planning-with-files

Planning with Files - Manus-Style File-Based Planning

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "planning-with-files" with this command: npx skills add oimiragieo/agent-studio/oimiragieo-agent-studio-planning-with-files

Planning with Files - Manus-Style File-Based Planning

Work like Manus (the $2B AI agent Meta acquired): Use persistent markdown files as your "working memory on disk."

Core Principle

Context Window = RAM (volatile, limited) Filesystem = Disk (persistent, unlimited)

→ Anything important gets written to disk.

The 3-File Pattern

For every complex task, create THREE files in your project directory:

task_plan.md → Track phases and progress findings.md → Store research and findings progress.md → Session log and test results

Templates are available at: .claude/templates/planning/

When to Use This Pattern

Use for:

  • Multi-step tasks (3+ steps)

  • Research tasks

  • Building/creating projects

  • Tasks spanning many tool calls

  • Anything requiring organization

Skip for:

  • Simple questions

  • Single-file edits

  • Quick lookups

Critical Timing Rules

These rules simulate hooks to ensure proper workflow:

📌 At Task Start (SessionStart)

MUST create all three files FIRST before any other work:

  • Create task_plan.md using the template

  • Create findings.md using the template

  • Create progress.md using the template

  • Fill in the Goal section in task_plan.md

Why: Without planning files, you'll forget goals after 50+ tool calls.

📌 Before Major Decisions (PreToolUse)

MUST re-read task_plan.md before:

  • Writing or editing files

  • Executing commands

  • Making architectural decisions

  • Implementing features

How: Use the Read tool to refresh the plan in your context.

Why: This keeps goals fresh in your attention window (Manus's "attention manipulation").

📌 After File Operations (PostToolUse)

MUST update status immediately after:

  • Writing files

  • Editing files

  • Completing a task phase

How: Edit task_plan.md to update phase status:

  • Status: pending → in_progress → complete

Why: Tracks progress and prevents losing track of what's done.

📌 Before Task End (Stop)

MUST verify completion:

  • Check all phases marked as complete

  • Review deliverables section

  • Ensure no errors left unresolved

Why: Prevents premature completion with missing work.

The 6 Critical Rules

  1. Create Plan First

Never start a complex task without task_plan.md . Non-negotiable.

Goal

[One sentence describing the end state]

Current Phase

Phase 1

Phases

Phase 1: Requirements & Discovery

  • Understand user intent
  • Identify constraints
  • Status: in_progress
  1. The 2-Action Rule

"After every 2 view/browser/search operations, IMMEDIATELY save key findings to findings.md."

This prevents visual/multimodal information from being lost.

Visual/Browser Findings

  • Screenshot shows login form with email and password fields
  • API documentation indicates JSON response format
  1. Read Before Decide

Before major decisions, read the plan file. This keeps goals in your attention window.

Before implementing a feature:

Read tool → task_plan.md

Now proceed with implementation

  1. Update After Act

After completing any phase:

  • Mark phase status: pending → in_progress → complete

  • Log any errors encountered

  • Note files created/modified

Errors Encountered

ErrorAttemptResolution
FileNotFoundError1Created default config
  1. Log ALL Errors

Every error goes in the plan file. This builds knowledge and prevents repetition.

  1. Never Repeat Failures

if action_failed: next_action != same_action

Track what you tried. Mutate the approach.

The 3-Strike Error Protocol

ATTEMPT 1: Diagnose & Fix → Read error carefully → Identify root cause → Apply targeted fix

ATTEMPT 2: Alternative Approach → Same error? Try different method → Different tool? Different library? → NEVER repeat exact same failing action

ATTEMPT 3: Broader Rethink → Question assumptions → Search for solutions → Consider updating the plan

AFTER 3 FAILURES: Escalate to User → Explain what you tried → Share the specific error → Ask for guidance

