team-code

Coordinate multiple AI agents as a development team to tackle complex coding projects faster and more accurately. Like having a team of engineers working in parallel on different parts of your codebase—each in their own isolated branch, with automatic integration and verification. Use for multi-file features, complex refactors, or any project where parallel development beats solo coding. Works like pair programming, but with as many agents as your task needs (2-4 recommended, max 8).

Safety Notice

This listing is from the official public ClawHub registry. Review SKILL.md and referenced scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "team-code" with this command: npx skills add simoncatbot/team-code

Team Code - Multi-Agent Development

Team Code implements the CAID (Centralized Asynchronous Isolated Delegation) research paradigm for coordinating multiple AI agents as a development team.

Think of it like this: instead of one developer working alone on a complex feature, you have a team of specialists working in parallel—each in their own isolated workspace, with a tech lead (manager) coordinating who works on what and when.

⚠️ CRITICAL WARNINGS:

  • Use Team Code from the start — Don't try solo first. Sequential attempts cost nearly 2x with minimal gain.
  • Physical branch isolation is mandatory — Shared workspaces cause silent conflicts that break everything.
  • Team size matters — 2 agents for research tasks, 4 for clear codebases, never exceed 8.
  • Higher cost, better results — Team Code improves accuracy (+26%), not speed. Worth it for important code.

The Analogy: Human Dev Team

Human TeamTeam Code
Tech lead assigns tasksManager builds dependency graph
Developers work in branchesAgents work in git worktrees
Pull requests for reviewSelf-verification before commit
Merge conflicts resolved by authorAgent resolves their own conflicts
Code review before shippingManager final review

When to Use Team Code

Perfect for:

  • 🏗️ Building features that touch multiple files (auth, API, database)
  • 🔄 Complex refactors with clear dependency chains
  • 📚 Implementing libraries from scratch with test suites
  • 🔬 Research reproductions (paper implementations)

Skip for:

  • 🔧 One-line fixes or single-file changes
  • 🧪 Pure exploration without clear structure
  • ⏱️ Quick prototypes where "good enough" is fine

The Workflow

Phase 0: Setup (Manager = You)

Before the team starts, prepare the environment:

cd your-project

# Ensure dependencies work
pip install -r requirements.txt  # or npm install, etc.

# Create minimal stubs so imports don't fail
mkdir -p src/feature
touch src/feature/__init__.py src/feature/module_a.py src/feature/module_b.py

# Commit so team starts from known state
git add .
git commit -m "setup: initial feature structure"

Phase 1: Plan (Dependency Graph)

Analyze what needs to be built and in what order:

Your Task: "Add user authentication"

Dependencies:
  database.py ─→ models.py ─→ auth.py ─→ api.py
     (none)      (needs db)   (needs    (needs
                               models)   auth)

Round 1: database.py (foundation)
Round 2: models.py (depends on db)
Round 3: auth.py (depends on models)
Round 4: api.py (depends on auth)

Phase 2: Delegate to Agents

// Agent 1: Database (no dependencies)
await sessions_spawn({
  runtime: "subagent",
  task: `
    Implement database connection in src/feature/database.py
    - connect() function
    - Connection pooling
    - Error handling
    
    VERIFY: pytest tests/test_database.py -v
    RESTRICTED: src/feature/__init__.py
  `,
  agentId: "coding-agent",
  mode: "run",
  runTimeoutSeconds: 400
});
// Agent 2: Models (after database completes)
await sessions_spawn({
  runtime: "subagent",
  task: `
    Implement User model in src/feature/models.py
    - User class with SQLAlchemy
    - Fields: id, username, email, password_hash
    - Methods: set_password(), check_password()
    
    DEPENDS ON: database module (completed)
    VERIFY: pytest tests/test_models.py -v
    RESTRICTED: src/feature/__init__.py, src/feature/database.py
  `,
  agentId: "coding-agent",
  mode: "run",
  runTimeoutSeconds: 400
});

Phase 3: Integrate

# When agent signals completion
git checkout main
git merge feature/database

# If conflict - agent who created it resolves:
cd ../workspace-database
git pull origin main
# fix conflicts
pytest tests/test_database.py -v
git commit --amend

