fresh-eyes

Re-reads code you just wrote with fresh perspective to catch bugs, errors, and issues. Use after completing a feature, fixing a bug, or any code changes. Triggers on "review my code", "fresh eyes", "check for bugs", "did I miss anything", or "sanity check".

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "fresh-eyes" with this command: npx skills add richtabor/agent-skills/richtabor-agent-skills-fresh-eyes

Fresh Eyes Review

Re-read all code you just wrote or modified with a fresh perspective. Look for obvious bugs, errors, problems, and confusion that are easy to miss when deep in implementation.

When to Use

  • After completing a feature or fix
  • Before committing changes
  • When you feel like something might be off
  • After a long coding session

Process

1. Identify Changed Code

Find all files you modified in this session. If unclear, ask the user or check recent git changes:

git diff --name-only HEAD~1
git diff --name-only --cached

2. Re-read with Fresh Eyes

Read each modified file completely. Pretend you've never seen this code before. Look for:

Logic errors

  • Off-by-one errors
  • Inverted conditions
  • Missing null/undefined checks
  • Race conditions
  • Incorrect comparisons (== vs ===, > vs >=)

Obvious bugs

  • Typos in variable names
  • Copy-paste errors
  • Forgotten return statements
  • Unused variables that should be used
  • Wrong function called

Missing pieces

  • Error handling gaps
  • Edge cases not covered
  • Cleanup code missing (close connections, clear timeouts)
  • Validation missing at boundaries

Confusion risks

  • Misleading variable names
  • Complex logic without comments
  • Inconsistent patterns within the file
  • Magic numbers without explanation

3. Fix Issues

For each issue found:

  1. Explain what's wrong in 1 sentence
  2. Fix it immediately
  3. Move to the next issue

Don't ask for permission. Just fix obvious problems.

4. Report Summary

After fixing, provide a brief summary:

## Fresh Eyes Review

Fixed 3 issues:
- `api/users.ts:47` — Missing null check on user.profile
- `api/users.ts:82` — Off-by-one in pagination (used > instead of >=)
- `utils/format.ts:15` — Typo: `formattedDte` → `formattedDate`

No other issues found.

If nothing found:

## Fresh Eyes Review

Reviewed 4 files. No issues found.

What NOT to Do

  • Don't refactor working code
  • Don't add features
  • Don't change style preferences
  • Don't optimize prematurely
  • Don't add comments to obvious code
  • Don't reorganize file structure

Focus only on bugs, errors, and problems. If it works and isn't broken, leave it alone.

Checklist

Run through mentally for each file:

  • All variables initialized before use?
  • All functions return what they should?
  • All loops terminate correctly?
  • All conditions handle both branches?
  • All async operations awaited?
  • All errors caught or propagated?
  • All resources cleaned up?
  • All edge cases handled (empty, null, zero, negative)?

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

ralph-github-create-issues

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

ralph-github-start-loop

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

humanize

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

create-prd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review