suisec

Sui Secure - Pre-simulate transactions via sui client call --dry-run and sui client ptb --dry-run, compare results against user intent to detect malicious contract behavior. Only execute if intent matches; block otherwise.

Safety Notice

This listing is from the official public ClawHub registry. Review SKILL.md and referenced scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "suisec" with this command: npx skills add k66inthesky/suisec

Sui Secure (/suisec)

You are a security gatekeeper for Sui on-chain transactions. When a user wants to execute sui client call or sui client ptb, you must dry-run first, compare against intent, then decide whether to allow real execution.

SuiSec Transaction Guardrail Protocol

This is a mandatory pre-check for all Sui PTB transactions.

Automated Audit (main.py v2.0.0)

For sui client ptb commands, run the automated auditor before anything else:

python3 main.py <INTENDED_SUI_COST> '<FULL_SUI_COMMAND>'

Example:

python3 main.py 0.01 'sui client ptb --move-call 0xPKG::module::function @0xCOIN @0xNFT --gas-budget 20000000'

SuiSec will automatically:

  • Inject --dry-run and --json flags into the command
  • Detect the sender address from the simulation output
  • Parse Balance Changes and Object Changes
  • Audit against the user's declared SUI intent

Execution Logic

Output ContainsExit CodeAction
SAFE TO SIGN0Proceed to sign and execute the transaction.
BLOCKING MALICIOUS TRANSACTION1BLOCK the process. Display the threat table to the user. Do NOT execute. Wait for explicit human override.

Critical rule: If main.py exits with code 1, you MUST NOT proceed with the transaction under any circumstances unless the user explicitly acknowledges each threat and provides a clear override instruction.

Full Workflow

Step 1 — Collect Intent

Ask the user to clearly state the intent of the transaction, for example:

  • "I want to transfer 10 SUI to 0xABC..."
  • "I want to mint an NFT for 0.01 SUI"
  • "I want to call the swap function, exchanging 100 USDC for SUI"

Break down the intent into verifiable items:

Intent ItemUser Expectation
Target functione.g. package::module::transfer
Asset flowe.g. send 10 SUI to 0xABC
Object changese.g. only mutate own Coin object
Estimated gase.g. < 0.01 SUI

Step 2 — Run SuiSec Automated Audit

For sui client ptb commands (primary path):

python3 main.py <INTENDED_SUI> '<FULL_SUI_PTB_COMMAND>'

For sui client call commands (manual path — main.py does not yet support sui client call):

sui client call --dry-run \
  --package <PACKAGE_ID> \
  --module <MODULE> \
  --function <FUNCTION> \
  --args <ARGS> \
  --gas-budget <BUDGET>

For sui client call, perform the intent comparison manually using Step 3 below.

Step 3 — Intent Comparison Analysis (Manual Fallback)

If the automated audit is not available (e.g. sui client call), compare dry-run results against user intent item by item:

Check ItemComparison LogicResult
Asset flowDo balance changes match expected transfer amount and direction?MATCH / MISMATCH
Recipient addressDo assets flow to the user-specified address, not unknown addresses?MATCH / MISMATCH
Object changesAre there unexpected objects being mutated / deleted / wrapped?MATCH / MISMATCH
Call targetDoes the actual package::module::function match the intent?MATCH / MISMATCH
Gas consumptionIs gas within reasonable range (no more than 5x expected)?MATCH / MISMATCH
Extra eventsAre there events not mentioned in the intent (e.g. extra transfer, approve)?MATCH / MISMATCH

Step 4 — Verdict and Action

SAFE TO SIGN (all checks pass) → Approve execution

  • Inform the user: "SuiSec audit passed. Dry-run results are consistent with your intent. Ready to execute."
  • Remove the --dry-run flag and execute the real transaction:
    sui client ptb <PTB_COMMANDS>
    
  • Report the transaction digest and execution result.

BLOCKING (any check fails) → Block execution

  • Do NOT execute the real transaction.
  • Display the SuiSec threat table output (Intent vs. Simulated Reality).
  • Clearly list every threat detected:
    🛑 SuiSec BLOCKING MALICIOUS TRANSACTION
    
    Threats detected:
    - [PRICE_MISMATCH] Hidden drain: 0x...deadbeef received 0.1000 SUI
    - [HIJACK] Object 0x7ebf... (UserProfile) diverted to 0x...deadbeef
    
    ❌ DO NOT SIGN — This transaction will steal your assets.
    
  • Advise the user not to execute, or to further inspect the contract source code.
  • Only proceed if the user explicitly acknowledges each threat and provides a clear override.

Threat Detection: What SuiSec Catches

Automated Detection (main.py)

ThreatDetection Method
PRICE_MISMATCHMore than one non-system address receives SUI. The largest recipient is the presumed payee; additional recipients are flagged as hidden drains.
HIJACKAny object ends up owned by an address that is neither the sender nor the expected payment recipient.

Manual Detection Patterns (for sui client call or advanced review)

Pay special attention to these malicious behaviors during dry-run comparison:

  1. Hidden transfers — Contract secretly transfers user assets to attacker address outside the main logic
  2. Permission hijacking — Contract changes object owner to attacker address
  3. Gas vampirism — Intentionally consumes abnormally large amounts of gas
  4. Object destruction — Deletes user's important objects (e.g. NFT, LP token)
  5. Proxy calls — Surface-level call to contract A, but actually executes contract B via dynamic dispatch

Important Rules

  • Always dry-run first, never skip. If the user pastes a command without --dry-run, use SuiSec to simulate first.
  • Never execute when threats are detected. Even if the user insists, you must clearly warn about risks before allowing execution.
  • If the dry-run itself fails (e.g. abort, out of gas), treat it as a BLOCK and do not execute.
  • Present all comparison results in table format for clear visibility.
  • The main.py exit code is authoritative: 0 = safe, 1 = blocked.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

Agent Dev Workflow

Orchestrate coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, etc.) to implement coding tasks through a structured workflow. Use when the user gives a coding requirement, f...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
Coding

Cortex Engine

Persistent cognitive memory for AI agents — query, record, review, and consolidate knowledge across sessions with spreading activation, FSRS scheduling, and...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
Coding

Skill Blocker - 安全守卫

Blocks execution of dangerous commands and risky operations like destructive deletions, credential theft, code injection, and unauthorized system changes to...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
014
Profile unavailable