doc-adr-reviewer

Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for Architecture Decision Records (ADR). This skill performs deep content analysis beyond structural validation, checking decision completeness, BRD topic alignment, consequence coverage, alternative evaluation, and identifying issues that require manual architectural review.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "doc-adr-reviewer" with this command: npx skills add vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/vladm3105-aidoc-flow-framework-doc-adr-reviewer

doc-adr-reviewer

Purpose

Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for Architecture Decision Records (ADR). This skill performs deep content analysis beyond structural validation, checking decision completeness, BRD topic alignment, consequence coverage, alternative evaluation, and identifying issues that require manual architectural review.

Layer: 5 (ADR Quality Assurance)

Upstream: ADR (from doc-adr-autopilot or doc-adr )

Downstream: None (final QA gate before SYS generation)

When to Use This Skill

Use doc-adr-reviewer when:

  • After ADR Generation: Run immediately after doc-adr-autopilot completes

  • Manual ADR Edits: After making manual changes to ADR

  • Pre-SYS Check: Before running doc-sys-autopilot

  • Periodic Review: Regular quality checks on existing ADRs

  • Architecture Reviews: During formal architecture review sessions

Do NOT use when:

  • ADR does not exist yet (use doc-adr or doc-adr-autopilot first)

  • Need structural/schema validation only (use doc-adr-validator )

  • Generating new ADR content (use doc-adr )

Skill vs Validator: Key Differences

Aspect doc-adr-validator

doc-adr-reviewer

Focus Schema compliance, SYS-Ready score Content quality, decision rationale

Checks Required sections, format Consequence coverage, alternative evaluation

Auto-Fix Structural issues only Content issues (links, formatting)

Output SYS-Ready score (numeric) Review score + issue list

Phase Phase 4 (Validation) Phase 5 (Final Review)

Blocking SYS-Ready < threshold blocks Review score < threshold flags

Review Workflow

flowchart TD A[Input: ADR Path] --> B[Load ADR Files] B --> C{Single or Multiple?}

C -->|Multiple| D[Load All ADR Files]
C -->|Single| E[Load Single File]

D --> F[Run Review Checks]
E --> F

subgraph Review["Review Checks"]
    F --> G[1. Decision Completeness]
    G --> H[2. BRD Topic Alignment]
  H --> H2[2a. Diagram Contract Compliance]
  H2 --> I[3. Consequence Coverage]
    I --> J[4. Alternative Evaluation]
    J --> K[5. Cross-Reference Integrity]
    K --> L[6. Placeholder Detection]
    L --> M[7. Naming Compliance]
    M --> N2[8. Upstream Drift Detection]
end

N2 --> N{Issues Found?}
N -->|Yes| O[Categorize Issues]
O --> P{Auto-Fixable?}
P -->|Yes| Q[Apply Auto-Fixes]
Q --> R[Re-run Affected Checks]
P -->|No| S[Flag for Manual Review]
R --> N
S --> T[Generate Report]
N -->|No| T
T --> U[Calculate Review Score]
U --> V{Score >= Threshold?}
V -->|Yes| W[PASS]
V -->|No| X[FAIL with Details]

Review Checks

  1. Structure Compliance (12/12) - BLOCKING

Validates ADR follows the mandatory nested folder rule.

Nested Folder Rule: ALL ADR documents MUST be in nested folders.

Required Structure:

ADR Type Required Location

Monolithic docs/05_ADR/ADR-NN_{slug}/ADR-NN_{slug}.md

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-STR001 Error ADR not in nested folder (BLOCKING)

REV-STR002 Error Folder name doesn't match ADR ID

REV-STR003 Warning File name doesn't match folder name

This check is BLOCKING - ADR must pass structure validation before other checks proceed.

  1. Decision Completeness

Validates ADR has all required decision components.

Scope:

  • Context clearly stated

  • Decision explicitly documented

  • Rationale provided

  • Status defined

  • Date recorded

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-DC001 Error Context section missing or empty

REV-DC002 Error Decision not explicitly stated

REV-DC003 Error Rationale missing

REV-DC004 Warning Status not defined

REV-DC005 Warning Date not recorded

  1. BRD Topic Alignment

Validates ADR addresses BRD Section 7.2 topics.

