sec-corp-governance

Review corporate governance practices and board composition from SEC filings using Octagon MCP. Use when researching board structure, director qualifications, committee composition, governance policies, shareholder rights, and related party transactions from proxy statements.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "sec-corp-governance" with this command: npx skills add octagonai/skills/octagonai-skills-sec-corp-governance

SEC Corporate Governance

Review corporate governance practices and board composition from SEC filings for public companies using the Octagon MCP server.

Prerequisites

Ensure Octagon MCP is configured in your AI agent (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, etc.). See references/mcp-setup.md for installation instructions.

Workflow

1. Identify Analysis Parameters

Determine the following before querying:

  • Ticker: Stock symbol (e.g., AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL)
  • Focus Area (optional): Board, committees, policies, proposals
  • Comparison (optional): Prior year, peers

2. Execute Query via Octagon MCP

Use the octagon-agent tool with a natural language prompt:

Review corporate governance practices and board composition from <TICKER>'s latest proxy statement.

MCP Call Format:

{
  "server": "octagon-mcp",
  "toolName": "octagon-agent",
  "arguments": {
    "prompt": "Review corporate governance practices and board composition from ORCL's latest proxy statement."
  }
}

3. Expected Output

The agent returns structured governance analysis including:

Proxy Statement Information:

  • Filing date and annual meeting details
  • CEO and key contacts

Key Governance Areas:

  • Director election proposals
  • Shareholder voting policies
  • Governance disclosures

Data Sources: octagon-companies-agent, octagon-sec-agent, octagon-web-search-agent

4. Interpret Results

See references/interpreting-results.md for guidance on:

  • Evaluating board quality
  • Assessing governance practices
  • Understanding shareholder rights
  • Identifying governance concerns

Example Queries

Full Governance Review:

Review corporate governance practices and board composition from ORCL's latest proxy statement.

Board Composition:

Analyze board of directors composition, independence, and diversity for AAPL.

Committee Structure:

Extract audit, compensation, and nominating committee details from MSFT's proxy statement.

Director Qualifications:

What qualifications and experience do GOOGL's board nominees bring?

Governance Policies:

Review corporate governance guidelines and policies from JPM's latest proxy.

Shareholder Proposals:

What shareholder proposals are included in AMZN's latest proxy statement?

Board Composition Analysis

Independence Assessment

CategoryBest Practice
Board Independence>75% independent
Lead DirectorIf CEO is Chair
Committee Independence100% for key committees
Audit Financial ExpertAt least one required

Director Demographics

DimensionWhat to Track
Gender DiversityRepresentation percentages
Ethnic DiversityBackground representation
Age DistributionBalanced tenure
GeographicInternational perspective
IndustryRelevant experience

Director Qualifications

QualificationRelevance
Industry ExperienceSector knowledge
CEO/C-Suite ExperienceLeadership perspective
Financial ExpertiseAudit oversight
TechnologyDigital transformation
Risk ManagementEnterprise risk
InternationalGlobal operations

Committee Structure

Audit Committee

RequirementBest Practice
Independence100% independent
Financial ExpertAt least one designated
MeetingsQuarterly minimum
ResponsibilitiesFinancial oversight, internal controls

Compensation Committee

RequirementBest Practice
Independence100% independent
ExpertiseExecutive compensation experience
AdvisorIndependent consultant
ResponsibilitiesExecutive pay, equity plans

Nominating/Governance Committee

RequirementBest Practice
IndependenceMajority independent
ResponsibilitiesDirector selection, governance policies
ProcessTransparent nomination criteria

Other Committees

CommitteePurpose
RiskEnterprise risk oversight
TechnologyDigital/cyber oversight
SustainabilityESG oversight
FinanceCapital allocation

Governance Policies

Key Policies

PolicyDescription
Governance GuidelinesBoard operating principles
Code of EthicsConduct standards
Stock OwnershipDirector/executive requirements
ClawbackCompensation recovery
Anti-Hedging/PledgingStock restrictions

Shareholder Rights

RightShareholder-Friendly
Majority VotingFor director elections
Proxy AccessNomination rights
Special MeetingsLow threshold (10-25%)
Written ConsentAbility to act
No Poison PillOr with sunset

Antitakeover Provisions

ProvisionEffect
Classified BoardDelays takeover
SupermajorityHigh approval threshold
Poison PillDeters acquirers
Dual-Class StockConcentrates control
Blank Check PreferredBoard authority

Leadership Structure

Chair/CEO Separation

StructureAssessment
Separate ChairBest practice
Combined with LeadAcceptable with strong lead
Combined, No LeadConcern

Lead Director

ResponsibilityDescription
Board LeadershipIndependent voice
Executive SessionsLeads non-management meetings
CEO EvaluationPerformance oversight
Shareholder CommunicationAccess point

Related Party Transactions

Key Disclosures

TypeWhat to Review
Family TransactionsDeals with relatives
Director TransactionsBusiness with directors
Major ShareholderControlling shareholder deals
Officer TransactionsExecutive arrangements

Red Flags

  1. Material amounts - Large related party business
  2. Recurring - Ongoing dependency
  3. Below market - Off-market terms
  4. Complexity - Difficult to understand
  5. New relationships - Recently established

Director Elections

Voting Standards

StandardDescription
MajorityMust receive >50%
PluralityMost votes wins
Majority of Quorum>50% of attending

Contested Elections

FactorWhat to Track
Activist ProposalsDissident nominees
Vote ResultsSupport levels
SettlementNegotiated outcome
Proxy FightFull contest

Governance Benchmarking

ISS/Glass Lewis Assessment

FactorWhat Matters
Board QualityIndependence, diversity
CompensationPay for performance
Shareholder RightsVoting, access
AuditFinancial oversight

Peer Comparison

Compare across competitors:

  • Board size and composition
  • Committee structure
  • Governance policies
  • Shareholder rights

Governance Quality Indicators

Strong Governance

IndicatorDescription
Independent Board>80% independent
Diverse BoardMultiple dimensions
Separate ChairOr strong lead director
Shareholder RightsProxy access, majority voting
ResponsiveAddresses concerns

Weak Governance

IndicatorDescription
Low Independence<50% independent
HomogeneousLack of diversity
EntrenchedLong tenure, classified
Limited RightsSupermajority, no access
UnresponsiveIgnores proposals

Analysis Tips

  1. Check independence definitions: Companies may define differently.

  2. Track tenure: Long-serving directors may be less independent.

  3. Review overboarding: Directors on too many boards.

  4. Assess attendance: Low attendance signals disengagement.

  5. Compare to peers: Industry context matters.

  6. Monitor changes: Year-over-year governance evolution.

Use Cases

  • Investment screening: Governance quality filter
  • Proxy voting: Inform voting decisions
  • Activist analysis: Identify targets
  • Risk assessment: Governance-related risks
  • ESG analysis: Governance pillar evaluation

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Research

financial-metrics-analysis

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

earnings-call-analysis

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

earnings-qa-analysis

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

sec-footnotes-analysis

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review