Principles
-
Keep it simple (KISS) — prefer the simplest solution that works
-
Don't repeat yourself (DRY) — extract when you see three duplicates, not before
-
Single Responsibility — each module/function does one thing
-
Use descriptive, intention-revealing names
-
Use kebab-case for files and folders
-
Functions should have clear inputs and outputs with minimal side effects
-
Keep functions right-sized — extract when logic needs a comment to explain
-
Delete dead code — don't comment it out
-
Never swallow errors silently
-
Measure before optimizing — no premature performance work
-
No premature abstraction — wait for three concrete duplicates before extracting
Rules
See rules index for detailed patterns.
Examples
Positive Trigger
User: "Review this service and remove duplication while keeping behavior unchanged."
Expected behavior: Use core-coding-standards guidance, follow its workflow, and return actionable output.
Non-Trigger
User: "Generate a one-off product marketing tagline."
Expected behavior: Do not prioritize core-coding-standards ; choose a more relevant skill or proceed without it.
Troubleshooting
Skill Does Not Trigger
-
Error: The skill is not selected when expected.
-
Cause: Request wording does not clearly match the description trigger conditions.
-
Solution: Rephrase with explicit domain/task keywords from the description and retry.
Guidance Conflicts With Another Skill
-
Error: Instructions from multiple skills conflict in one task.
-
Cause: Overlapping scope across loaded skills.
-
Solution: State which skill is authoritative for the current step and apply that workflow first.
Output Is Too Generic
-
Error: Result lacks concrete, actionable detail.
-
Cause: Task input omitted context, constraints, or target format.
-
Solution: Add specific constraints (environment, scope, format, success criteria) and rerun.
Workflow
-
Identify whether the request clearly matches core-coding-standards scope and triggers.
-
Apply the skill rules and referenced guidance to produce a concrete result.
-
Validate output quality against constraints; if gaps remain, refine once with explicit assumptions.