Subagents enable delegation of complex tasks to specialized agents that operate autonomously without user interaction, returning their final output to the main conversation.

<quick_start>

• Run /agents command

• Select "Create New Agent"

• Choose project-level (.claude/agents/ ) or user-level (~/.claude/agents/ )

• Define the subagent:

• name: lowercase-with-hyphens

• description: When should this subagent be used?

• tools: Optional comma-separated list (inherits all if omitted)

• model: Optional (sonnet , opus , haiku , or inherit )

• Write the system prompt (the subagent's instructions)

<focus_areas>

• Code quality and maintainability

• Security vulnerabilities

• Performance issues

• Best practices adherence </focus_areas>

<output_format> Provide specific, actionable feedback with file:line references. </output_format>

</example> </quick_start>

<file_structure>

Project-level subagents override user-level when names conflict. </file_structure>

<configuration> <field name="name">

• Lowercase letters and hyphens only
• Must be unique </field>

<field name="description">

• Natural language description of purpose
• Include when Claude should invoke this subagent
• Used for automatic subagent selection </field>

<field name="tools">

• Comma-separated list: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep
• If omitted: inherits all tools from main thread
• Use /agents interface to see all available tools </field>

<field name="model">

• sonnet, opus, haiku, or inherit
• inherit: uses same model as main conversation
• If omitted: defaults to configured subagent model (usually sonnet) </field> </configuration>

<execution_model> <critical_constraint> Subagents are black boxes that cannot interact with users.

Subagents run in isolated contexts and return their final output to the main conversation. They:

• ✅ Can use tools like Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob
• ✅ Can access MCP servers and other non-interactive tools
• ❌ Cannot use AskUserQuestion or any tool requiring user interaction
• ❌ Cannot present options or wait for user input
• ❌ User never sees subagent's intermediate steps

The main conversation sees only the subagent's final report/output. </critical_constraint>

<workflow_design> Designing workflows with subagents:

Use main chat for:

• Gathering requirements from user (AskUserQuestion)
• Presenting options or decisions to user
• Any task requiring user confirmation/input
• Work where user needs visibility into progress

Use subagents for:

• Research tasks (API documentation lookup, code analysis)
• Code generation based on pre-defined requirements
• Analysis and reporting (security review, test coverage)
• Context-heavy operations that don't need user interaction

Example workflow pattern:

Main Chat: Ask user for requirements (AskUserQuestion) ↓ Subagent: Research API and create documentation (no user interaction) ↓ Main Chat: Review research with user, confirm approach ↓ Subagent: Generate code based on confirmed plan ↓ Main Chat: Present results, handle testing/deployment

</workflow_design> </execution_model>

<system_prompt_guidelines> <principle name="be_specific"> Clearly define the subagent's role, capabilities, and constraints. </principle>

<principle name="use_pure_xml_structure"> Structure the system prompt with pure XML tags. Remove ALL markdown headings from the body.

---
name: security-reviewer
description: Reviews code for security vulnerabilities
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash
model: sonnet
---

<role>
You are a senior code reviewer specializing in security.
</role>

<focus_areas>
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- XSS attack vectors
- Authentication/authorization issues
- Sensitive data exposure
</focus_areas>

<workflow>
1. Read the modified files
2. Identify security risks
3. Provide specific remediation steps
4. Rate severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
</workflow>

❌ Bad: "You are a helpful assistant that helps with code"
✅ Good: "You are a React component refactoring specialist. Analyze components for hooks best practices, performance anti-patterns, and accessibility issues."

</system_prompt_guidelines>

<subagent_xml_structure>
Subagent.md files are system prompts consumed only by Claude. Like skills and slash commands, they should use pure XML structure for optimal parsing and token efficiency.

<recommended_tags>
Common tags for subagent structure:

- <role>
 - Who the subagent is and what it does

- <constraints>
 - Hard rules (NEVER/MUST/ALWAYS)

- <focus_areas>
 - What to prioritize

- <workflow>
 - Step-by-step process

- <output_format>
 - How to structure deliverables

- <success_criteria>
 - Completion criteria

- <validation>
 - How to verify work
</recommended_tags>

<intelligence_rules>
Simple subagents (single focused task):

- Use role + constraints + workflow minimum

- Example: code-reviewer, test-runner

Medium subagents (multi-step process):

- Add workflow steps, output_format, success_criteria

- Example: api-researcher, documentation-generator

Complex subagents (research + generation + validation):

- Add all tags as appropriate including validation, examples

- Example: mcp-api-researcher, comprehensive-auditor
</intelligence_rules>

<critical_rule>
Remove ALL markdown headings (##, ###) from subagent body. Use semantic XML tags instead.

Keep markdown formatting WITHIN content (bold, italic, lists, code blocks, links).

For XML structure principles and token efficiency details, see @skills/create-agent-skills/references/use-xml-tags.md - the same principles apply to subagents.
</critical_rule>
</subagent_xml_structure>

> Use the code-reviewer subagent to check my recent changes

> Have the test-writer subagent create tests for the new API endpoints

<manual_editing>
You can also edit subagent files directly:

- Project: .claude/agents/subagent-name.md

- User: ~/.claude/agents/subagent-name.md

</manual_editing>

Subagent usage and configuration: references/subagents.md

- File format and configuration

- Model selection (Opus 4.5 for complex tasks, Sonnet 4.5 + Haiku 4.5 orchestration)

- Tool security and least privilege

- Prompt caching optimization

- Complete examples

Writing effective prompts: references/writing-subagent-prompts.md

- Core principles and XML structure

- Description field optimization for routing

- Extended thinking for complex reasoning

- Security constraints and strong modal verbs

- Success criteria definition

Advanced topics:

Evaluation and testing: references/evaluation-and-testing.md

- Evaluation metrics (task completion, tool correctness, robustness)

- Testing strategies (offline, simulation, online monitoring)

- Evaluation-driven development

- G-Eval for custom criteria

Error handling and recovery: references/error-handling-and-recovery.md

- Common failure modes and causes

- Recovery strategies (graceful degradation, retry, circuit breakers)

- Structured communication and observability

- Anti-patterns to avoid

Context management: references/context-management.md

- Memory architecture (STM, LTM, working memory)

- Context strategies (summarization, sliding window, scratchpads)

- Managing long-running tasks

- Prompt caching interaction

Orchestration patterns: references/orchestration-patterns.md

- Sequential, parallel, hierarchical, coordinator patterns

- Multi-tier orchestration (Opus for complex reasoning, Sonnet + Haiku for standard workflows)

- Multi-agent coordination

- Pattern selection guidance

Debugging and troubleshooting: references/debugging-agents.md

- Logging, tracing, and correlation IDs

- Common failure types (hallucinations, format errors, tool misuse)

- Diagnostic procedures

- Continuous monitoring

<success_criteria>
A well-configured subagent has:

- Valid YAML frontmatter (name matches file, description includes triggers)

- Clear role definition in system prompt

- Appropriate tool restrictions (least privilege)

- XML-structured system prompt with role, approach, and constraints

- Description field optimized for automatic routing

- Successfully tested on representative tasks

- Model selection appropriate for task complexity (Opus for complex reasoning, Sonnet for standard tasks, Haiku for simple/fast tasks)
</success_criteria>