Code Quality

Systematic code improvement through review, refactoring, and debugging with verification gates.

Module Selection

Need Module Reference

Receive Feedback Review references/code-review-reception.md

Request Review Review references/requesting-code-review.md

Verify Before Claim Review references/verification-before-completion.md

Reduce Complexity Refactoring references/oop-refactoring-catalog.md

Functional Patterns Refactoring references/functional-refactoring-patterns.md

Find Code Smells Refactoring references/code-smells-reference.md

Test Strategies Refactoring references/testing-strategies.md

Investigate Bugs Debugging references/systematic-debugging.md

Trace Root Cause Debugging references/root-cause-tracing.md

Add Validation Debugging references/defense-in-depth.md

Verify Fix Debugging references/verification.md

Core Principles

YAGNI, KISS, DRY - Always honor these.

Be honest, be brutal, straight to the point, and be concise.

Technical correctness over social comfort. Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Evidence before claims.

Code Review

Receiving Feedback

Pattern: READ → UNDERSTAND → VERIFY → EVALUATE → RESPOND → IMPLEMENT

Rules:

• ❌ No performative agreement ("You're right!", "Great point!")

• ❌ No implementation before verification

• ✅ Restate requirement, ask questions, push back with reasoning

• ✅ YAGNI check: grep for usage before implementing suggestions

Sources:

• Human partner → Implement after understanding

• External reviewer → Verify technically before implementing

Requesting Review

When: After major features, before merge, after complex fixes

Process:

• Get SHAs: BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) , HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

• Dispatch code-reviewer subagent with: WHAT, PLAN, SHAs, DESCRIPTION

• Fix Critical immediately, Important before proceeding, note Minor

Verification Gates

Iron Law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

Gate: IDENTIFY → RUN → READ → VERIFY → THEN claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying.

Refactoring

Mindset

Simplify relentlessly. Preserve behavior religiously. Measure everything.

Every refactoring: small and safe, tested immediately, measurably better.

Protocol

• Assessment - Baseline metrics, identify smells, classify debt

• Safety Net - Verify test coverage, add characterization tests

• Red-Green-Refactor - Write failing test, minimal pass, improve design

• Pattern Application - SOLID, design patterns, functional transforms

• Validation - Measure improvements, verify behavior preserved

Code Smells (5 Categories)

• Bloaters: Long Method, Large Class, Long Parameter List

• OO Abusers: Switch Statements, Temporary Field

• Change Preventers: Divergent Change, Shotgun Surgery

• Dispensables: Duplicate Code, Dead Code, Lazy Class

• Couplers: Feature Envy, Inappropriate Intimacy

Quick Patterns

OOP: Extract Method, Inline, Replace Temp with Query, Guard Clauses Functional: Map/Filter/Reduce, Pure Functions, Composition, Immutability

Debugging

Core Principle

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST

Random fixes waste time and create new bugs.

The Four Techniques

1. Systematic Debugging (references/systematic-debugging.md )

• Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation

• Phase 2: Pattern Analysis

• Phase 3: Hypothesis Testing

• Phase 4: Implementation

2. Root Cause Tracing (references/root-cause-tracing.md ) Trace backward through call stack to find original trigger.

3. Defense-in-Depth (references/defense-in-depth.md ) Validate at every layer: Entry → Business logic → Environment → Debug

4. Verification (references/verification.md ) Run command. Read output. Then claim result.

Quick Reference

Bug → systematic-debugging.md (Phase 1-4) Error deep in stack? → root-cause-tracing.md Found root cause? → defense-in-depth.md About to claim success? → verification.md

Red Flags

Stop if thinking:

• "Quick fix for now, investigate later"

• "Just try changing X and see"

• "It's probably X, let me fix that"

• "Should work now" / "Seems fixed"

References

Code Review

• references/code-review-reception.md

• Response protocols

• references/requesting-code-review.md

• Request process

• references/verification-before-completion.md

• Verification gates

Refactoring

• references/oop-refactoring-catalog.md

• Martin Fowler's patterns

• references/functional-refactoring-patterns.md

• FP transformations

• references/code-smells-reference.md

• 23 smells, 5 categories

• references/testing-strategies.md

• Characterization tests, TDD

Debugging

• references/systematic-debugging.md

• Four-phase framework

• references/root-cause-tracing.md

• Call stack analysis

• references/defense-in-depth.md

• Multi-layer validation

• references/verification.md

• Verification protocols

Bottom Line

• Review: Technical rigor over social performance

• Refactor: Small, safe, tested, measurable

• Debug: Root cause first, fix once

• Always: Evidence before claims

Verify. Question. Then implement. Evidence. Then claim.