empirical validation

"The code looks correct" is NOT validation.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "empirical validation" with this command: npx skills add toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity/toonight-get-shit-done-for-antigravity-empirical-validation

Empirical Validation

Core Principle

"The code looks correct" is NOT validation.

Every change must be verified with empirical evidence before being marked complete.

Validation Methods by Change Type

Change Type Required Validation Tool

UI Changes Screenshot showing expected visual state browser_subagent

API Endpoints Command showing correct response run_command

Build/Config Successful build or test output run_command

Data Changes Query showing expected data state run_command

File Operations File listing or content verification run_command

Validation Protocol

Before Marking Any Task "Done"

Identify Verification Criteria

  • What should be true after this change?

  • How can that be observed?

Execute Verification

  • Run the appropriate command or action

  • Capture the output/evidence

Document Evidence

  • Add to .gsd/JOURNAL.md under the task

  • Include actual output, not just "passed"

Confirm Against Criteria

  • Does evidence match expected outcome?

  • If not, task is NOT complete

Examples

API Endpoint Verification

Good: Actual test showing response

curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/login -d '{"email":"test@test.com"}'

Output: {"success":true,"token":"..."}

Bad: Just saying "endpoint works"

UI Verification

Good: Take screenshot with browser tool

  • Navigate to /dashboard
  • Capture screenshot
  • Confirm: Header visible? Data loaded? Layout correct?

Bad: "The component should render correctly"

Build Verification

Good: Show build output

npm run build

Output: Successfully compiled...

Bad: "Build should work now"

Forbidden Phrases

Never use these as justification for completion:

  • "This should work"

  • "The code looks correct"

  • "I've made similar changes before"

  • "Based on my understanding"

  • "It follows the pattern"

Integration

This skill integrates with:

  • /verify — Primary workflow using this skill

  • /execute — Must validate before marking tasks complete

  • Rule 4 in GEMINI.md — Empirical Validation enforcement

Failure Handling

If verification fails:

  • Do NOT mark task complete

  • Document the failure in .gsd/STATE.md

  • Create fix task if cause is known

  • Trigger Context Health Monitor if 3+ failures

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

gsd codebase mapper

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

gsd planner

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

gsd debugger

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

gsd verifier

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review