wardley

Wardley Mapping strategic analysis—map value chains against evolution to reveal build vs buy decisions and competitive dynamics. Use for technology strategy or investment decisions.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "wardley" with this command: npx skills add neurofoo/agent-skills/neurofoo-agent-skills-wardley

Wardley Map

Create a strategic map showing components positioned by their evolution stage and visibility in the value chain.

Instructions

Identify the user need, map the value chain of components required to meet it, and position each component on the evolution axis.

Output Format

Context: [What situation we're mapping] User: [Who the user is] User Need: [What they're trying to accomplish]


Value Chain Identification

Working backward from user need:

ComponentDepends OnVisibility
[User Need][what it requires]High (User-facing)
[Component A][what it requires]High/Med/Low
[Component B][what it requires]High/Med/Low
[Infrastructure][base requirements]Low (Hidden)

Evolution Assessment

ComponentEvolution StageEvidence
[Component A]Genesis / Custom / Product / Commodity[Why at this stage]
[Component B]Genesis / Custom / Product / Commodity[Why at this stage]

Evolution Indicators:

  • Genesis: Novel, poorly understood, no standard, high uncertainty
  • Custom: Emerging practices, divergent approaches, experimentation
  • Product: Feature differentiation, rental/purchase models, scalable
  • Commodity: Standardized, utility pricing, essential but undifferentiated

The Map

VISIBLE │
   TO   │  [User Need]
  USER  │       │
        │       ▼
        │  [Component A]
        │       │
        │       ▼
INVISIBLE│  [Component B]
        │
        └──────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬──────►
            GENESIS  CUSTOM PRODUCT COMMODITY
              I        II     III      IV

Movement Analysis

What's evolving rightward?

ComponentCurrent StageEvolving Toward
[component][stage][next stage]

Inertia Points

  • [Component with inertia] — [why we might resist]

Strategic Analysis

Build vs. Buy

ComponentRecommendationRationale
[Genesis/Custom]BuildDifferentiator
[Commodity]BuyCommodity, not differentiating

Competitive Dynamics

Our differentiators (left side of map):

  • [Component we do differently]

Commoditization threats:

  • [Component becoming commodity]

Recommendations

Short-term actions:

  1. [Action based on map insights]

What to stop doing:

  • [Component to outsource/buy instead of build]

Key Insight:

[Main strategic takeaway from the mapping exercise]

Guidelines

  • Always start with user need
  • Everything evolves left to right (genesis → commodity)
  • Build on the left (differentiation), buy on the right (commodity)
  • Watch for inertia—past success creates resistance to change

$ARGUMENTS

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

feynman

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

socratic

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

scamper

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review