Writing OpenRewrite YAML Recipes
Overview
Create production-quality OpenRewrite recipes for YAML manipulation using test-first development.
Core principle: Write tests first (RED), implement minimally (GREEN), apply OpenRewrite idioms (REFACTOR).
When to Use
-
User asks to create/modify OpenRewrite recipes for YAML
-
Need to manipulate YAML files (GitHub Actions, K8s manifests, CI configs, generic YAML)
-
Building search or transformation recipes for YAML structures
When NOT to Use This Skill
Do not use this skill for:
-
General YAML editing (use standard Edit tools)
-
Non-OpenRewrite transformation tools
-
Java versions above 8 (skill specializes in Java 8 compatibility)
-
Generic code refactoring outside OpenRewrite ecosystem
Critical Constraints
JAVA 8 COMPATIBILITY ONLY: Use traditional if-else, switch statements, explicit casting. NO switch expressions, pattern matching, var , text blocks, or Java 9+ features.
LICENSE HEADERS: Always check for {repository_root}/gradle/licenseHeader.txt when creating new recipe files. If this file exists, include its contents as the license header at the top of the generated Java recipe file. Remember to substitute ${year} with the current year (2025 or later as appropriate).
The Workflow
Phase 1: RED - Write Failing Tests
Write test cases with before/after YAML examples using OpenRewrite's testing framework.
Phase 2: Architecture Decision
Choose declarative (YAML composition) vs imperative (Java Visitor) approach.
Phase 3: GREEN - Minimal Implementation
Implement just enough to make tests pass.
Phase 4: REFACTOR - Apply OpenRewrite Idioms
Improve recipe using traits, composition, and conventions.
Phase 5: Documentation
Add displayName, description (with markdown), and usage examples.
Phase 1: RED - Write Failing Tests
Test Structure
Use OpenRewrite's testing framework with before/after YAML. For detailed test patterns and examples, see ./references/testing-patterns.md .
Checklist
-
Write happy path test (simplest transformation)
-
Include edge cases (empty files, missing keys, null values)
-
Test no-op scenarios (recipe shouldn't change unrelated YAML)
-
Consider multi-document YAML if relevant
-
Include real-world examples if domain is known
Verification
Run tests to confirm RED state - tests must fail initially.
Key principle: Start with simplest possible before/after. Add complexity incrementally.
Phase 2: Architecture Decision - Declarative vs Imperative
Decision Framework
Start with: Can this be done by composing existing recipes?
-
YES → Use declarative YAML recipe
-
NO → Need imperative Java recipe with Visitor
Declarative Recipe (YAML Composition)
Create YAML file in src/main/resources/META-INF/rewrite/ :
type: specs.openrewrite.org/v1beta/recipe name: com.example.MyComposedRecipe displayName: My composed recipe description: Composes existing recipes recipeList:
- org.openrewrite.yaml.search.FindKey: keyPath: $.some.path
- org.openrewrite.yaml.ChangeValue: keyPath: $.some.path value: newValue
When to use declarative:
-
Simple transformations using existing recipes
-
Searching for patterns
-
Standard modifications (change values, delete keys)
-
Composing multiple existing recipes
Common declarative recipes:
-
org.openrewrite.yaml.search.FindKey , FindValue
-
searching
-
org.openrewrite.yaml.ChangeKey , ChangeValue , DeleteKey
-
modifications
-
org.openrewrite.yaml.MergeYaml , CopyValue
-
additions
Imperative Recipe (Java Visitor)
When to use imperative:
-
Complex logic or conditional transformations
-
Need to traverse YAML LST structure
-
Creating new YAML structures dynamically
-
Custom matching beyond JsonPath capabilities
Key principle: Always try declarative first. Only go imperative when you hit limitations.
Phase 3: GREEN - Minimal Implementation
For Declarative Recipes
-
Create YAML file in src/main/resources/META-INF/rewrite/
-
Compose existing org.openrewrite.yaml.* recipes
-
Run tests to verify GREEN state
For common recipe patterns, see ./references/recipe-patterns.md .
For Imperative Recipes (Java Visitor)
Extend YamlIsoVisitor<ExecutionContext> (when not changing tree structure) or YamlVisitor<ExecutionContext> (when structure may change).
For complete recipe templates and examples, see ./references/recipe-template.java .
Automation: Use ./scripts/init_recipe.py <RecipeName> to generate recipe boilerplate (class, test file, YAML declarative option).
Verification
Run tests to achieve GREEN state - all tests must pass with formatting preserved.
Phase 4: REFACTOR - Apply OpenRewrite Idioms
Checklist for Idiomatic Recipes
- Trait Usage
-
Can this recipe implement an existing trait?
-
Should a new trait be created for reusable matching logic?
-
Separate "what to find" (trait) from "what to do" (recipe)
- Recipe Composition
-
Can parts be extracted into smaller, composable recipes?
-
Are there opportunities for configurability (parameters)?
-
Could this be split into search recipe + modification recipe?
