ai-code-reviewer

Systematically review AI-generated code to catch common mistakes before they hit production.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "ai-code-reviewer" with this command: npx skills add latestaiagents/agent-skills/latestaiagents-agent-skills-ai-code-reviewer

AI Code Reviewer

Systematically review AI-generated code to catch common mistakes before they hit production.

When to Use

  • After AI generates code you plan to use

  • Before committing AI-assisted changes

  • When AI code "looks right" but you want verification

  • Reviewing PRs with significant AI-generated content

The AI Code Review Checklist

  1. Correctness Issues (Most Common)

AI often generates code that looks correct but has subtle bugs.

Check for:

Hallucinated APIs - Methods/functions that don't exist

// AI might generate: array.findLast(x => x.id === id) // Verify this exists in your target

Wrong library versions - API changes between versions

// React 18 vs 19 differences // Node.js API differences

Off-by-one errors - Loop bounds, array indices

for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++) // Should be <

Incorrect null/undefined handling

user.profile.name // What if profile is undefined?

  1. Security Issues

AI doesn't prioritize security unless explicitly asked.

Check for:

SQL Injection

// BAD: AI might generate db.query(SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId})

// GOOD: Parameterized db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [userId])

XSS Vulnerabilities

// BAD: Direct HTML insertion element.innerHTML = userInput

// GOOD: Escaped or use framework element.textContent = userInput

Exposed Secrets

// AI might hardcode values from context const API_KEY = 'sk-abc123...' // Should be env var

Missing Input Validation

// AI often skips validation function processData(data) { return data.items.map(...) // What if data is null? }

  1. Performance Issues

AI optimizes for "looks correct" not "performs well."

Check for:

N+1 Queries

// BAD: AI loves this pattern users.forEach(async user => { const posts = await getPosts(user.id) // N queries! })

// GOOD: Batch const posts = await getPostsForUsers(userIds)

Unnecessary Re-renders (React)

// BAD: New object every render <Component style={{ margin: 10 }} />

// GOOD: Stable reference const style = useMemo(() => ({ margin: 10 }), [])

Memory Leaks

// BAD: Missing cleanup useEffect(() => { const interval = setInterval(fetch, 1000) // No cleanup! }, [])

// GOOD: Cleanup useEffect(() => { const interval = setInterval(fetch, 1000) return () => clearInterval(interval) }, [])

Blocking Operations

// BAD: Sync file operations const data = fs.readFileSync(path)

// GOOD: Async const data = await fs.promises.readFile(path)

  1. Maintainability Issues

AI generates "works now" code, not "maintainable" code.

Check for:

Magic Numbers/Strings

// BAD if (status === 3) { ... }

// GOOD if (status === OrderStatus.SHIPPED) { ... }

Inconsistent Patterns

// AI might mix patterns const getUser = async () => {} // Arrow function async function getPost() {} // Function declaration

Missing Types (TypeScript)

// BAD: AI uses 'any' when uncertain function process(data: any) { ... }

// GOOD: Proper types function process(data: ProcessInput) { ... }

Dead Code

// AI sometimes includes unused variables/imports import { unused } from './utils' const temp = calculate() // Never used

  1. Integration Issues

AI doesn't know your codebase deeply.

Check for:

  • Duplicate Logic - Does similar code already exist?

  • Wrong Imports - Using the right internal modules?

  • Naming Mismatches - Following your conventions?

  • Missing Error Handling - Using your error patterns?

Review Workflow

Step 1: Quick Scan (30 seconds)

  • Does it compile/run?
  • Any obvious red flags?
  • Right general approach?

Step 2: Security Review (1 minute)

  • User input handling?
  • Database queries?
  • Authentication/authorization?
  • Sensitive data exposure?

Step 3: Logic Review (2-3 minutes)

  • Edge cases handled?
  • Null/undefined checks?
  • Error scenarios?
  • Loop bounds correct?

Step 4: Integration Review (1-2 minutes)

  • Follows project patterns?
  • Uses existing utilities?
  • Correct imports?
  • Consistent naming?

Step 5: Performance Review (1 minute)

  • Obvious inefficiencies?
  • Unnecessary operations?
  • Memory management?
  • Async patterns?

Common AI Mistakes by Language

JavaScript/TypeScript

  • Missing await on async functions

  • Wrong this context in callbacks

  • Type assertions hiding real issues (as any )

  • Mixing CommonJS and ESM imports

Python

  • Mutable default arguments

  • Not closing file handles

  • Missing init.py awareness

  • Wrong exception handling scope

React

  • Missing dependency arrays in hooks

  • Incorrect key props in lists

  • State updates in render

  • Missing cleanup in effects

SQL

  • Missing indexes awareness

  • Cartesian products from bad joins

  • Not using transactions

  • Inefficient subqueries

Quick Validation Commands

TypeScript: Compile check

npx tsc --noEmit

ESLint: Style and common errors

npx eslint src/new-file.ts

Tests: Run affected tests

npm test -- --findRelatedTests src/new-file.ts

Security: Quick scan

npx audit-ci --moderate

When to Regenerate vs Fix

Regenerate if:

  • Fundamental approach is wrong

  • Would require 50%+ rewrite

  • Security issue is systemic

Fix manually if:

  • Small corrections needed

  • Logic is sound, details wrong

  • Integration issues only

Documentation Template

When the review passes:

AI Code Review

Generated by: [Claude/GPT/etc] Reviewed by: [Your name] Date: [Date]

Changes Made After Review

  • Fixed null check on line 45
  • Added input validation
  • Replaced magic number with constant

Verified

  • Security review passed
  • Tests added/passing
  • Follows project conventions

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

stack-trace-decoder

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

code-explanation-generator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

codebase-context-builder

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

graphrag-patterns

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review