Scope:

  • ADR maps to BRD ADR topic

  • Topic category correct (Infrastructure, Data, Security, etc.)

  • Decision matches topic requirements

  • All BRD topics have corresponding ADRs

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-BA001 Error ADR not linked to BRD topic

REV-BA002 Error Topic category mismatch

REV-BA003 Warning Decision doesn't fully address topic

REV-BA004 Info BRD topic not yet addressed by ADR

2a. Diagram Contract Compliance

Validates ADR diagram contract requirements defined by ai_dev_ssd_flow/DIAGRAM_STANDARDS.md .

Scope:

  • Required ADR tags: @diagram: c4-l3 and @diagram: sequence-*

  • Conditional @diagram: dfd-l2 check for data-impacting decisions

  • Intent header fields: diagram_type , level , scope_boundary , upstream_refs , downstream_refs

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-DC001 Error Missing required ADR diagram tag (@diagram: c4-l3 or @diagram: sequence-* )

REV-DC002 Warning Data-impacting ADR missing @diagram: dfd-l2

REV-DC003 Warning Diagram intent header missing required fields

  1. Consequence Coverage

Validates positive and negative consequences documented.

Scope:

  • Positive consequences listed

  • Negative consequences/trade-offs acknowledged

  • Risk assessment included

  • Mitigation strategies defined

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-CC001 Error No consequences documented

REV-CC002 Warning Only positive consequences (unrealistic)

REV-CC003 Warning Negative consequences without mitigation

REV-CC004 Info Risk assessment could be more detailed

  1. Alternative Evaluation

Validates alternatives were properly considered.

Scope:

  • Multiple alternatives evaluated

  • Comparison criteria defined

  • Trade-off analysis present

  • Rejection reasons documented

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-AE001 Error No alternatives considered

REV-AE002 Warning Only one alternative (insufficient)

REV-AE003 Warning Missing comparison criteria

REV-AE004 Info Alternative rejection reason unclear

  1. Cross-Reference Integrity

Validates links to related ADRs and documents.

Scope:

  • Related ADRs referenced

  • Superseded ADRs linked

  • BRD/PRD traceability tags present

  • External references valid

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-CR001 Error Broken cross-reference

REV-CR002 Warning Missing related ADR link

REV-CR003 Warning Superseded ADR not referenced

REV-CR004 Info External link unverified

  1. Placeholder Detection

Identifies incomplete content requiring replacement.

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-P001 Error [TODO] placeholder found

REV-P002 Error [TBD] placeholder found

REV-P003 Warning Template value not replaced

  1. Naming Compliance

Validates element IDs follow doc-naming standards.

Scope:

  • Element IDs use ADR.NN.TT.SS format

  • Element type codes valid for ADR (13, 14, 15, 16)

  • ADR numbering sequential

Error Codes:

Code Severity Description

REV-N001 Error Invalid element ID format

REV-N002 Error Element type code not valid for ADR

REV-N003 Warning ADR numbering gap detected

  1. Upstream Drift Detection (Mandatory Cache)

Detects when upstream source documents have been modified after the ADR was created or last updated.

The drift cache is mandatory. All drift detection operations must read from and write to the cache file. Reviewers must fail with REV-D006 if the cache file cannot be created or accessed.

Purpose: Identifies stale ADR content that may not reflect current BDD scenarios. When upstream documents change, the ADR may need updates to maintain alignment.

Upstream Documents:

  • BDD documents: Feature files and scenario definitions that ADR decisions must support

Scope:

  • @bdd: tag targets (BDD feature files)

  • Traceability section upstream artifact links

  • Any markdown links to ../04_BDD/

Drift Cache File (MANDATORY)

Location: docs/05_ADR/.drift_cache.json

Schema:

{ "cache_version": "1.0", "last_updated": "2026-02-10T17:00:00", "documents": { "ADR-01_authentication_strategy.md": { "adr_hash": "sha256:abc123...", "adr_updated": "2026-02-10T17:00:00", "upstream_refs": { "../../04_BDD/BDD-01_authentication.feature": { "hash": "sha256:def456...", "last_checked": "2026-02-10T17:00:00", "status": "current" } } } } }

Cache Requirements:

