deep-research

Use when researching, investigating, or exploring a topic systematically with orthogonal multi-dimensional coverage and source-quality tiers. Trigger phrases include "research this deeply", "deep research on", "investigate this topic thoroughly", "explore this topic", "systematic research", "multi-dimensional research", "comprehensive research", "cover all angles of", "thorough research on", "deep dive into (research)", "exhaustive research". Spawns parallel agents across WHO/WHAT/HOW/WHERE/WHEN/WHY/LIMITS with risk-stratified spot-checking. Bounded by a user-controlled round budget with honest coverage reporting on what was and wasn't covered.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from SkillsMP metadata and should be treated as untrusted until upstream source review is completed.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "deep-research" with this command: npx skills add npow/skillsmp-npow-npow-deep-research

No markdown body

This source entry does not include full markdown content beyond metadata.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Open in GitHub

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Research

deep-debug

Use when a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior needs diagnosing — including production incidents, regressions, stack traces, mysterious failures, flaky tests, or any symptom needing root-cause analysis. Trigger phrases include "debug this", "why is this failing", "find the bug", "fix the bug", "root cause", "what's wrong with", "this is broken", "diagnose", "troubleshoot", "investigate this failure", "the test is failing", "this used to work", "why doesn't this work", "where's the bug". Adversarial hypothesis-driven debugging with parallel competing hypotheses across orthogonal dimensions, blind independent judging, discriminating probes that falsify leaders, TDD-gated fix loops, and mandatory architectural escalation after 3 failed attempts.

Repository SourceNeeds Review

-3npow

Research

flaky-test-diagnoser

Systematically diagnoses why a test is flaky by running multi-run experiments, isolation tests, ordering permutations, and timing analysis. Use when the user says a test is flaky, intermittent, non-deterministic, randomly failing, passes sometimes, or asks to debug test flakiness.

Repository SourceNeeds Review

-3npow

Security

autopilot

Use when running full-lifecycle autonomous execution from a vague idea to working verified code — idea to battle-tested design to consensus plan to executed code to audited defects to three independent judge verdicts to honest completion report. Trigger phrases include "autopilot", "build me end to end", "full lifecycle", "idea to working code", "auto-run this project", "run this autonomously", "just build it", "go from idea to code", "do everything", "autonomous execution", "end-to-end build", "build this for me", "make it real end to end", "full autonomous build". Iron-law phase gates between every stage; no coordinator self-approval; honest termination labels.

Repository SourceNeeds Review

-3npow

Coding

deep-design

Use when designing, specifying, architecting, or drafting a design for any system, feature, product, protocol, game, or workflow, and you want adversarial stress-testing before writing code. Trigger phrases include "design this", "design the system", "architect this", "draft a design", "design a feature", "design spec", "stress-test the design", "battle-test the design", "find flaws in this design", "design review", "harden the design", "pressure-test the design", "think through the design". DFS-based flaw-finding with parallel critic agents that stress-test until coverage saturates. Output is a battle-tested design document with an honest coverage report.

Repository SourceNeeds Review

-3npow