confidence check

Confidence Check Skill

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "confidence check" with this command: npx skills add microck/ordinary-claude-skills/microck-ordinary-claude-skills-confidence-check

Confidence Check Skill

Purpose

Prevents wrong-direction execution by assessing confidence BEFORE starting implementation.

Requirement: ≥90% confidence to proceed with implementation.

Test Results (2025-10-21):

  • Precision: 1.000 (no false positives)

  • Recall: 1.000 (no false negatives)

  • 8/8 test cases passed

When to Use

Use this skill BEFORE implementing any task to ensure:

  • No duplicate implementations exist

  • Architecture compliance verified

  • Official documentation reviewed

  • Working OSS implementations found

  • Root cause properly identified

Confidence Assessment Criteria

Calculate confidence score (0.0 - 1.0) based on 5 checks:

  1. No Duplicate Implementations? (25%)

Check: Search codebase for existing functionality

Use Grep to search for similar functions

Use Glob to find related modules

✅ Pass if no duplicates found ❌ Fail if similar implementation exists

  1. Architecture Compliance? (25%)

Check: Verify tech stack alignment

  • Read CLAUDE.md , PLANNING.md

  • Confirm existing patterns used

  • Avoid reinventing existing solutions

✅ Pass if uses existing tech stack (e.g., Supabase, UV, pytest) ❌ Fail if introduces new dependencies unnecessarily

  1. Official Documentation Verified? (20%)

Check: Review official docs before implementation

  • Use Context7 MCP for official docs

  • Use WebFetch for documentation URLs

  • Verify API compatibility

✅ Pass if official docs reviewed ❌ Fail if relying on assumptions

  1. Working OSS Implementations Referenced? (15%)

Check: Find proven implementations

  • Use Tavily MCP or WebSearch

  • Search GitHub for examples

  • Verify working code samples

✅ Pass if OSS reference found ❌ Fail if no working examples

  1. Root Cause Identified? (15%)

Check: Understand the actual problem

  • Analyze error messages

  • Check logs and stack traces

  • Identify underlying issue

✅ Pass if root cause clear ❌ Fail if symptoms unclear

Confidence Score Calculation

Total = Check1 (25%) + Check2 (25%) + Check3 (20%) + Check4 (15%) + Check5 (15%)

If Total >= 0.90: ✅ Proceed with implementation If Total >= 0.70: ⚠️ Present alternatives, ask questions If Total < 0.70: ❌ STOP - Request more context

Output Format

📋 Confidence Checks: ✅ No duplicate implementations found ✅ Uses existing tech stack ✅ Official documentation verified ✅ Working OSS implementation found ✅ Root cause identified

📊 Confidence: 1.00 (100%) ✅ High confidence - Proceeding to implementation

Implementation Details

The TypeScript implementation is available in confidence.ts for reference, containing:

  • confidenceCheck(context)

  • Main assessment function

  • Detailed check implementations

  • Context interface definitions

ROI

Token Savings: Spend 100-200 tokens on confidence check to save 5,000-50,000 tokens on wrong-direction work.

Success Rate: 100% precision and recall in production testing.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

alex-hormozi-pitch

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

dnd5e-srd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

shopify-api

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

analyzing-financial-statements

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review