  • Cache file MUST be created on first review if it does not exist

  • Cache MUST be updated after every review run

  • Cache entries MUST include SHA-256 hashes for all upstream references

  • Stale cache entries (>30 days) MUST trigger re-validation

Three-Phase Detection Algorithm

PHASE 1: Cache Initialization

  1. Check if .drift_cache.json exists
  2. If not exists → create with empty documents object
  3. If exists → load and validate schema
  4. If schema invalid → backup and recreate

PHASE 2: Upstream Reference Extraction

  1. Extract all upstream references from ADR:

    • @bdd: tags → [path, scenario anchor]
    • Links to ../04_BDD/ → [path]
    • Traceability table upstream artifacts → [path]
  2. For each upstream reference: a. Resolve path to absolute file path b. Check file exists (already covered by Check #5) c. Read file content d. Compute SHA-256 hash of content

PHASE 3: Drift Comparison

  1. For each upstream reference: a. Look up cached hash for this reference b. If no cached hash → flag as NEW_REFERENCE c. If hash matches → status = "current" d. If hash differs → flag as CONTENT_DRIFT

  2. Calculate drift severity: a. Compare content size change percentage b. If >20% change → CRITICAL (REV-D005) c. If <20% change → WARNING (REV-D002)

  3. Update cache with new hashes and timestamps

Hash Calculation (MANDATORY BASH EXECUTION)

CRITICAL: You MUST execute actual bash commands to compute hashes. DO NOT write placeholder values.

Compute File Hash:

sha256sum <file_path> | cut -d' ' -f1

Store result as: "hash": "sha256:<64_hex_characters>"

Hash Format Validation:

Check Requirement

Prefix Must be sha256:

Length Exactly 64 hex characters after prefix

REJECTED VALUES (re-compute immediately):

  • sha256:verified_no_drift

  • sha256:pending_verification

  • pending_verification

  • Any value where hex portion != 64 characters

Verification After Cache Write:

grep -oP '"hash":\s*"sha256:[0-9a-f]{64}"' .drift_cache.json

Hash Scope:

  • Full file content for BDD feature files

  • Specific section content when anchor specified (e.g., #scenario-login )

Error Codes

Code Severity Description

REV-D001 Warning Upstream document modified after ADR creation

REV-D002 Warning Referenced section content has changed (hash mismatch)

REV-D003 Info Upstream document version incremented

REV-D004 Info New content added to upstream document

REV-D005 Error Critical upstream document substantially modified (>20% change)

REV-D006 Error Drift cache file cannot be created or accessed (mandatory)

REV-D009 Error Invalid hash placeholder detected (verified_no_drift , pending_verification )

Report Output

Upstream Drift Analysis

Cache Status: Active | Last Updated: 2026-02-10T17:00:00

Upstream DocumentADR ReferenceCurrent HashCached HashStatusSeverity
BDD-01_authentication.feature@bdd Section 3sha256:abc...sha256:def...DRIFTWarning
BDD-02_authorization.feature@bdd Section 5sha256:ghi...sha256:ghi...Current-

Drift Summary:

  • Documents checked: 2
  • Current: 1
  • Drifted: 1
  • Critical: 0

Recommendation: Review upstream changes and update ADR if decision context has changed.

Auto-Actions

  • Cache Update: Update .drift_cache.json with current hashes after every review

  • Drift Markers: Add [DRIFT] marker to affected @bdd tags (optional)

  • Report Generation: Include drift summary in review report

  • Cache Backup: Create .drift_cache.json.bak before updates

Configuration

Setting Default Description

cache_enabled

true Enable drift cache (Mandatory - cannot be disabled)

drift_threshold_days

7 Days before drift becomes Warning

critical_threshold_days

30 Days before drift becomes Error

tracked_patterns

@bdd:

Patterns to track for drift

cache_backup

true Create backup before cache updates

Review Score Calculation

Scoring Formula:

Category Weight Calculation

Decision Completeness 24% (complete_fields / required_fields) × 24

BRD Topic Alignment 19% (aligned_topics / total_topics) × 19

Consequence Coverage 19% (coverage_score) × 19

Alternative Evaluation 14% (alternatives_evaluated / 3) × 14

Cross-Reference Integrity 5% (valid_refs / total_refs) × 5

Placeholder Detection 5% (no_placeholders ? 5 : 5 - count)

Naming Compliance 9% (valid_ids / total_ids) × 9

Upstream Drift 5% (fresh_refs / total_refs) × 5

Total: Sum of all categories (max 100)

Thresholds:

  • PASS: ≥ 90

  • WARNING: 80-89

  • FAIL: < 80

Command Usage

Review specific ADR

/doc-adr-reviewer ADR-01

Review ADR by path

/doc-adr-reviewer docs/05_ADR/ADR-01_authentication_strategy.md

Review all ADRs

/doc-adr-reviewer all

Output Report

Review reports are stored alongside the reviewed document per project standards.

