Sprint Retrospective
When to use this skill
-
End of sprint: at the end of each sprint
-
Project milestone: after major releases
-
Team issues: when an immediate retrospective is needed
Instructions
Step 1: Start-Stop-Continue
Retrospective Template: Start-Stop-Continue
START (Start doing)
- Make daily standups shorter (within 5 minutes)
- Use a code review checklist
- Introduce pair programming
STOP (Stop doing)
- Deploying on Friday afternoons (rollback risk)
- Overusing emergency meetings
- Adding features without documentation
CONTINUE (Keep doing)
- Weekly tech sharing session
- Automated tests
- Transparent communication
Action Items
- Change standup time from 9:00 → 9:30 (Team Lead)
- Write a code review checklist document (Developer A)
- Announce the "no Friday deployments" rule (Team Lead)
Step 2: Mad-Sad-Glad
Retrospective: Mad-Sad-Glad
MAD (What made us mad)
- Urgent bugs after deployment (twice)
- Requirements changed frequently
- Unstable test environment
SAD (What we wished went better)
- Not enough time for code reviews
- Documentation lagged behind
- Accumulating tech debt
GLAD (What made us glad)
- New team members onboarded quickly
- CI/CD pipeline stabilized
- Positive customer feedback
Action Items
- Strengthen the deployment checklist
- Improve the requirements change process
- Reserve documentation time every Friday
Step 3: 4Ls (Liked-Learned-Lacked-Longed For)
Retrospective: 4Ls
LIKED (What we liked)
- Great teamwork
- Successfully adopted a new tech stack
LEARNED (What we learned)
- Standardize the local environment with Docker Compose
- Improve server state management with React Query
LACKED (What we lacked)
- Performance testing
- Mobile support
LONGED FOR (What we longed for)
- Better developer tools
- External training opportunities
Action Items
- Automatically measure performance by introducing Lighthouse CI
- Write responsive design guidelines
Output format
Retrospective document
Sprint [N] Retrospective
Date: 2025-01-15 Participants: Team Member A, B, C, D Format: Start-Stop-Continue
What Went Well
- Completed all stories (Velocity: 25 points)
- 0 bugs
- Great team morale
What Didn't Go Well
- Tech spike took longer than expected
- Rework due to design changes
Action Items
- Assign tech spikes to a dedicated sprint (Team Lead, ~01/20)
- Introduce a pre-review process for designs (Designer, ~01/18)
- Share the velocity chart (Scrum Master, weekly)
Key Metrics
- Velocity: 25 points
- Bugs Found: 0
- Sprint Goal Achievement: 100%
Constraints
Required Rules (MUST)
-
Safe Space: a blame-free environment
-
Action Items: must be specific and actionable
-
Follow-up: check progress in the next retrospective
Prohibited (MUST NOT)
-
Personal attacks: improve the process, not the person
-
Too many actions: limit to 2-3
Best practices
-
Time-box: within 1 hour
-
Rotate Facilitator: team members take turns facilitating
-
Celebrate Wins: celebrate successes too
References
-
Retrospective Formats
-
Agile Retrospectives
Metadata
Version
-
Current version: 1.0.0
-
Last updated: 2025-01-01
-
Supported platforms: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini
Tags
#retrospective #agile #scrum #team-improvement #project-management
Examples
Example 1: Basic usage
Example 2: Advanced usage