building-a-promotion-case

Build a promotion case and produce a Promotion Case Pack (target role + timeline, ladder mapping, evidence log, impact narrative, manager alignment plan, sponsor/visibility map, submission-ready promo doc). Use for promotion packet, getting promoted, leveling up, career ladder, promotion committee. Category: Career.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "building-a-promotion-case" with this command: npx skills add liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus/liqiongyu-lenny-skills-plus-building-a-promotion-case

Building a Promotion Case

Scope

Covers

  • Turning “I want a promotion” into a concrete promotion thesis tied to company priorities
  • Mapping your work to the next-level expectations (career ladder / competency model)
  • Building an evidence-backed impact log (metrics + artifacts + stakeholder proof)
  • Creating a submission-ready promotion doc (one-pager + appendix) that makes the decision easy
  • Aligning with your manager using a partnership loop (a.k.a. “Magic Loop”) and planning the next 4–12 weeks
  • Building a lightweight sponsor/visibility plan (political capital without being sleazy)

When to use

  • “Help me write a promotion packet / promotion doc.”
  • “I need a promotion case that maps to our career ladder.”
  • “I want to get promoted this cycle—what should I do and how do I prove it?”
  • “My manager says ‘keep doing what you’re doing’—I need crisp promotion criteria and a plan.”
  • “I want to level up, but I’m not sure what evidence counts.”

When NOT to use

  • You need compensation negotiation tactics for a new offer (this pack is about internal promotion readiness, not external offers)
  • You are in an HR/performance escalation (PIP, investigation, termination risk) — involve HR/manager process first
  • You don’t want to involve your manager at all (promotion decisions are manager- and org-mediated; this pack assumes partnership)
  • You only need a resume/LinkedIn rewrite (use a resume-focused workflow instead)

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Your role + scope today (team, product area, what you own)
  • Target level/role and timing (desired promo cycle/date)
  • Your company’s leveling rubric / ladder (or a description of expectations if you can’t share the doc)
  • 3–8 work examples from the last 6–12 months (projects, launches, decisions, cross-functional leadership)
  • Evidence signals (metrics, customer outcomes, reliability, revenue/cost, quality, speed, adoption)
  • Stakeholders involved (manager, partners, potential sponsors, promo committee style if known)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
  • If the ladder/process is unclear, proceed with a generic ladder mapping and label assumptions for the user to correct.
  • Don’t request confidential/PII; use anonymized numbers and redacted descriptions.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Promotion Case Pack (Markdown in-chat; or as files if requested) in this order:

  1. Promotion thesis + target role/timeline (what you’re asking for, why now)
  2. Next-level expectations map (ladder/competencies → what “good” looks like)
  3. Evidence log (impact table with metrics + artifacts + stakeholders)
  4. Competency mapping (claims → evidence; gaps → plan)
  5. Impact narrative (1-page story + “company problem solved” framing)
  6. Manager alignment plan (“Magic Loop”) (asks, commitments, check-ins, decision criteria)
  7. Sponsor/visibility map (who needs to believe what; how you’ll socialize)
  8. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md
Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + promotion process snapshot

  • Inputs: user context; references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Confirm the goal (promotion vs broader career planning). Capture timing, process, and decision-makers. Identify constraints (confidentiality, limited metrics, org politics).
  • Outputs: Promotion context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list.
  • Checks: Target level and promo window are explicit; boundaries are respected.

2) Define the promotion thesis (make the decision easy)

  • Inputs: company priorities; your work themes; target level expectations.
  • Actions: Draft a 1–2 sentence thesis: “Promote me to X because I already operate at X by doing Y which solves Z.” Tie to a concrete company problem.
  • Outputs: Promotion thesis + 3–5 proof points (bullets).
  • Checks: Thesis is falsifiable and specific (not “I worked hard”).

3) Map next-level expectations (promotion ≠ career, but they should align)

  • Inputs: ladder/rubric (or proxy); target role definition.
  • Actions: Translate the ladder into a small set of competencies and “next-level signals.” Separate: (a) table stakes, (b) differentiators, (c) visibility/scope expectations.
  • Outputs: Expectations map + initial gap list.
  • Checks: Each competency has observable behaviors; gaps are concrete.

4) Build an evidence log (receipts, not vibes)

  • Inputs: 3–8 work examples; available metrics; artifacts.
  • Actions: Create an evidence table that captures: problem, your role, scope, decisions, outcomes, metrics/proxies, and partners. Identify where you need stakeholder quotes.
  • Outputs: Evidence log + “evidence missing” list.
  • Checks: Each major claim has at least 2 evidence types (metric/proxy + artifact/partner proof).

5) Convert evidence into a promotion doc draft (one-pager + appendix)

  • Inputs: thesis, expectations map, evidence log.
  • Actions: Draft the promo doc using the template. Write in exec-friendly language: impact, scope, leadership, leverage, and why you’re low-risk at the next level.
  • Outputs: Promotion doc draft + appendix (evidence snippets).
  • Checks: The doc is skimmable in 3 minutes; every claim has a pointer to evidence.

6) Manager alignment loop (“Magic Loop”) + criteria agreement

  • Inputs: draft doc; manager context; promo process.
  • Actions: Create a plan to align with your manager: ask what would make them confident, commit to what they ask, and schedule check-ins. Draft your “ask” script and the next 4–12 week plan.
  • Outputs: Manager alignment plan + 1:1 agenda/script.
  • Checks: Manager expectations are explicit; next check-in date is scheduled; you’ve made it easy to sponsor you.

7) Sponsor/visibility plan (politics as logistics)

  • Inputs: stakeholder map; known promo committee dynamics.
  • Actions: Identify 3–8 people whose belief matters. Plan how you will: (a) increase visibility of outcomes, (b) request feedback/endorsements, (c) avoid surprises.
  • Outputs: Sponsor/visibility map + outreach templates.
  • Checks: Every key stakeholder has a specific next action and a low-friction ask.

8) Quality gate + finalize

  • Inputs: full pack draft.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Tighten weak sections. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps. Produce a submission-ready doc and a short “manager email” version.
  • Outputs: Final Promotion Case Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is evidence-based, ladder-aligned, and process-ready; risks and unknowns are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (typical): “I’m a Senior PM and want to get promoted to Staff PM in the next cycle (May). Here’s our ladder excerpt and 5 projects I led. Build a promotion case doc + evidence log + manager alignment plan.”
Expected: Promotion Case Pack with a ladder-mapped narrative and concrete manager check-ins.

Example 2 (limited metrics): “I’m a PM on an internal platform team. My impact is hard to measure. Help me build a promotion case using proxy metrics, stakeholder evidence, and artifacts.”
Expected: Evidence log with proxies (cycle time, reliability, adoption, internal NPS) and explicit proof pointers.

Boundary example: “My manager refuses to discuss promotions and HR is involved in a performance process.”
Response: recommend following HR/manager process first; offer to help later with evidence capture, role expectations, and a future readiness plan.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

giving-presentations

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

writing-north-star-metrics

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

setting-okrs-goals

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

positioning-messaging

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review