asc-review-detail

Manage App Store review contact info and demo account settings using the `asc` CLI tool. Use this skill when: (1) Getting current review info: "asc version-review-detail get --version-id ID" (2) Setting review contact info before submission: "asc version-review-detail update --version-id ID ..." (3) Configuring demo account credentials for App Review team (4) User asks "set review info", "add review contact", "configure demo account", "fix reviewContactCheck" (5) Diagnosing a failed reviewContactCheck from asc versions check-readiness

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "asc-review-detail" with this command: npx skills add tddworks/asc-cli-skills/tddworks-asc-cli-skills-asc-review-detail

asc version-review-detail

Manage App Store review information (contact details + demo account) for a version. Required before submission — the App Review team needs contact info to reach you if there's an issue.

Commands

get — fetch current review info

asc version-review-detail get --version-id <VERSION_ID> [--pretty]

Returns an empty record (id: "") when review info has never been set.

update — set or update review info (upsert)

asc version-review-detail update --version-id <VERSION_ID> \
  [--contact-first-name <name>] \
  [--contact-last-name <name>] \
  [--contact-phone <phone>] \
  [--contact-email <email>] \
  [--demo-account-required <true|false>] \
  [--demo-account-name <username>] \
  [--demo-account-password <password>] \
  [--notes <text>]

Upsert: Creates a new record if none exists (POST), patches the existing one if it does (PATCH). Only supplied flags are sent — unspecified fields are left unchanged on an existing record.

Typical Pre-Submission Workflow

# 1. Check what's currently set
asc version-review-detail get --version-id <VERSION_ID> --pretty

# 2. Set contact info (minimum to clear reviewContactCheck warning)
asc version-review-detail update --version-id <VERSION_ID> \
  --contact-first-name Jane \
  --contact-email dev@example.com \
  --contact-phone "+1-555-0100"

# 3. If app requires a demo account
asc version-review-detail update --version-id <VERSION_ID> \
  --demo-account-required true \
  --demo-account-name demo_user \
  --demo-account-password "secret" \
  --notes "Tap 'Sign In' then use the credentials above"

# 4. Verify check-readiness passes reviewContactCheck
asc versions check-readiness --version-id <VERSION_ID> --pretty

# 5. Submit
asc versions submit --version-id <VERSION_ID>

JSON Output Shape

{
  "data": [
    {
      "affordances": {
        "getReviewDetail":    "asc version-review-detail get --version-id <id>",
        "updateReviewDetail": "asc version-review-detail update --version-id <id>"
      },
      "contactEmail": "dev@example.com",
      "contactFirstName": "Jane",
      "contactLastName": "Smith",
      "contactPhone": "+1-555-0100",
      "demoAccountRequired": false,
      "id": "rd-abc123",
      "versionId": "<VERSION_ID>"
    }
  ]
}

Nil optional fields (contactFirstName, contactEmail, demoAccountName, notes, etc.) are omitted from JSON output.

Reading reviewContactCheck in check-readiness

"reviewContactCheck": { "pass": false, "message": "Review contact info is missing" }

This is a SHOULD FIX warning — it does NOT block isReadyToSubmit. Fix it with:

# Copy updateReviewDetail affordance from version-review-detail get output
asc version-review-detail update --version-id <id> --contact-email dev@example.com --contact-phone "+1-555-0100"

Key Computed Properties

PropertyLogic
hasContactcontactEmail != nil && contactPhone != nil
demoAccountConfigured!demoAccountRequired || (name != nil && password != nil)

hasContact feeds reviewContactCheck.pass in asc versions check-readiness.

CAEOAS Affordances

AppStoreVersion includes getReviewDetail — follow it from any version listing:

VERSION=$(asc versions list --app-id "$APP_ID" | jq -r '.data[0]')
eval "$(echo "$VERSION" | jq -r '.affordances.getReviewDetail') --pretty"

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

asc-beta-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

asc-plugins

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

asc-reports

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

asc-app-infos

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review