Phase 4: Final Review

# After all rounds complete
git checkout main
pytest tests/ -v                    # Full test suite
python -c "from src.feature import auth; print('OK')"  # Smoke test

Team Size Guide

Task TypeTeam SizeWhy
Research/paper reproduction2Complex dependencies, manager heavy
Library implementation4Clear file structure, parallelizable
API + frontend feature2-3Frontend/backend parallel
Simple multi-file refactor2Limited parallelism
Never exceed8Coordination tax exceeds gains

Key Principles

1. Branch Isolation is Mandatory

# CORRECT: Physical isolation
git worktree add ../workspace-agent-1 feature/task-1
git worktree add ../workspace-agent-2 feature/task-2

# WRONG: Soft isolation (leads to conflicts)
# All agents in same directory with "don't touch each other's files"

2. Self-Verification Before Commit

Agent must run tests and fix failures BEFORE submitting:

pytest tests/test_my_module.py -v  # Must pass
git commit -m "implement: feature X"  # Only then

3. Structured Communication Only

Use JSON task specs, not conversation:

{
  "task_id": "implement-auth",
  "description": "JWT authentication",
  "files": ["src/auth/jwt.py"],
  "verify": "pytest tests/test_jwt.py -v",
  "restricted": ["src/auth/__init__.py"]
}

4. Agent Resolves Their Own Conflicts

If merge fails, the agent who wrote the code fixes it—not the manager.

Common Patterns

Pattern: Sequential Dependencies

A ─→ B ─→ C ─→ D

Start 1 agent, when done start next. Not parallel but structured.

Pattern: Parallel Foundation

  ┌──→ A ──→ C ─┐
  │              ├──→ E
  └──→ B ──→ D ─┘

A and B parallel, then C and D parallel, then E.

Pattern: Star (Common API Structure)

    ┌──→ Endpoint A
    │
DB ─┼──→ Endpoint B
    │
    └──→ Endpoint C

Database first, then all endpoints in parallel.

Trade-offs

AspectSolo AgentTeam Code
SpeedFaster wall-clockSimilar/slower
Accuracy42-57%59-68% (+14-26%)
CostLowerHigher
Best forQuick fixesImportant code

Rule of thumb: If you'd assign this to a human team, use Team Code.

Quick Start Template

// 1. Setup your project
cd my-project
git checkout -b feature/xyz

// 2. Create stubs
touch src/module.py
git add . && git commit -m "setup: stubs"

// 3. Plan dependencies
// Draw: what depends on what?

// 4. Spawn first agent (foundation)
const agent1 = await sessions_spawn({
  runtime: "subagent",
  task: "Implement foundation: src/core.py with...",
  mode: "run",
  timeoutSeconds: 400
});

// 5. Wait, integrate, repeat
await waitFor(agent1);
git merge feature/core;

// 6. Spawn dependent agents...

// 7. Final review
git checkout main
pytest tests/ -v

References

  • Research paper: "Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agents" (arXiv:2603.21489v1)
  • Original name: CAID (Centralized Asynchronous Isolated Delegation)
  • GitHub: https://github.com/JiayiGeng/async-swe-agents

See references/examples.md for detailed implementation examples.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

Team Collaboration Skill

快速搭建多 Agent 协作系统。创建产品/研发/运营团队,支持持久化、任务路由、知识提取、并行协作。

Registry Source
4731Profile unavailable
Security

Subagent Architecture

Advanced patterns for specialized subagent orchestration with production-ready reference implementations. Security isolation, phased implementation, peer col...

Registry Source
4930Profile unavailable
Coding

Claw Multi Agent

Claw Multi Agent enables parallel multi-agent orchestration for faster, comprehensive research, model comparison, and code pipelines, saving 50-65% time.

Registry SourceRecently Updated
6531Profile unavailable
Coding

GitHub Team Collaboration

GitHub team collaboration toolkit for managing team workflows, code reviews, issue tracking, sprint planning, and team metrics. Supports PR automation, issue...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
980Profile unavailable