Review Elixir/Phoenix Code

Review code by spawning parallel specialist agents. Find and explain issues — do NOT create tasks or fix anything.

Usage

/phx:review # Review all changed files /phx:review test # Review test files only /phx:review security # Run security audit only /phx:review oban # Review Oban workers only /phx:review deploy # Validate deployment config /phx:review iron-laws # Check Iron Law violations only /phx:review .claude/plans/auth/plan.md # Review implementation of plan

Arguments

$ARGUMENTS = Focus area or path to plan file.

Workflow

Step 1: Identify Changed Files and Prepare Directories

CRITICAL: Create output dirs BEFORE spawning agents — agents

cannot create directories and will fail repeatedly on writes

SLUG="$(basename "$(ls -td .claude/plans/*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)" 2>/dev/null || echo "review")" mkdir -p ".claude/plans/${SLUG}/reviews" ".claude/plans/${SLUG}/summaries"

If no plan context, use fallback directory

mkdir -p .claude/reviews

git diff --name-only HEAD~5 # Recent changes git diff --name-only main # Or changes from main

Step 1b: Load Plan Context (Scratchpad)

If reviewing a plan, read .claude/plans/${SLUG}/scratchpad.md for planning decisions, rationale, and handoff notes. Include relevant decisions in each agent's prompt so they have context about WHY code was written a certain way. This eliminates session archaeology.

Step 1c: Check Prior Reviews

If .claude/plans/${SLUG}/reviews/ has prior output, include consolidated summary in each agent's prompt as "PRIOR FINDINGS" with instruction: "Focus on NEW issues. Mark still-present issues as PERSISTENT."

Step 2: Create Task List and Spawn Review Agents (MANDATORY)

NEVER spawn the same agent role twice in one review. If reviewing a plan, scope ALL agents to the plan's changed files in a single pass. Do NOT run a scoped review followed by a broader review — one pass per role.

Create Claude Code tasks for each review agent BEFORE spawning. This gives real-time progress visibility:

For each agent to spawn: TaskCreate({ subject: "{Agent Name} review", description: "Review changed files for {focus area}", activeForm: "Running {Agent Name}..." }) TaskUpdate({taskId, status: "in_progress"})

Then spawn agents using the Agent tool. Do NOT analyze code yourself — delegate to agents.

For /phx:review or /phx:review all — spawn ALL 5 in ONE message (parallel). Use these EXACT subagent_type values:

Agent subagent_type

Elixir Reviewer elixir-phoenix:elixir-reviewer

Testing Reviewer elixir-phoenix:testing-reviewer

Security Analyzer elixir-phoenix:security-analyzer

Verification Runner elixir-phoenix:verification-runner

Iron Law Judge elixir-phoenix:iron-law-judge

Spawn ALL agents with mode: "bypassPermissions" and run_in_background: true — background agents cannot answer interactive Bash permission prompts.

For focused reviews — spawn the specified agent only:

Argument subagent_type

test

elixir-phoenix:testing-reviewer

security

elixir-phoenix:security-analyzer

oban

elixir-phoenix:oban-specialist

deploy

elixir-phoenix:deployment-validator

iron-laws

elixir-phoenix:iron-law-judge

Zero agents spawned = skill failure.

Step 3: Collect and Compress Findings

Wait for ALL agents to FULLY complete. Do NOT report status until every agent completes. Mark each agent's Claude Code task as completed via TaskUpdate as it finishes.

Verification-runner fallback: If it fails/times out, run directly: mix compile --warnings-as-errors && mix format --check-formatted $(git diff --name-only HEAD~5 | grep '.exs?$' | tr '\n' ' ') && mix credo --strict && mix test

For full reviews (5 agents): Spawn elixir-phoenix:context-supervisor to compress output:

Prompt: "Compress review agent output. input_dir: .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews output_dir: .claude/plans/{slug}/summaries output_file: review-consolidated.md priority_instructions: BLOCKERs and WARNINGs: KEEP ALL. SUGGESTIONs: COMPRESS similar ones into groups. Deconfliction: when iron-law-judge and elixir-reviewer flag same code, keep iron-law-judge finding."

For focused reviews (1 agent): Skip supervisor, read agent output directly.

Step 4: Generate Review Summary

Read the consolidated summary (full review) or agent output (focused review). Write to .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{feature}-review.md

with verdict: PASS | PASS WITH WARNINGS | REQUIRES CHANGES | BLOCKED.

Step 5: Present Findings and Ask User

STOP and present the review. Do NOT create tasks or fix anything.

On BLOCKED or REQUIRES CHANGES: Show finding count by severity, then offer concrete options via AskUserQuestion :

• Triage first — /phx:triage to convert findings to tasks (recommended)

• Replan fixes — /phx:plan .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{file}.md

• Fix directly — fix blockers now in this session

• Handle myself — I'll take it from here

Example: "Review complete — 3 blockers, 5 warnings, 2 suggestions. Recommend triaging first to prioritize."

On PASS / PASS WITH WARNINGS: Suggest /phx:compound , /phx:document , /phx:learn . If warnings reveal scope gaps, also suggest: /phx:plan .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{file}.md

to create a follow-up plan from review findings.

Iron Laws

• Review is READ-ONLY — Find and explain, never fix

• NEVER auto-fix after review — Always ask the user first

• Always offer both paths: /phx:plan and /phx:work

• Research before claiming — Agents MUST research before making claims about CI/CD or external services

Integration with Workflow

/phx:plan → /phx:work ↓ /phx:review ← YOU ARE HERE (findings only, no tasks) ↓ Blocked? → /phx:triage, /phx:plan, or /phx:work Pass → /phx:compound (capture solutions)

References

• references/review-template.md — Full review template format

• references/example-review.md — Example review output

• references/blocker-handling.md — Severity classification