mdm-and-federated-data-governance

Apply Master Data Management (MDM) styles (Consolidation, Registry, Centralized, Coexistence), federated governance via data contracts and policy automation, data catalog + metalake architecture, knowledge graphs for metadata, semantic layers, and access control models (ACL, RBAC, ABAC + PEP/PDP/PIP/PAP). Use when scoping MDM, choosing an MDM style, designing a data catalog, building governance automation, defining data contracts, or implementing fine-grained access control on data products. Triggers: "MDM strategy", "consolidation vs registry vs centralized vs coexistence", "data contract", "data catalog", "knowledge graph for metadata", "ABAC for data", "semantic layer for governance", "metalake". Produces a chosen MDM style + governance architecture with policy automation.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from SkillsMP metadata and should be treated as untrusted until upstream source review is completed.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "mdm-and-federated-data-governance" with this command: npx skills add AlexYedi/skillsmp-alexyedi-alexyedi-mdm-and-federated-data-governance

No markdown body

This source entry does not include full markdown content beyond metadata.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Web3

knowledge-graph-applications

Apply knowledge graph patterns for real applications: identity resolution (strong vs weak identifiers, Connected Components, SIMILAR), fraud detection (fraud rings, legitimate households), organizational graphs (org charts, expertise/skills graphs), dependency analysis (chains, multidependencies, redundant, SPOF, root cause), entity-based search, document similarity, and natural-language query/generation. Use when solving fraud detection, organizational analytics, dependency analysis, semantic search, or natural-language interfaces over a knowledge graph. Triggers: "fraud ring detection", "expertise graph", "single point of failure analysis", "root cause analysis with graphs", "entity-based search", "semantic search", "natural language to Cypher". Produces a pattern + query approach.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Web3

knowledge-graph-platform-integration

Integrate knowledge graphs with the data platform: ETL workflows, Kafka Connect (Neo4j Streams), Apache Spark connectors, GraphQL APIs, user-defined procedures (UDFs), Graph Data Science (GDS) algorithms, in-graph ML pipelines, entity resolution workflows (data prep + matching + curation via WCC), metadata knowledge graph hubs, and data fabric with virtualization platforms (Dremio, Denodo). Use when wiring a KG into the broader data platform, designing entity resolution, exposing the KG via GraphQL, building ML on graph features. Triggers: "Neo4j Spark connector", "Kafka Connect for Neo4j", "GraphQL API on Neo4j", "Graph Data Science", "entity resolution with WCC", "metadata knowledge graph", "data fabric for graphs". Produces an integration architecture.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Web3

data-mesh-domain-topologies

Pick and operate the right Data Mesh domain topology — Fully Federated, Governed, Partially Federated, Hub-and-Spoke, Centralized, Source-Aligned, Consumer-Aligned, Coarse-Grained, or Value Chain-Aligned — and apply domain-driven data product principles (Golden Source, Common Driveway, data ownership rules). Use when scoping Data Mesh adoption, choosing a domain topology that fits the org, designing landing zones, defining what a "data product" means at the company, or reconciling Mesh principles with existing centralized infrastructure. Triggers: "Data Mesh adoption", "domain topology", "data product definition", "fully federated vs governed mesh", "hub-and-spoke for data", "domain landing zones", "data ownership at scale". Produces a chosen topology with rationale and a data product blueprint.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Web3

dataops-and-modern-data-platforms

Apply DataOps practice (SLOs, monitoring, deployment discipline for data), Modern Data Stack composition, Live Data Stack patterns, Data Mesh adoption, Semantic Layer design, Reverse ETL (BLT), Analytics Engineering / Analytics- as-Code (dbt-style), and FinOps for data. Use when establishing operations for a data team, choosing a data platform pattern (MDS vs Live vs Mesh), building a semantic layer, or operationalizing analytics. Triggers: "DataOps practice", "Modern Data Stack composition", "Live Data Stack", "Data Mesh rollout", "semantic layer", "Reverse ETL", "analytics engineering", "dbt workflow", "FinOps for data", "data platform SLOs". Produces a defined ops practice + chosen platform composition with rationale.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
mdm-and-federated-data-governance | V50.AI