vendor-contracts

Pragmatic review of software contracts: IP, liability, SLAs. Use when triaging vendor agreements (not legal advice).

Safety Notice

This listing is from the official public ClawHub registry. Review SKILL.md and referenced scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "vendor-contracts" with this command: npx skills add mike47512/vendor-contracts

Vendor Contracts

Structured guidance for software and vendor agreements (IP, liability, SLAs—not legal advice): confirm triggers, propose the stages below, and adapt if the user wants a lighter pass.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • User mentions MSA, order form, vendor agreement, contract review, or closely related work
  • They want a structured workflow rather than ad-hoc tips
  • They are preparing a review, rollout, or stakeholder communication

Initial offer: Explain the four stages briefly and ask whether to follow this workflow or work freeform. If they decline, continue in their preferred style.

Workflow Stages

Stage 1: Clarify context & goals

Anchor on deal type (SaaS, support, data processing) and risk appetite. Ask what success looks like and what must not break.

Stage 2: Structure & categories

Cover commercial, legal, security, data, and exit themes; flag unclear liability caps and indemnities for human counsel.

Stage 3: Draft & refine

Produce a red-flag summary and question list for legal/business owners—not definitive legal conclusions.

Stage 4: Verify & ship

Close the loop with owners, security review, and procurement steps as needed.

Checklist Before Completion

  • Goals and constraints are explicit for vendor contract review
  • Risks and trade-offs are stated, not hand-waved
  • Verification steps match the change’s impact (tests, canary, peer review)
  • Operational follow-through is covered (monitoring, docs, owners)

Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Be procedural: stage-by-stage, with clear exit criteria
  • Ask for missing context (environment, scale, deadlines) before prescribing
  • Prefer checklists and concrete examples over generic platitudes
  • If the user declines the workflow, switch to freeform help without lecturing

Handling Deviations

  • If the user wants to skip a stage: confirm and continue with what they need.
  • If context is missing: ask targeted questions before strong recommendations.
  • Prefer concrete examples, trade-offs, and verification steps over generic advice.

Quality Bar

  • Each recommendation should be actionable (what to do next).
  • Call out failure modes relevant to vendor agreements (security, scale, UX, or ops).
  • Keep tone direct and respectful of the user’s time.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

Ephemeral Media Hosting

自動削除機能付き一時メディアホスティングシステム

Registry SourceRecently Updated
General

Ethereum Read Only

Foundry castを使用したウォレット不要のオンチェーン状態読み取り

Registry SourceRecently Updated
General

OpenClaw Memory

Manage, optimize, and troubleshoot the OpenClaw memory system — MEMORY.md curation, daily logs (memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md), memory_search tuning, compaction survi...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
General

ImageRouter

Generate AI images with any model using ImageRouter API (requires API key).

Registry SourceRecently Updated
2.6K2dawe35