kaizen:why

Apply Five Whys root cause analysis to investigate issues by iteratively asking "why" to drill from symptoms to root causes.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "kaizen:why" with this command: npx skills add neolabhq/context-engineering-kit/neolabhq-context-engineering-kit-kaizen-why

Five Whys Analysis

Apply Five Whys root cause analysis to investigate issues by iteratively asking "why" to drill from symptoms to root causes.

Description

Iteratively ask "why" to move from surface symptoms to fundamental causes. Identifies systemic issues rather than quick fixes.

Usage

/why [issue_description]

Variables

  • ISSUE: Problem or symptom to analyze (default: prompt for input)

  • DEPTH: Number of "why" iterations (default: 5, adjust as needed)

Steps

  • State the problem clearly

  • Ask "Why did this happen?" and document the answer

  • For that answer, ask "Why?" again

  • Continue until reaching root cause (usually 5 iterations)

  • Validate by working backwards: root cause → symptom

  • Explore branches if multiple causes emerge

  • Propose solutions addressing root causes, not symptoms

Examples

Example 1: Production Bug

Problem: Users see 500 error on checkout Why 1: Payment service throws exception Why 2: Request timeout after 30 seconds Why 3: Database query takes 45 seconds Why 4: Missing index on transactions table Why 5: Index creation wasn't in migration scripts Root Cause: Migration review process doesn't check query performance

Solution: Add query performance checks to migration PR template

Example 2: CI/CD Pipeline Failures

Problem: E2E tests fail intermittently Why 1: Race condition in async test setup Why 2: Test doesn't wait for database seed completion Why 3: Seed function doesn't return promise Why 4: TypeScript didn't catch missing return type Why 5: strict mode not enabled in test config Root Cause: Inconsistent TypeScript config between src and tests

Solution: Unify TypeScript config, enable strict mode everywhere

Example 3: Multi-Branch Analysis

Problem: Feature deployment takes 2 hours

Branch A (Build): Why 1: Docker build takes 90 minutes Why 2: No layer caching Why 3: Dependencies reinstalled every time Why 4: Cache invalidated by timestamp in Dockerfile Root Cause A: Dockerfile uses current timestamp for versioning

Branch B (Tests): Why 1: Test suite takes 30 minutes Why 2: Integration tests run sequentially Why 3: Test runner config has maxWorkers: 1 Why 4: Previous developer disabled parallelism due to flaky tests Root Cause B: Flaky tests masked by disabling parallelism

Solutions: A) Remove timestamp from Dockerfile, use git SHA B) Fix flaky tests, re-enable parallel test execution

Notes

  • Don't stop at symptoms; keep digging for systemic issues

  • Multiple root causes may exist - explore different branches

  • Document each "why" for future reference

  • Consider both technical and process-related causes

  • The magic isn't in exactly 5 whys - stop when you reach the true root cause

  • Stop when you hit systemic/process issues, not just technical details

  • Multiple root causes are common—explore branches separately

  • If "human error" appears, keep digging: why was error possible?

  • Document every "why" for future reference

  • Root cause usually involves: missing validation, missing docs, unclear process, or missing automation

  • Test solutions: implement → verify symptom resolved → monitor for recurrence

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

ddd:software-architecture

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

customaize-agent:prompt-engineering

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

sdd:plan

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

code-review:review-local-changes

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review