PRD Authoring
This skill provides comprehensive guidance for creating high-quality Product Requirement Documents (PRDs) that include:
-
Complete technical specifications
-
Actionable task lists with priorities
-
Relevant code snippets and examples
-
Clear implementation phases
-
Measurable success criteria
<quality_standards>
What Makes a Good PRD
A good PRD MUST be:
-
Actionable: Each requirement can be implemented directly
-
Complete: Covers functional, non-functional, and technical requirements
-
Specific: Uses precise language, avoiding vague terms like "should" or "might"
-
Measurable: Includes success metrics that can be quantified
-
Implementable: Contains sufficient detail for engineering to build
Required Elements
Every PRD MUST include:
-
Problem Statement - Clear articulation of what problem we're solving and why
-
Goals - Specific, measurable objectives
-
Requirements - Functional and non-functional requirements
-
Architecture - System design, components, data flow
-
Implementation Plan - Phased approach with milestones
-
Task List - Actionable next steps (see template below)
-
Success Metrics - Quantifiable measures of success
-
Code Snippets - Relevant examples (see guidelines below)
</quality_standards>
<prd_template>
PRD Template
[Feature Name] - PRD
Overview
[2-3 sentence summary]
Problem Statement
[What problem are we solving? Why now? What's the impact of not solving it?]
Goals
- [Primary goal 1 - specific and measurable]
- [Primary goal 2 - specific and measurable]
- [Secondary goal 3]
Non-Goals
[What we explicitly will NOT do in this iteration - sets scope boundaries]
Requirements
Functional Requirements
- [FR-1] [User stories/use cases as specific requirements]
- [FR-2] [Acceptance criteria for each requirement]
Non-Functional Requirements
- [NFR-1] Performance: [specific metrics, e.g., "API responds in <200ms at p95"]
- [NFR-2] Security: [e.g., "All data encrypted at rest and in transit"]
- [NFR-3] Scalability: [e.g., "System handles 10k concurrent users"]
- [NFR-4] Reliability: [e.g., "99.9% uptime SLA"]
Technical Requirements
- [TR-1] [Technology stack constraints]
- [TR-2] [Integration requirements]
- [TR-3] [Data retention/compliance requirements]
Proposed Architecture
System Design
[High-level architecture - use text diagrams or mermaid]
[Component A] ←→ [Component B] ←→ [Component C] ↓ ↓ ↓ [Database] [Cache Layer] [External API]
Component Breakdown
- Component A: [Responsibility, technology choice, scaling approach]
- Component B: [Responsibility, technology choice, scaling approach]
- Component C: [Responsibility, technology choice, scaling approach]
Data Flow
- [Step-by-step description of how data moves through the system]
- [Include error handling, retries, fallbacks]
- [Describe async/sync boundaries]
API Design (if applicable)
[Include endpoint specifications, request/response schemas]
Technical Considerations
Technology Choices
| Technology | Justification | Alternatives Considered |
|---|---|---|
| [Tech 1] | [Why this choice] | [Alternative 1, Alternative 2] |
| [Tech 2] | [Why this choice] | [Alternative 1, Alternative 2] |
Trade-offs Analyzed
| Option | Pros | Cons | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Option A] | ... | ... | ✅/❌ |
| [Option B] | ... | ... | ✅/❌ |
Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Risk 1] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [How to address] |
| [Risk 2] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [How to address] |
Implementation Strategy
Phase 1: Foundation
- [Task 1.1]
- [Task 1.2]
- [Task 1.3]
Definition of Done: [Specific criteria for phase completion]
Phase 2: Core Features
- [Task 2.1]
- [Task 2.2]
- [Task 2.3]
Definition of Done: [Specific criteria for phase completion]
Phase 3: Polish & Launch
- [Task 3.1]
- [Task 3.2]
- [Task 3.3]
Definition of Done: [Specific criteria for phase completion]
Task Breakdown
<task_list_template>
High Priority (P0) - Blockers for launch
- [TASK-1]: [Actionable task title]
- Complexity: [Simple/Medium/Complex]
- Dependencies: [Task IDs or components that must exist first]
- Parallelizable: [Yes/No - if Yes, specify which tasks can run simultaneously]
- Testing: [Required/Recommended/None - specify type: unit, integration, e2e]
- Acceptance criteria: [Specific, testable criteria]
Medium Priority (P1) - Important but not blocking
- [TASK-2]: [Actionable task title]
- Complexity: [Simple/Medium/Complex]
- Dependencies: [Task IDs or components that must exist first]
- Parallelizable: [Yes/No - if Yes, specify which tasks can run simultaneously]
- Testing: [Required/Recommended/None - specify type: unit, integration, e2e]
- Acceptance criteria: [Specific, testable criteria]
Low Priority (P2) - Nice to have
- [TASK-3]: [Actionable task title]
- Complexity: [Simple/Medium/Complex]
- Dependencies: [Task IDs or components that must exist first]
- Parallelizable: [Yes/No - if Yes, specify which tasks can run simultaneously]
- Testing: [Required/Recommended/None - specify type: unit, integration, e2e]
- Acceptance criteria: [Specific, testable criteria] </task_list_template>
<parallelization_guidance>
Task Parallelization
Mark tasks as Parallelizable: Yes when:
- Task is independent of other in-progress tasks
- Multiple developers/subagents can work on different aspects simultaneously
- Task can be split into independent sub-tasks
Examples:
✅ Parallelizable
- "Design REST API endpoints" and "Design database schema" - can be done simultaneously with coordination
- "Write frontend user profile component" and "Write frontend settings component" - independent components
- "Set up CI/CD pipeline" and "Set up monitoring infrastructure" - separate infrastructure tasks
❌ Not Parallelizable
- "Implement authentication" - blocks on "Design database schema" (dependency)
