deep-research

This skill conducts comprehensive research on complex topics using a multi-agent architecture, producing detailed reports similar to academic journals or whitepapers.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "deep-research" with this command: npx skills add nateberkopec/dotfiles/nateberkopec-dotfiles-deep-research

Deep Research

This skill conducts comprehensive research on complex topics using a multi-agent architecture, producing detailed reports similar to academic journals or whitepapers.

Purpose

The deep-research skill transforms broad research questions into thorough, well-cited reports using a three-agent system:

  • Lead Agent (You): Conducts interviews, plans research, orchestrates subagents

  • Researcher Agents: Execute web searches and save findings to files

  • Report-Writer Agent: Synthesizes research notes into final report

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when the user requests:

  • In-depth research on a complex topic

  • A comprehensive report or analysis

  • Research that requires multiple sources and synthesis

  • Deep investigation similar to academic or whitepaper standards

  • Detailed analysis with proper citations

Do NOT use this skill for:

  • Simple fact-finding queries

  • Single-source information lookup

  • Code-only research within repositories

  • Quick exploratory searches

Agent Architecture

Lead Agent (You - the Orchestrator)

Role: Interview user, plan research threads, spawn and coordinate subagents

Tools allowed: Task (to spawn subagents), AskUserQuestion, Write (for research plan only)

Responsibilities:

  • Conduct user interview to scope research

  • Perform initial reconnaissance

  • Decompose topic into 10+ research threads

  • Spawn researcher agents in parallel

  • Spawn report-writer agent after research completes

Researcher Agents

Role: Execute focused research on assigned subtopic

Tools allowed: WebSearch, WebFetch, Write

Responsibilities:

  • Search the web for information on assigned topic

  • Fetch and analyze relevant pages

  • Save structured research notes to research_notes/ directory

Output format: Each researcher saves a markdown file to research_notes/[subtopic-slug].md with:

  • Summary of findings

  • Key facts and data points

  • Source URLs with brief descriptions

  • Notable quotes or excerpts

  • Conflicts or gaps identified

Report-Writer Agent

Role: Synthesize all research notes into final report

Tools allowed: Read, Glob, Write

Responsibilities:

  • Read all files from research_notes/ directory

  • Identify themes, patterns, and conflicts across sources

  • Structure and write the final report

  • Create the sources bibliography

Research Process

Phase 1: Interview and Scope Definition

Start by interviewing the user to understand their research needs. Ask questions about:

  • Research objectives: What are they trying to understand or decide?

  • Depth and breadth: How comprehensive should the research be?

  • Target audience: Who will read this report?

  • Key questions: What specific questions need answering?

  • Time constraints: Is this time-sensitive information?

  • Scope boundaries: What should be explicitly included or excluded?

The interview should be thorough but efficient. Use the AskUserQuestion tool to gather this information in 2-3 rounds of questions maximum.

Phase 2: Initial Reconnaissance

After the interview, perform initial reconnaissance to identify the research landscape:

  • Conduct 3-5 broad web searches to map the topic space

  • Identify key subtopics, domains, and areas of focus

  • Note promising sources, authoritative voices, and research gaps

  • Create a research plan outlining 10+ specific research threads

Save the research plan to research_plan.md documenting:

  • The research threads identified

  • Which researcher will handle each thread

  • Expected output from each researcher

Phase 3: Parallel Research (Researcher Agents)

Launch 10+ researcher agents in parallel using the Task tool. Each agent receives a focused research assignment.

Spawning researcher agents:

Task tool with:

  • subagent_type: "general-purpose"
  • prompt: Include these elements:
    1. Clear statement: "You are a RESEARCHER agent"
    2. Specific subtopic assignment
    3. Tool restrictions: "Only use WebSearch, WebFetch, and Write tools"
    4. Output instructions: "Save your findings to research_notes/[subtopic].md"
    5. Format requirements for the research notes file

Example researcher prompt:

You are a RESEARCHER agent investigating: "Technical implementation of quantum error correction"

YOUR TOOLS: Only use WebSearch, WebFetch, and Write.

TASK:

  1. Use WebSearch to find authoritative sources on quantum error correction implementation
  2. Use WebFetch to extract detailed information from promising sources
  3. Save your findings to research_notes/quantum-error-correction.md

OUTPUT FORMAT (save to research_notes/quantum-error-correction.md):

Quantum Error Correction Implementation

Summary

[2-3 paragraph summary of key findings]

Key Findings

  • [Bullet points of important facts, data, techniques]

Sources

  1. [URL] - [Brief description of what this source contributed]
  2. [URL] - [Brief description] ...