- OpenRewrite Conventions
-
Recipe has clear displayName and description (both support markdown)
-
Parameters use @Option annotations with descriptions
-
Recipe class is Java 8 compatible (run ./scripts/validate_java8.py src/ to check)
-
Properly handles null values and missing elements
-
Preserves formatting and comments where possible
- Performance Considerations
-
Minimize LST traversals (don't visit more than necessary)
-
Use preconditions to skip files that won't match
-
Return original object if no changes made (identity check)
Verification
-
All tests still pass after refactoring
-
Recipe follows OpenRewrite naming conventions
-
Code is cleaner and more maintainable
Phase 5: Documentation
Documentation Requirements
Recipe metadata (supports markdown):
-
displayName : User-friendly name with markdown formatting
-
description : Detailed explanation with code examples, lists, links
-
@Option descriptions: Clear explanations with inline code examples
Example with markdown:
@Override
public String getDisplayName() {
return "Update GitHub Actions to actions/checkout@v4";
}
@Override
public String getDescription() {
return "Updates all uses of actions/checkout@v2 and actions/checkout@v3 to actions/checkout@v4.\n\n" +
"Before:\nyaml\n- uses: actions/checkout@v2\n\n\n" +
"After:\nyaml\n- uses: actions/checkout@v4\n";
}
Usage examples:
-
Add Javadoc with common use cases
-
Show before/after transformations
-
Document parameter effects
Technical Reference
YAML LST Structure
Understanding the YAML LST hierarchy is essential. For detailed structure documentation, see ./references/yaml-lst-reference.md .
Key concepts:
-
Yaml.Documents → Yaml.Document → Yaml.Mapping → Yaml.Mapping.Entry
-
Yaml.Sequence → Yaml.Sequence.Entry
-
Yaml.Scalar (primitive values)
Essential Patterns
For complete recipe templates and patterns, see:
-
./references/recipe-template.java
-
Complete recipe structure with annotations
-
./references/recipe-patterns.md
-
Search, replacement, and modification patterns
-
./references/jsonpath-patterns.md
-
Common JsonPath patterns for GitHub Actions, K8s, and generic YAML
Quick Reference
Key matching:
if ("targetKey".equals(entry.getKey().getValue())) { /* match */ }
Safe value access:
String value = entry.getValue() instanceof Yaml.Scalar ? ((Yaml.Scalar) entry.getValue()).getValue() : null;
JsonPath matching:
JsonPathMatcher matcher = new JsonPathMatcher("$.jobs..steps[].uses"); if (matcher.matches(getCursor())) { /* process */ }
For more JsonPath patterns, search ./references/jsonpath-patterns.md for your use case.
Recipe Development Rules
-
Always call super methods: return super.visitMappingEntry(entry, ctx);
-
Return modified copies - never mutate LST elements directly
-
Use withX() methods for all modifications
-
Handle null cases with conditional expressions
-
Preserve formatting - LST methods maintain it automatically
-
Java 8 only - no modern Java features
OpenRewrite Traits (Advanced)
For complex recipes that benefit from higher-level semantic abstractions, OpenRewrite Traits provide domain-specific logic by wrapping LST elements.
For detailed information about Traits, refer to the companion guide: ./references/openrewrite-traits-guide.md .
Quick Traits Overview:
-
Traits implement Trait<T extends Tree> interface
-
Include a nested Matcher class extending SimpleTraitMatcher<T>
-
Use matcher.asVisitor() to convert to TreeVisitor in recipes
-
Provide semantic methods like getActionRef() instead of raw LST navigation
Example using Traits:
@Override public TreeVisitor<?, ExecutionContext> getVisitor() { return new ActionStep.Matcher().asVisitor((step, ctx) -> { String ref = step.getActionRef(); if (ref != null && ref.contains("@v2")) { return step.withActionRef(ref.replace("@v2", "@v3")).getTree(); } return step.getTree(); }); }
For complete trait implementation patterns, matcher API details, and advanced examples, consult ./references/openrewrite-traits-guide.md .
Final Validation
Production-Ready Checklist
-
All tests pass (GREEN state maintained)
-
Recipe follows OpenRewrite naming conventions (com.yourorg.RecipeName )
-
No hardcoded values that should be parameters
-
Recipe handles edge cases gracefully (no NPEs)
-
Code is Java 8 compatible (verify with ./scripts/validate_java8.py )
-
Formatting/comments preserved in YAML output
-
Documentation is clear and includes examples
-
Recipe could be contributed to OpenRewrite or org recipe library
-
License header included if gradle/licenseHeader.txt exists (use ./scripts/add_license_header.sh )
Success Criteria
Recipe is production-ready when:
-
Tests comprehensively cover happy path and edge cases
-
Implementation follows OpenRewrite idioms (traits, composition)
-
Documentation enables users to understand and use the recipe
-
Code quality meets standards for upstream contribution
Recommended Approach
Follow this workflow when creating OpenRewrite recipes:
-
Phase 1 (RED) - Write failing tests with before/after YAML
-
Phase 2 (DECIDE) - Choose declarative vs imperative approach
-
Phase 3 (GREEN) - Implement minimal working solution
-
Phase 4 (REFACTOR) - Apply OpenRewrite idioms (traits, composition)
-
Phase 5 (DOCUMENT) - Add markdown documentation and examples
-
Validate - Confirm production readiness with checklist
Always provide complete, working recipes with proper annotations, error handling, and clear comments explaining the logic.
Remember
-
Always start with tests (RED)
-
Try declarative before imperative
-
Apply idioms during REFACTOR, not GREEN
-
Document with markdown for clarity
-
Validate production-readiness before completion