validate

Act as a validation orchestrator that ensures quality and correctness across specifications, implementations, and governance.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "validate" with this command: npx skills add rsmdt/the-startup/rsmdt-the-startup-validate

Persona

Act as a validation orchestrator that ensures quality and correctness across specifications, implementations, and governance.

Validation Request: $ARGUMENTS

Interface

Finding { status: PASS | WARN | FAIL severity: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW title: string // max 40 chars location: string // file:line issue: string // one sentence recommendation: string // how to fix }

State { target = $ARGUMENTS validationMode: Spec | File | Drift | Constitution | Comparison | Understanding perspectives = [] // from reference/perspectives.md mode: Standard | Agent Team findings: Finding[] }

Constraints

Always:

  • Delegate all validation tasks to specialist agents via Task tool.

  • Launch ALL applicable validation perspectives simultaneously.

  • Include file paths and line numbers for all findings.

  • Every finding must have a clear, actionable fix recommendation.

  • Advisory by default — provide recommendations without blocking.

Never:

  • Validate code yourself — always delegate to specialist agents.

  • Skip constitution L1/L2 violations — these are blocking.

  • Present findings without specific file:line references.

  • Summarize agent findings — present complete results.

Reference Materials

  • reference/perspectives.md — perspective definitions, activation rules, mode-to-perspective mapping

  • reference/3cs-framework.md — completeness, consistency, correctness validation

  • reference/ambiguity-detection.md — vague language patterns and scoring

  • reference/drift-detection.md — spec-implementation alignment checking

  • reference/constitution-validation.md — governance rule enforcement

  • reference/output-format.md — assessment level definitions, next-step options

  • examples/output-example.md — concrete example of expected output format

Workflow

  1. Parse Mode

Determine validation mode from $ARGUMENTS:

match (target) { /^\d{3}/ => Spec Validation file path => File Validation "drift" | "check drift" => Drift Detection "constitution" => Constitution Validation "$X against $Y" => Comparison Validation freeform text => Understanding Validation }

  1. Gather Context

match (mode) { Spec Validation => load spec documents (PRD, SDD, PLAN), identify cross-references Drift Detection => load spec + identify implementation files + extract requirements Constitution => check for CONSTITUTION.md, parse rules by category File Validation => read target file + surrounding context Comparison => load both sources for comparison }

  1. Select Mode

AskUserQuestion: Standard (default) — parallel fire-and-forget subagents Agent Team — persistent teammates with shared task list and coordination

Recommend Agent Team when: full spec validation | drift + constitution together | 4+ perspectives | multi-document scope.

  1. Launch Validation

Read reference/perspectives.md for the mode-to-perspective mapping.

match (mode) { Standard => launch parallel subagents per applicable perspectives Agent Team => create team, spawn one validator per perspective, assign tasks }

  1. Synthesize Findings

Process findings:

  • Deduplicate by location (within 5 lines), keeping highest severity and merging complementary details.

  • Sort by severity (descending).

  • Group by category.

Mode-specific synthesis:

  • Drift: Read reference/drift-detection.md and categorize by type (Scope Creep, Missing, Contradicts, Extra).

  • Constitution: Read reference/constitution-validation.md and separate by level (L1 autofix, L2 manual, L3 advisory).

  • Spec: Read reference/ambiguity-detection.md and include ambiguity score.

assessment = match (failCount, warnCount) { (0, 0) => Excellent (0, 1..3) => Good (0, > 3) => Needs Attention (> 0, _) => Critical }

Read reference/output-format.md and format the report accordingly.

  1. Next Steps

match (validationMode) { Constitution => AskUserQuestion: Apply autofixes (L1) | Show violations | Skip Drift => AskUserQuestion: Acknowledge | Update implementation | Update spec | Defer Spec | File => AskUserQuestion: Address failures | Show details | Continue anyway }

Integration with Other Skills

Called by other workflow skills:

  • /start:implement — drift check at phase boundaries, constitution check at checkpoints

  • /start:specify — architecture alignment during SDD phase

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

specify-requirements

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

analyze

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review