Notable Quotes

"[Relevant quote]" - Source

Gaps and Conflicts

  • [Any conflicting information or areas needing more research]

Launch all researcher agents in a single message with multiple Task tool calls for true parallelism.

Phase 4: Report Generation (Report-Writer Agent)

After all researcher agents complete, spawn a single report-writer agent:

Spawning the report-writer agent:

Task tool with:

  • subagent_type: "general-purpose"
  • prompt: Include these elements:
    1. Clear statement: "You are a REPORT-WRITER agent"
    2. Tool restrictions: "Only use Read, Glob, and Write tools"
    3. Instructions to read all files from research_notes/
    4. Report structure requirements
    5. Output file paths for report and sources

Example report-writer prompt:

You are a REPORT-WRITER agent synthesizing research findings into a final report.

YOUR TOOLS: Only use Read, Glob, and Write.

TASK:

  1. Use Glob to list all files in research_notes/
  2. Use Read to load each research notes file
  3. Synthesize findings into a comprehensive report
  4. Write the final report to [topic]-report.md
  5. Write the sources bibliography to [topic]-sources.md

REPORT STRUCTURE:

  • Executive Summary (2-3 paragraphs)
  • [Adaptive middle sections based on topic]
  • Critical Analysis
  • Conclusions
  • References (numbered citations)

SOURCES FILE STRUCTURE:

Research Sources for [Topic]

[1] Source Title

  • URL: [url]
  • Accessed: [date]
  • Type: [Academic paper / Blog post / Documentation / News article]
  • Key Points: [bullet points]
  • Relevance: [why this source matters]

WRITING GUIDELINES:

  • Use numbered citations [1], [2], etc.
  • Cross-reference findings across multiple researcher notes
  • Note any conflicts or gaps in the research
  • Use clear, precise academic language
  • Include tables for comparisons where appropriate

Phase 5: Output and Summary

After the report-writer completes:

Inform the user of the generated files:

  • [topic]-report.md : Main research report

  • [topic]-sources.md : Complete bibliography

  • research_notes/ : Directory of raw research (can be deleted)

Provide a brief verbal summary of key findings

Offer to answer follow-up questions or expand on any section

File Structure

./ ├── research_plan.md # Your research plan (Phase 2) ├── research_notes/ # Researcher agent outputs (Phase 3) │ ├── subtopic-1.md │ ├── subtopic-2.md │ └── ... ├── [topic]-report.md # Final report (Phase 4) └── [topic]-sources.md # Bibliography (Phase 4)

Logging and Observability

Track research progress by documenting in research_plan.md :

  • Research threads assigned: List each subtopic and its researcher

  • Status tracking: Note when each researcher completes

  • Issues encountered: Document any gaps or conflicts found

This provides transparency into the research process and helps with debugging or expanding research later.

Best Practices

Agent Separation

  • Lead agent: ONLY spawns agents and coordinates - no direct research

  • Researchers: ONLY search, fetch, and write notes - no synthesis

  • Report-writer: ONLY reads notes and writes report - no new research

This separation ensures clean handoffs and reproducible results.

Research Quality

  • Prioritize authoritative, recent sources (especially for time-sensitive topics)

  • Cross-reference claims across multiple researcher notes

  • Note conflicting information or perspectives

  • Distinguish between facts, expert opinions, and speculation

  • Be transparent about limitations in available information

Efficiency

  • Launch all researcher agents truly in parallel (single message, multiple Task tool calls)

  • Use model="haiku" for researcher agents to reduce costs

  • Use model="sonnet" for report-writer agent for better synthesis

  • Clear task delineation prevents redundant research

Common Patterns

Comparative Research

When comparing technologies, approaches, or solutions:

  • Assign one researcher per option being compared

  • Assign one researcher for cross-cutting concerns (performance, cost, etc.)

  • Report-writer creates comparison tables

Technical Deep-Dives

When researching technical topics:

  • Assign researchers to: fundamentals, implementation, case studies, limitations

  • Report-writer structures from basics to advanced

Market/Landscape Research

When surveying a domain or market:

  • Assign researchers to: major players, emerging players, trends, analysis firms

  • Report-writer categorizes and evaluates the landscape

Historical/Evolution Research

When investigating how something developed:

  • Assign researchers to different time periods or key events

  • Report-writer creates timeline and connects to present

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Research

deep-research

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

deep-research

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

deep-research

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

nanobanana

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review