Nested Folder Rule: ALL ADRs use nested folders (ADR-NN_{slug}/ ) regardless of size. This ensures review reports, fix reports, and drift cache files are organized with their parent document.

Audit Wrapper Note: doc-adr-audit combines this reviewer output with validator findings and writes ADR-NN.A_audit_report_vNNN.md (preferred for fixer). Reviewer-native report naming remains ADR-NN.R_review_report_vNNN.md .

File Naming: ADR-NN.R_review_report_vNNN.md

Location: Inside the ADR nested folder: docs/05_ADR/ADR-NN_{slug}/

Versioning Rules

  • First Review: Creates ADR-NN.R_review_report_v001.md

  • Subsequent Reviews: Auto-increments version (v002, v003, etc.)

  • Same-Day Reviews: Each review gets unique version number

Version Detection: Scans folder for existing ADR-NN.R_review_report_v*.md files and increments.

Example:

docs/05_ADR/ADR-01_authentication_strategy/ ├── ADR-01_authentication_strategy.md ├── ADR-01.R_review_report_v001.md # First review ├── ADR-01.R_review_report_v002.md # After fixes └── .drift_cache.json

Delta Reporting

When previous reviews exist, include score comparison in the report.

See REVIEW_DOCUMENT_STANDARDS.md for complete versioning requirements.

Integration with doc-adr-autopilot

This skill is invoked during Phase 5 of doc-adr-autopilot :

flowchart LR A[Phase 4: Validation] --> B[Phase 5: Final Review] B --> C{doc-adr-reviewer} C --> D[Phase 6: Continue]

Related Skills

Skill Relationship

doc-naming

Naming standards for Check #7

doc-adr-autopilot

Invokes this skill in Phase 5

doc-adr-validator

Structural validation (Phase 4)

doc-adr-fixer

Applies fixes based on review findings

doc-adr

ADR creation rules

doc-bdd-reviewer

Upstream QA

doc-sys-autopilot

Downstream consumer

Version History

Version Date Changes

1.6 2026-02-27 Migrated frontmatter to metadata ; corrected nested-folder report paths to docs/05_ADR ; documented audit-wrapper contract with preferred ADR-NN.A_audit_report_vNNN.md output and legacy reviewer compatibility

1.5 2026-02-26 Aligned with ADR-MVP-TEMPLATE.md v1.1 (11-section MVP structure)

1.4 2026-02-11 Added Check #0: Structure Compliance (BLOCKING) - validates ADR follows mandatory nested folder rule; Added REV-STR001-003 error codes; Structure check blocks other checks if failed

1.3 2026-02-10 Made drift cache mandatory; Added REV-D006 error code for cache access failures; Three-phase detection algorithm; SHA-256 hash calculation with Python example; Updated cache schema with document-level tracking; Focused upstream on BDD documents only; Added cache status to report output

1.2 2026-02-10 Added Check #8: Upstream Drift Detection - detects when BDD/BRD documents modified after ADR creation; REV-D001-D005 error codes; drift cache support; configurable thresholds; Added doc-adr-fixer to Related Skills

1.1 2026-02-10 Added review versioning support (_vNNN pattern); Delta reporting for score comparison

1.0 2026-02-10 Initial skill creation with 7 review checks; Decision completeness; Consequence coverage; Alternative evaluation

Implementation Plan Consistency (IPLAN-004)

  • Treat plan-derived outputs as valid source mode and verify intent preservation from implementation plan scope/objectives.

  • Validate upstream autopilot precedence assumption: --iplan > --ref > --prompt .

  • Flag objective/scope conflicts between plan context and artifact output as blocking issues requiring clarification.

  • Do not introduce legacy fallback paths such as docs-v2.0/00_REF .

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

n8n

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

google-adk

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

doc-prd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

devops-flow

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review