US-Iran War Situation Tracker Skill
This skill provides a focused methodology for gathering and verifying real-time intelligence on the US-Iran conflict. It is tailored to navigate the specific information landscape of this war, prioritizing actionable intelligence over general news.
Core Principle: Assume Disinformation & Triangulate
In this high-stakes conflict, all primary sources (both US/allies and Iran/allies) have a strong agenda. Information should only be considered credible after triangulation: corroboration by sources from an opposing side or confirmation by a reputable, neutral third party (like a major news agency).
3-Step Intelligence Cycle for the US-Iran War
Step 1: Define Intelligence Needs & Specific Keywords
A strict 6-hour time filter is mandatory for all searches. This skill is for near-real-time tracking, not historical analysis.
Entity & Event Keywords:
- Involved Parties:
US military,CENTCOM,Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC),Israel Defense Forces (IDF),Hezbollah,Houthi - Geographic Locations:
Persian Gulf,Strait of Hormuz,Red Sea,Indian Ocean,Tehran,Tel Aviv,Ali Al Salem Air Base(Kuwait),Jordan - Military Hardware & Operations:
IRIS Dena,Thaad system,ballistic missile,suicide drone,F-35,torpedo attack,cyber attack - Key Personnel:
Pete Hegseth(US Secretary of Defense),Abbas Araghchi(Iranian Foreign Minister)
Search Query Strategy:
- Action-Specific:
(US OR American) AND (sinks OR strikes OR hits) AND (Iran OR Iranian) AND (ship OR vessel OR submarine) - Location-Specific:
(Iran OR Iranian) AND (missile OR drone) AND (attack OR strike) AND (Israel OR Tel Aviv) - Official Statements:
site:defense.gov "Iran",site:en.mfa.ir "United States",site:idf.il "Iran" - Multi-lingual: Search key terms in English, Farsi (
جنگ ایران و آمریکا), and Hebrew (מלחמת איראן-ארצות הברית) to capture local perspectives.
Step 2: Consult Tiered Authoritative Sources for This Conflict
Prioritize sources based on their proximity to the events and their established neutrality.
| Tier | Source Type | Specific Examples for This Conflict | Purpose & How to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | US & Allies Primary Sources | defense.gov, centcom.mil, idf.il, state.gov | For official US/Israeli claims, statements, and footage. Treat as a claim to be verified. |
| 1B | Iran & Allies Primary Sources | en.mfa.ir, IRNA.ir, Tasnim News Agency, Press TV | For official Iranian/allied claims and counter-claims. Treat as a claim to be verified. |
| 2 | Global News Agencies | Reuters, Associated Press (AP), AFP | Crucial for triangulation. These agencies often have correspondents on the ground and are the first to provide independently verified reports. Use them to confirm or deny claims from Tier 1 sources. |
| 3 | Specialized & International Media | Al Jazeera, BBC News, The Guardian, New York Times | For in-depth analysis, context, and reports on secondary effects (e.g., civilian casualties, diplomatic efforts). Good for understanding the "why" behind the "what." |
| 4 | International & Humanitarian Orgs | un.org (UN News), icrc.org (Red Cross), amnesty.org | For information on civilian impact, human rights, and potential war crimes. |
Step 3: Synthesize & Report with Attribution
When presenting the findings, structure is key to clarity.
- Lead with Verified Facts: Start with information confirmed by Tier 2 sources or acknowledged by both sides.
- Present Competing Claims: Clearly separate uncorroborated claims, attributing them properly. Use phrasing like: "The US military claimed... while Iran's state media reported..." or "According to a statement from the IDF..."
- Structure by Theme: Organize the report into logical sections:
- Key Military Developments (Verified)
- Official Statements & Claims (US/Allies)
- Official Statements & Claims (Iran/Allies)
- Civilian & Humanitarian Impact
- International Reactions
- Maintain a 6-Hour Rolling Timeline: Keep a running, time-stamped log of major events. This helps track escalation and the sequence of actions and reactions.