vertical-slice-architecture

Enforce Vertical Slice Architecture (VSA) when building applications in any language (Go, .NET/C#, Java, Kotlin, TypeScript, Python, etc.) and any type (web API, mobile backend, CLI, event-driven). Organize code by feature/use-case instead of technical layers. Each feature is a self-contained vertical slice with a single entry point that receives the router/framework handle and its dependencies. Use when the user says "vertical slice architecture", "VSA", "organizar por feature", "feature-based architecture", "slice architecture", or when building a new app or feature and the project already follows VSA conventions. Also use when reviewing or refactoring code to align with VSA principles.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "vertical-slice-architecture" with this command: npx skills add mryll/skills/mryll-skills-vertical-slice-architecture

Vertical Slice Architecture

Quick Reference: The 5 Rules

  1. One feature = one directory containing handler, request/response types, validation, and tests
  2. One entry point per feature — a setup/registration function that receives the router and dependencies. Name varies by convention (Setup, RegisterRoute, Map); the role is the invariant, not the name.
  3. Minimize coupling between slices, maximize coupling within a slice
  4. No premature abstractions — no shared repository/service layers until genuine duplication emerges across multiple slices
  5. Test each feature primarily through its entry point, verifying outcomes (DB state, API calls, response). Platform/adapter tests are also encouraged.

Project Structure

{project}/
  features/              # or internal/features/ (Go), Features/ (.NET)
    {domain}/            # orders/, users/, kvs/
      {operation}/       # create/, list/, delete/
        handler          # Single entry point + orchestration
        request/response # DTOs
        validator        # Input validation (optional)
        test             # Co-located integration test
        internal/        # Feature-private helpers (optional)
  platform/              # or Infrastructure/ — shared cross-cutting concerns
    middleware/           # Auth, error handling, idempotency
    database/            # Connection pooling, circuit breakers
    observability/       # Metrics, tracing, structured logging
    opqueue/             # Operation queues, outbox patterns (if needed)
  main                   # Composition root wires features + infrastructure

Workflow: Adding a New Feature

  1. Create directory: features/{domain}/{operation}/
  2. Define the handler with a single exported setup function
  3. Define request/response types (inline for simple cases)
  4. Add validation logic
  5. Register in the composition root (main)
  6. Write integration test that calls the setup function, sends request, verifies outcomes

Workflow: Adding Cross-Cutting Concerns

Place in platform/ (not inside a feature). Examples:

  • Auth middleware, error handling, request logging
  • Database connection pooling, circuit breakers
  • Idempotency middleware, operation queues, event notifications
  • Observability (metrics, tracing, structured logging)

Workflow: Extracting Shared Logic

Only extract when genuine duplication emerges across multiple slices (use judgment — the "3+ slices" heuristic is guidance, not a hard rule):

  • Duplicate business rule: extract to a domain entity/value object
  • Duplicate data access pattern: extract to a shared repository (only for that specific pattern)
  • Duplicate HTTP helper: extract to platform/httpx/

Key Decisions by Language

Detect the project's language/framework and consult the appropriate reference:

Single Entry Point Contract

Every feature exposes one primary setup/registration function. Internal types stay private. The entry point name is conventional — the invariant is: one public function per feature that wires the slice to the framework.

LanguageConventionSignatureDI mechanism
GoSetup or RegisterRoutefunc Setup(r gin.IRoutes, repo Repository)Explicit params
.NETMap (static)static void Map(IEndpointRouteBuilder app)DI container resolves deps in handler
Java/Kotlin@RestController classController discovered by component scanSpring DI (constructor injection)
TypeScriptsetupfunction setup(router: Router, db: Database): voidExplicit params
Pythonsetupdef setup(router: APIRouter, db: Database) -> NoneExplicit params or Depends()

Exceptions: Versioned APIs may have SetupV1/SetupV2 wrappers sharing internal handler wiring. Frameworks with auto-discovery (Spring, NestJS) use the controller/module class itself as the entry point.

Testing

See references/testing.md for full testing strategy per language, including feature integration tests, platform/adapter tests, mock verification patterns, and test naming conventions.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

codex-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

agentmd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

low-complexity

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

test-namer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review