DevSecOps Roadmap Generator

Generates customized DevSecOps implementation roadmaps based on organizational assessment data and maturity level analysis.

Safety Notice

This listing is from the official public ClawHub registry. Review SKILL.md and referenced scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "DevSecOps Roadmap Generator" with this command: npx skills add krishnakumarmahadevan-cmd/toolweb-devsecops-roadmap

Overview

The DevSecOps Roadmap Generator is a strategic planning tool designed to help organizations establish and mature their security practices within the software development lifecycle. By analyzing 13 key assessment dimensions across people, processes, and technology, the tool produces a comprehensive implementation roadmap tailored to your organization's size, industry, and development methodology.

This API is ideal for security leaders, DevOps engineers, and engineering managers who need a data-driven approach to integrating security into their CI/CD pipelines. The generator evaluates your current maturity across critical areas including threat modeling, secure coding practices, automated testing, dependency management, and incident response, then delivers prioritized recommendations with specific tools and success metrics.

Organizations ranging from startups to enterprises use this tool to align stakeholders around a realistic security transformation strategy, establish measurable milestones, and allocate resources effectively for building a mature DevSecOps program.

Usage

Request Example:

{
  "assessmentData": {
    "step1": {
      "education": "Foundational",
      "workshops": "Quarterly",
      "platform": "LinkedIn Learning"
    },
    "step2": {
      "business_education": "Partial",
      "resources": "Limited"
    },
    "step3": {
      "culture": "Security-aware",
      "embedded": "Team-level"
    },
    "step4": {
      "scanning": "Manual",
      "remediation": "Ad-hoc"
    },
    "step5": {
      "requirements": "Basic",
      "documentation": "Incomplete"
    },
    "step6": {
      "quality_bars": "Informal"
    },
    "step7": {
      "threat_modeling": "None",
      "training": "Occasional"
    },
    "step8": {
      "safeguards": "Network-based"
    },
    "step9": {
      "deprecation": "Manual tracking",
      "response": "Reactive"
    },
    "step10": {
      "sast": "Not implemented",
      "local": "None"
    },
    "step11": {
      "dast": "Basic scanning",
      "local": "None"
    },
    "step12": {
      "fuzz": "Not in use"
    },
    "step13": {
      "manual": "Annual"
    },
    "context": {
      "org_size": "100-500",
      "industry": "FinTech",
      "methodology": "Agile",
      "challenges": "Legacy system integration, regulatory compliance"
    }
  },
  "sessionId": "sess-abc123xyz",
  "userId": 42,
  "timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}

Response Example:

{
  "maturity_score": 38,
  "maturity_level": "Initial",
  "executive_summary": "Your organization is at the Initial maturity level with foundational security awareness but limited automation and integration into development workflows. Immediate focus should be on establishing automated scanning, formalizing threat modeling practices, and building organizational security culture.",
  "immediate_priorities": [
    {
      "priority": 1,
      "action": "Implement SAST tooling in CI/CD pipeline",
      "effort": "Medium",
      "timeframe": "0-3 months"
    },
    {
      "priority": 2,
      "action": "Establish threat modeling workshops",
      "effort": "Low",
      "timeframe": "0-1 months"
    },
    {
      "priority": 3,
      "action": "Automate dependency scanning",
      "effort": "Medium",
      "timeframe": "1-3 months"
    }
  ],
  "short_term_goals": [
    {
      "goal": "Achieve 80% SAST coverage across codebases",
      "timeline": "6 months",
      "metrics": "Pull requests blocked by security issues"
    },
    {
      "goal": "Implement DAST in staging environment",
      "timeline": "6 months",
      "metrics": "Vulnerabilities found and remediated"
    },
    {
      "goal": "Complete threat modeling for 5 critical systems",
      "timeline": "3 months",
      "metrics": "Number of systems modeled"
    }
  ],
  "long_term_goals": [
    {
      "goal": "Achieve Managed/Optimized maturity level",
      "timeline": "18-24 months",
      "metrics": "Overall maturity score increase to 75+"
    },
    {
      "goal": "Full shift-left security integration",
      "timeline": "12-18 months",
      "metrics": "100% automation coverage for scanning"
    },
    {
      "goal": "Establish continuous compliance monitoring",
      "timeline": "12 months",
      "metrics": "Real-time compliance dashboard"
    }
  ],
  "step_analysis": [
    {
      "step": 1,
      "category": "Education & Awareness",
      "current_state": "Foundational",
      "gap": "Need specialized DevSecOps training programs"
    },
    {
      "step": 4,
      "category": "Dependency & Build Security",
      "current_state": "Manual",
      "gap": "Requires automated scanning integration"
    }
  ],
  "recommended_tools": [
    "SonarQube (SAST)",
    "OWASP Dependency-Check",
    "Snyk (dependency scanning)",
    "GitLab/GitHub security scanning",
    "Threat Dragon (threat modeling)",
    "Burp Suite Community (DAST)"
  ],
  "success_metrics": "Key metrics include: SAST/DAST detection rate, time-to-remediation, security training completion rates, vulnerability density per 1K LOC, and overall maturity score progression targeting 10-15 points per quarter.",
  "sessionId": "sess-abc123xyz",
  "timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:45Z"
}

