Briefing Document
Synthesize source materials into a structured, executive-ready briefing.
Workflow
Briefing document progress:
- Step 1: Gather sources
- Step 2: Analyze and extract themes
- Step 3: Write briefing document
- Step 4: Validate quality
Step 1: Gather sources
Read files, fetch URLs, or accept pasted text. Ask the user for sources if none are provided. Read every source completely before writing anything.
Step 2: Analyze and extract themes
-
Identify 3-7 major themes or arguments across all sources.
-
Track direct quotes with attribution (author, source title, page/section if available).
-
Note areas of agreement, tension, or contradiction between sources.
-
Distinguish claims from evidence — report what sources say, do not add unsupported conclusions.
-
When sources conflict, prepare to present both positions.
Step 3: Write briefing document
Follow this structure exactly:
[Report Title]: Briefing Document
Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraphs: the critical takeaways a busy reader needs. A reader who reads only this section should understand the core findings.]
[Theme 1 Name]
- [Key point with supporting evidence]
- "[Exact quote]" ([Source Author/Title])
- [Implication or significance]
[Theme 2 Name]
[Continue for each major theme identified in Step 2]
Points of Tension
[Where sources disagree or present competing views. Present both sides without taking a position.]
Conclusions and Implications
[Synthesis of what the evidence collectively suggests. Forward-looking implications where supported by the sources.]
Sources
- [Author]. [Title]. [Date/Publication if available].
Step 4: Validate quality
Before finalizing, verify:
- Every claim traces to a specific source (no fabricated content)
- All major themes from sources are represented
- Direct quotes are exact and attributed
- Executive Summary stands alone as a complete overview
- Analysis is organized by theme, not by source
- Tone is objective throughout — no editorializing
- Markdown renders correctly (headings, lists, blockquotes)
Tone and voice
-
Objective and analytical — present findings, not opinions.
-
Incisive — cut to what matters, do not pad.
-
Use "The sources indicate..." or "According to [Author]..." not "I found..." or "We see..."
-
Prefer active voice. Avoid hedging unless uncertainty is genuine.
-
Match the depth of analysis to the complexity of the sources.
Context adjustments
-
Single source: deeper analysis, more granular themes, extended quotes.
-
Multiple sources: comparative analysis, synthesis across sources, highlight agreements and tensions.
-
Technical sources: preserve technical terminology, include code references where relevant.
-
Non-English sources: translate key quotes, note original language.
Anti-patterns
-
Summarizing each source sequentially instead of synthesizing by theme.
-
Burying the key finding in the middle of the document.
-
Including every detail instead of the most significant findings.
-
Editorializing beyond what sources support.
-
Writing an Executive Summary that requires reading the full document to understand.
Skill handoffs
When Run
After briefing is written, audit prose quality docs-writing
If briefing needs to become a presentation creating-presentations