Spaced Repetition Skill (FSRS-6)
Adaptive flashcard review system using the FSRS-6 algorithm — the state of the art in spaced repetition scheduling, backed by 130+ years of memory research.
Algorithm: FSRS (Free Spaced Repetition Scheduler) by Ye et al., 2024. Open-source reference: open-spaced-repetition/py-fsrs (MIT).
Origin: Developed and refined through the Formation Fellowship program. The author is not a representative of Formation.
Card File
Cards live in a user-specified markdown file. If not specified, ask once.
Card Format
Each card is a markdown section (### Title) with metadata:
### Binary Search on Answer Space
- **Priority:** P1
- **Prompt:** "Given items of various sizes and N recipients, find the largest
portion so everyone gets at least one. Approach?"
- **Answer:** Binary search on the answer space [1, max(items)]. Feasibility
predicate: sum(item // size for item in items) >= recipients. Return hi.
- **Interrogate:** When would two pointers beat this? What makes the predicate
monotonic?
- **When to reach for it:** "Maximize/minimize a value subject to a feasibility
check" — binary search on the answer.
- **FSRS:** d=5.50 s=8.20 reps=3 lapses=0 last=2026-03-11 next=2026-03-19
- **History:** [2026-03-04 G=3(Good), 2026-03-09 G=1(Again), 2026-03-11 G=3(Good)]
FSRS fields:
d= difficulty [1–10] (lower is easier)s= stability in days (≈ days until 90% recall probability)reps= total reviewslapses= times forgotten (rated Again)last/next= last review date / scheduled next review
Rating scale:
- 1 = "Didn't know it" (blanked or completely wrong)
- 2 = "Struggled" (got there but with significant difficulty or errors)
- 3 = "Got it" (recalled correctly with some effort)
- 4 = "Nailed it" (instant, effortless recall)
Review Methodology
Each review should cycle through multiple modes — not just recall:
- Recall — Explain the approach without looking (mental rehearsal)
- Interrogate — Why this approach? Tradeoffs? What changes if requirements change?
- Rewrite — Code/apply it cold, timed. Notice hesitations.
- Retain — Revisit 48+ hours later. Can't reproduce cleanly? → Rate Again (1).
❌ Skipping post-recall phases = 80% effort for 50% results.
Priority guide:
- P1: Fundamental, comes up everywhere. Review first.
- P2: Common pattern, transferable. Review second.
- P3: Good to know, niche. Skip if time-capped.
Scripts
All scripts in scripts/ — pure Python 3.6+, no external dependencies.
Check what's due
python scripts/due_cards.py ~/my-cards.md
python scripts/due_cards.py ~/my-cards.md --all # include upcoming
python scripts/due_cards.py ~/my-cards.md --date 2026-03-20 # plan ahead
Submit a review
python scripts/review.py ~/my-cards.md "Binary Search" 3
# Ratings: 1="Didn't know it" 2="Struggled" 3="Got it" 4="Nailed it"
Run algorithm self-test
python scripts/fsrs.py
Handling User Requests
"What's due today?" / "Show my queue"
Run due_cards.py. Present P1 cards prominently.
"I reviewed [card] — rated [X]"
Run review.py. Show updated stability and next interval.
If they forgot (Again), normalize it — it's data, not failure.
"Add a new card for [topic]"
Insert a new section in their card file. Do NOT add the FSRS line — it gets created automatically on first review.
Template:
### [Title]
- **Priority:** [P1/P2/P3]
- **Prompt:** "[Question]"
- **Answer:** [Key insight + approach]
- **Interrogate:** [Tradeoffs? What if requirements change?]
- **When to reach for it:** [Pattern/signal that triggers this approach]
- **Added:** [date]
- **History:** []
"How is my retention?" / "Stats"
Parse card file and compute: strong cards (s>30d), struggling cards (lapses>0), 7-day review load forecast.
Interpreting FSRS Numbers (Advanced)
Most users don't need this — the system handles scheduling automatically. For the curious:
- Stability (s): Days until ~90% recall. s=10 → review in ~10 days.
- Difficulty (d): 1=very easy, 10=very hard. Good cards converge to 3–6.
- After "Didn't know it": Stability drops sharply (e.g., 20d → 3d). Correct behavior.
- After "Nailed it": Stability grows fast. Use sparingly — only for instant recall.
- Key insight: At 90% retention target, interval ≈ stability.
Algorithm Reference
See references/fsrs-algorithm.md for full FSRS math, formulas, and default
weights. Algorithm paper: Ye et al., "A Stochastic Shortest Path Algorithm for
Optimizing Spaced Repetition Scheduling" (2024).