doc-dspec-reviewer" with this command: npx skills add vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/vladm3105-aidoc-flow-framework-doc-dspec-reviewer

doc-dspec-reviewer

Purpose

Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for Documentation Specification (DSPEC) documents. This skill performs deep content analysis beyond structural validation, checking content coverage, audience alignment, style compliance, and identifying issues that require manual review.

Layer: 9.51 (DSPEC Quality Assurance)

Upstream: DSPEC (from doc-dspec-autopilot )

Downstream: None (final QA gate before TASKS generation)

When to Use

Use doc-dspec-reviewer when:

  • After DSPEC Generation: Run immediately after doc-dspec-autopilot completes

  • Manual DSPEC Edits: After making manual changes to DSPEC

  • Pre-TASKS Check: Before running doc-tasks-autopilot

  • Periodic Review: Regular quality checks on existing DSPECs

Review Checklist

  1. Content Coverage Review
  • All REQ topics addressed

  • Information architecture logical

  • Content depth appropriate for audience

  • Examples sufficient and relevant

  1. Audience Alignment Review
  • Primary audience clearly defined

  • Technical level appropriate

  • Prerequisites realistic

  • Terminology appropriate for audience

  1. Structure Review
  • Logical flow of topics

  • Section hierarchy appropriate

  • Navigation aids specified

  • Cross-references defined

  1. Style Compliance Review
  • Style guide referenced

  • Voice and tone consistent

  • Formatting standards met

  • Terminology consistent

  1. Accessibility Review
  • Visual content has alt text specs

  • Color contrast considered

  • Reading level appropriate

  • Multi-format considerations

  1. Traceability Review
  • All cumulative tags present

  • REQ requirements mapped

  • Source references complete

Review Report Format

DSPEC-NN Review Report

Summary

  • Document: DSPEC-NN_{slug}
  • Review Date: YYYY-MM-DD
  • DOC-Ready Score: NN%
  • Status: PASS/FAIL

Findings

Critical Issues

  1. [Issue description]

Warnings

  1. [Warning description]

Recommendations

  1. [Improvement suggestion]

Metrics

MetricValueTarget
Content CoverageNN%100%
Audience AlignmentNN%90%
Style ComplianceNN%85%

References

  • Template: ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/DSPEC/DSPEC-MVP-TEMPLATE.yaml

  • Schema: ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/DSPEC/DSPEC_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

n8n

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

google-adk

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

doc-prd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

devops-flow

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review