Jira Orchestration Workflow
Execute 6-phase protocol for coordinating Jira-based development work with multi-agent orchestration.
When to Use
-
Starting work on Jira issues (Bug, Story, Task, Epic)
-
Automating development workflows
-
Tracking progress and linking commits/PRs
-
Coordinating multi-agent work
The 6-Phase Protocol
EXPLORE → PLAN → CODE → TEST → FIX → COMMIT
Each phase must complete validation gates before proceeding.
Phase 1: EXPLORE
-
Fetch issue details, acceptance criteria, linked issues
-
Analyze affected codebase areas and dependencies
-
Agents: requirements-analyzer, dependency-mapper
-
Outputs: Issue analysis, affected files, dependency map, risk assessment
-
Jira: Transition to "In Progress", add analysis comment, log effort
Phase 2: PLAN
-
Design solution, break into subtasks, create task DAG
-
Plan file changes, define success criteria
-
Agents (by type): Bug→triage-agent; Story→requirements-analyzer; Task→task-enricher; Epic→epic-decomposer
-
Outputs: Implementation plan, test plan, rollback strategy
-
Jira: Create sub-tasks, add plan comment, update estimate
Phase 3: CODE
-
Execute DAG tasks in parallel
-
Implement changes, add docs and error handling
-
Agents (by tech): Frontend→requirements-analyzer; Backend→requirements-analyzer; DevOps→infrastructure-orchestrator
-
Outputs: Code changes, configs, migration scripts
-
Jira: Add progress comments, log time spent, flag blockers
Phase 4: TEST
-
Run unit/integration/E2E tests, verify acceptance criteria
-
Agents: test-strategist, qa-ticket-reviewer, test-strategist
-
Outputs: Test results, coverage, performance metrics
-
Jira: Add test results, attach reports
-
Failure: Return to FIX, do NOT complete issue
Phase 5: FIX
-
Debug failures, address code review feedback
-
Re-run tests until passing (max 3 iterations before escalation)
-
Agents: hypothesis-debugger, review-orchestrator, code-quality-enforcer
-
Loop: Return to TEST after fixes
Phase 6: COMMIT
-
Create PR with issue key, link to Jira, request review
-
Format: [ISSUE-KEY] description\n\nResolves: ISSUE-KEY
-
Agents: commit-orchestrator, pr-creator, documentation-hub
-
Jira: Add PR link, transition to "In Review"
Agent Selection
Issue Type Primary Secondary
Bug triage-agent, hypothesis-debugger root-cause-analyzer, test-strategist
Story requirements-analyzer, code-architect requirements-analyzer
Task task-enricher technology-specific
Epic epic-decomposer split into stories first
Spike requirements-analyzer, requirements-analyzer domain experts
By Technology: Frontend→react-specialist; Backend→api-specialist; DevOps→infrastructure-orchestrator; Mobile→mobile-developer
By Priority: Blocker→triage-agent + escalate; Critical→senior agents + extended thinking; High→standard selection; Medium/Low→optimize for efficiency
Blocker Handling
Mark blocker when: Missing requirements, dependencies, technical limits, security concerns, breaking changes.
Immediate: Add "Blocked" label, create detailed comment, link blocking issue, notify stakeholders.
Escalate when: Persists >4 hours, beyond agent authority, security vulnerability, breaking changes, customer impact, legal/compliance questions.
Process: Pause, document context, create Jira comment, tag humans, transition to "Waiting for Support".
Human Involvement
Always required: Security changes, breaking API/DB changes, infrastructure, customer-facing features, compliance.
Optional (post-review): Bug fixes, docs, tests, refactoring.
Progress Tracking
Update Jira at: Phase transitions, blockers, test failures, PR creation, hourly.
Status format:
Progress - Phase: [NAME]
- Completed: [items]
- In Progress: [items] (X%)
- Blocked: [items] ([reason])
- Next: [steps]
- Time Spent: Xh Ym
Metrics: Velocity (story points/sprint), Cycle Time (In Progress→Done), Lead Time (creation→completion), Work Log (time/phase).
Best Practices
-
Never skip phases (critical validations at each)
-
Checkpoint between phases for recovery
-
Run independent tasks in parallel
-
Use 3-5 agents minimum, 13 maximum
-
Frequent Jira updates: comments, work logs, links, labels, components
-
Quality gates: All tests passing, >80% coverage, no vulnerabilities, docs updated, human review
Workflows by Issue Type
Bug: EXPLORE (reproduce)→PLAN (fix design)→CODE→TEST (add regression)→FIX→COMMIT Story: EXPLORE→PLAN (subtasks)→CODE (parallel)→TEST (E2E)→FIX→COMMIT Epic: Decompose into Stories, execute each Story workflow, integrate results
PR/Commit Format
PR Title: [ISSUE-KEY] Brief description
Commit:
[ISSUE-KEY] description
Changes:
- item1
- item2
Resolves: ISSUE-KEY
Branch: [type]/[issue-key]-[description] (e.g., feature/PROJ-123-auth)
Smart commits: [ISSUE-KEY] #comment text | #time 2h 30m | #transition In Review
Quality Gates
-
All tests passing (unit, integration, E2E)
-
Coverage >80%
-
No security vulnerabilities
-
No breaking changes (or documented)
-
Documentation updated
-
PR created and linked
-
Human review requested
-
Acceptance criteria met
Example: Bug Fix
Issue: PROJ-123 "Login timeout after 5 minutes"
Phase Activity Agents
EXPLORE Analyze auth code, identify JWT expiry requirements-analyzer, security-specialist
PLAN Design fix: extend expiry, fix cleanup triage-agent
CODE Update JWT config, implement refresh requirements-analyzer, security-specialist
TEST Unit/integration/manual tests test-strategist, qa-ticket-reviewer
FIX No fixes needed
COMMIT Create PR, link to PROJ-123 commit-orchestrator
Integration
Works with: jira (API), git-workflows (branches/PRs), orchestration-patterns (agent coordination), testing (test execution), debugging (root cause analysis).