Endpoints

GET /

Summary: Root

Description: Health check endpoint

Parameters: None

Response:

200 OK
Content-Type: application/json

POST /api/devsecops/roadmap

Summary: Generate Roadmap

Description: Generate a customized DevSecOps implementation roadmap based on organizational assessment data.

Parameters:

NameTypeRequiredDescription
assessmentDataobjectYesStructured assessment data containing 13 steps (step1–step13) and contextual information about organization size, industry, development methodology, and challenges.
sessionIdstringYesUnique identifier for the assessment session, used for tracking and audit purposes.
userIdintegerNoOptional user identifier for associating the roadmap generation with a specific user account.
timestampstringNoOptional ISO 8601 formatted timestamp indicating when the assessment was conducted.

Assessment Data Structure:

The assessmentData object contains the following required fields:

  • step1 (object): Education & Awareness - education, workshops, platform
  • step2 (object): Business Alignment - business_education, resources
  • step3 (object): Culture & Embedding - culture, embedded
  • step4 (object): Dependency & Build Security - scanning, remediation
  • step5 (object): Requirements & Design - requirements, documentation
  • step6 (object): Quality Gates - quality_bars
  • step7 (object): Threat Modeling & Design Review - threat_modeling, training
  • step8 (object): Runtime Safeguards - safeguards
  • step9 (object): Deprecation & Incident Response - deprecation, response
  • step10 (object): SAST Integration - sast, local
  • step11 (object): DAST Integration - dast, local
  • step12 (object): Fuzzing - fuzz
  • step13 (object): Manual Testing - manual
  • context (object): Organizational context - org_size (required), industry (required), methodology (required), challenges (optional)

Response Schema:

FieldTypeDescription
maturity_scoreintegerNumerical score (0-100) indicating current DevSecOps maturity level.
maturity_levelstringCategorical maturity level: Initial, Developing, Managed, or Optimized.
executive_summarystringHigh-level narrative overview of current state and strategic recommendations.
immediate_prioritiesarrayList of highest-priority actions to implement within 0-3 months.
short_term_goalsarrayGoals targeted for achievement within 6 months.
long_term_goalsarrayStrategic goals for 12-24 month timeframe.
step_analysisarrayDetailed analysis of gaps and recommendations for each assessment step.
recommended_toolsarrayList of specific security tools and platforms recommended for your organization.
success_metricsstringNarrative description of key performance indicators and measurement strategy.
sessionIdstringEchoed session identifier for audit and tracking.
timestampstringISO 8601 timestamp of response generation.

HTTP Status Codes:

CodeDescription
200Successful roadmap generation with complete response payload.
422Validation error in request structure or required fields missing.

GET /health

Summary: Health Check

Description: Health check endpoint to verify service availability and readiness.

Parameters: None

Response:

200 OK
Content-Type: application/json

Pricing

PlanCalls/DayCalls/MonthPrice
Free550Free
Developer20500$39/mo
Professional2005,000$99/mo
Enterprise100,0001,000,000$299/mo

About

ToolWeb.in - 200+ security APIs, CISSP & CISM, platforms: Pay-per-run, API Gateway, MCP Server, OpenClaw, RapidAPI, YouTube.

References

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

jirac

Jira issue management skill for OpenClaw using the jirac CLI. Requires the `jirac` binary to be installed and authenticated before use. Use when listing, vie...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
Coding

Clickup

Clickup integration. Manage project management and ticketing data, records, and workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Clickup data.

Registry SourceRecently Updated
Coding

DingTalk Workspace CLI

管理钉钉产品能力(AI表格/日历/通讯录/群聊与机器人/待办/审批/考勤/日志/DING消息/开放平台文档/钉钉文档/钉钉云盘/AI听记/邮箱等)。当用户需要操作表格数据、管理日程会议、查询通讯录、管理群聊、机器人发消息、创建待办、提交审批、查看考勤、提交日报周报(钉钉日志模版)、读写钉钉文档、上传下载云盘文件、...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
Coding

Mistral Mcp Openclaw

Configure OpenClaw to use the community mistral-mcp stdio server for Mistral OCR, Codestral FIM, Voxtral audio, moderation, classification, files, batch, and...

Registry SourceRecently Updated