File Purposes

File Purpose When to Update

task_plan.md

Phases, progress, decisions After each phase

findings.md

Research, discoveries After ANY discovery

progress.md

Session log, test results Throughout session

Read vs Write Decision Matrix

Situation Action Reason

Just wrote a file DON'T read Content still in context

Viewed image/PDF Write findings NOW Multimodal → text before lost

Browser returned data Write to file Screenshots don't persist

Starting new phase Read plan/findings Re-orient if context stale

Error occurred Read relevant file Need current state to fix

Resuming after gap Read all planning files Recover state

The 5-Question Reboot Test

If you can answer these, your context management is solid:

Question Answer Source

Where am I? Current phase in task_plan.md

Where am I going? Remaining phases

What's the goal? Goal statement in plan

What have I learned? findings.md

What have I done? progress.md

Template Structure

task_plan.md Template

Task Plan: [Brief Description]

Goal

[One sentence describing the end state]

Current Phase

Phase 1

Phases

Phase 1: Requirements & Discovery

  • Understand user intent
  • Identify constraints and requirements
  • Document findings in findings.md
  • Status: in_progress

Phase 2: Planning & Structure

  • Define technical approach
  • Create project structure if needed
  • Document decisions with rationale
  • Status: pending

Phase 3: Implementation

  • Execute the plan step by step
  • Write code to files before executing
  • Test incrementally
  • Status: pending

Phase 4: Testing & Verification

  • Verify all requirements met
  • Document test results in progress.md
  • Fix any issues found
  • Status: pending

Phase 5: Delivery

  • Review all output files
  • Ensure deliverables are complete
  • Deliver to user
  • Status: pending

Key Questions

  1. [Question to answer]
  2. [Question to answer]

Decisions Made

DecisionRationale

Errors Encountered

ErrorAttemptResolution
1

findings.md Template

Findings & Decisions

Requirements

Add requirements captured from user request here.

Research Findings

Document key discoveries during exploration here.

Technical Decisions

Record decisions made with rationale.

DecisionRationale

Issues Encountered

Document errors and how they were resolved.

IssueResolution

Resources

Add URLs, file paths, and API references here.

Visual/Browser Findings

CRITICAL: Update after every 2 view/browser operations.

progress.md Template

Progress Log

Session: [DATE]

Phase 1: [Title]

  • Status: in_progress
  • Started: [timestamp]
  • Actions taken:
  • Files created/modified:

Test Results

TestInputExpectedActualStatus

Error Log

TimestampErrorAttemptResolution
1

5-Question Reboot Check

QuestionAnswer
Where am I?Phase X
Where am I going?Remaining phases
What's the goal?[goal statement]
What have I learned?See findings.md
What have I done?See above

Iron Laws

  • ALWAYS create task_plan.md , findings.md , and progress.md before starting any complex task — filesystem memory survives context resets, working memory does not.

  • ALWAYS re-read task_plan.md before making major decisions — context windows are volatile, files persist indefinitely.

  • NEVER retry a failed action with identical inputs — log the failure in the plan file, diagnose the root cause, and mutate the approach.

  • ALWAYS write multimodal findings (screenshots, browser data) to findings.md immediately after capture — visual context cannot be retrieved once it leaves the attention window.

  • NEVER mark a task complete without verifying all phases are complete and all deliverables are present in the progress file.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern Why It Fails Correct Approach

Using session task tools for persistence In-memory task tracking is volatile; lost on context reset Create task_plan.md file on disk — survives resets

Stating goals once and forgetting them Context fills; goals drift without anchoring Re-read plan file before every major decision

Hiding errors and retrying silently Silent retries repeat the same failure endlessly Log every error to plan file with attempt count

Stuffing all research into context Context window fills; earlier content gets lost Store large content and discoveries in findings.md

Starting execution without a plan Undefined scope leads to wasted work and missed steps Create all three planning files FIRST before any action

The Manus Principles

Principle Implementation

Filesystem as memory Store in files, not context

Attention manipulation Re-read plan before decisions

Error persistence Log failures in plan file

Goal tracking Checkboxes show progress

Completion verification Check all phases before stopping

Remember: The more context you gather upfront and write to disk, the better your execution will be. Files are your persistent memory.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

filesystem

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

slack-notifications

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

chrome-browser

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

text-to-sql

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review