- "Write API tests" - requires API endpoints to exist first (dependency)
Format for parallelizable tasks:
- Parallelizable: Yes - Can run concurrently with [TASK-X], [TASK-Y]
</parallelization_guidance>
<complexity_guidance>
Task Complexity Levels
Simple
- Well-defined scope
- No unknown unknowns
- Follows established patterns
- Single system/component
- Example: "Add email validation to registration form"
Medium
- Some research or investigation needed
- Multiple components to integrate
- Requires decision-making
- Some ambiguity to resolve
- Example: "Implement OAuth 2.0 login with Google and GitHub"
Complex
- Significant architectural decisions
- Cross-system dependencies
- High ambiguity or research required
- Performance or security concerns
- Requires prototyping or spikes
- Example: "Design and implement real-time notification system with WebSocket scaling"
</complexity_guidance>
<testing_guidance>
Testing Requirements
Each task MUST specify testing needs:
Required - Critical functionality, MUST have tests before merging
- User authentication/authorization
- Payment processing
- Data persistence operations
- External API integrations
Recommended - Should have tests but not blocking
- UI components
- Business logic validation
- Edge case handling
- Error scenarios
None - Tests not applicable
- Configuration changes
- Documentation updates
- Infrastructure setup
- Design/mockup tasks
Test Types:
- unit
- Individual functions/components in isolation
- integration
- Multiple components working together
- e2e
- Full user flows from start to finish
- performance
- Load testing, benchmarks
- security
- Penetration testing, vulnerability scans
</testing_guidance>
Success Metrics
- [Metric 1]: [Current value] → [Target value]
- [Metric 2]: [Current value] → [Target value]
- [Metric 3]: [Current value] → [Target value]
Open Questions
- [Q1] [Question that needs resolution]
- Options: [Option A, Option B, Option C]
- Decision owner: [Who will decide]
Appendices
Code Snippets
[Include relevant code examples - see guidelines below]
Data Schemas
[Include database schemas, type definitions, etc.]
Mockups
[Links to UI mockups or wireframes]
</prd_template>
<code_snippet_guidelines>
## When to Include Code Snippets
PRDs SHOULD include code snippets when they clarify technical details. Use for:
### 1. API Design
**Include when**: Defining endpoints, request/response formats
```typescript
// POST /api/users
interface CreateUserRequest {
email: string;
password: string; // Hashed with bcrypt
name: string;
}
interface CreateUserResponse {
id: string;
email: string;
createdAt: Date;
}
2. Data Schemas
Include when: Defining database models, type definitions
// User schema
interface User {
id: string; // UUID
email: string; // Unique, indexed
passwordHash: string; // bcrypt
createdAt: Date;
updatedAt: Date;
}
// Indexes
db.users.createIndex({ email: 1 }, { unique: true });
3. Configuration Examples
Include when: Defining feature flags, environment variables
# Environment variables
DATABASE_URL=postgresql://...
JWT_SECRET=your-secret-key
RATE_LIMIT_ENABLED=true
RATE_LIMIT_REQUESTS_PER_MINUTE=100
4. Algorithm Examples
Include when: Explaining complex logic
// Rate limiting algorithm
function rateLimit(userId: string): boolean {
const requests = redis.get(`ratelimit:${userId}`) || 0;
if (requests >= LIMIT) {
return false; // Rate limited
}
redis.incr(`ratelimit:${userId}`);
redis.expire(`ratelimit:${userId}`, 60);
return true; // Allowed
}
5. Integration Examples
Include when: Showing how components interact
// Example: Service A calling Service B
const response = await fetch('http://service-b/api/process', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({ data: payload })
});
What NOT to Include
❌ Full implementation code - PRDs are for requirements, not implementation
❌ Business logic details - Save for actual development
❌ Boilerplate code - Unless it's configuration
✅ DO include: Interfaces, schemas, examples of architecture
✅ DO include: Configuration, API contracts, data models
</code_snippet_guidelines>
<task_list_guidelines>
Creating Actionable Task Lists
Tasks in PRDs MUST be:
Specific
❌ "Implement user authentication"
✅ "Implement OAuth 2.0 login with Google and GitHub providers"
Testable
❌ "Make it fast"
✅ "API response time <200ms at p95 under 1000 RPS"
Atomic
❌ "Build the entire checkout flow"
✅ "Build cart summary endpoint" (one of many tasks)
Testable
Each task MUST specify testing requirements (Required/Recommended/None)
Task Template (AI-Agent Optimized)
- [ ] **[TASK-ID]** [Actionable title]
- **Complexity**: [Simple/Medium/Complex]
- **Dependencies**: [Task IDs or components that must exist first]
- **Parallelizable**: [Yes/No - if Yes, specify which tasks]
- **Testing**: [Required/Recommended/None - specify type: unit, integration, e2e]
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
- [ ] [Criterion 1 - must be testable]
- [ ] [Criterion 2 - must be testable]
</task_list_guidelines>
<anti_patterns>
Common PRD Anti-Patterns
Vague Language
❌ "The system should be scalable"
✅ "System must handle 10,000 concurrent users with <500ms response time"
Missing Acceptance Criteria
❌ "Implement search functionality"
✅ "Implement full-text search with filters, returning results in <100ms, supporting 100+ concurrent searches"
No Success Metrics
❌ "Improve user engagement"
✅ "Increase daily active users from 1,000 to 2,000 within 90 days"
Infinite Scope
❌ "Build the best e-commerce platform"
✅ "Build MVP with product catalog, cart, and checkout (payments via Stripe)"
Missing Technical Details
❌ "Use a database"
✅ "Use PostgreSQL for relational data, Redis for caching, with proper indexing on email and product_id"
No Risk Assessment
❌ [No risk section]
✅ [Include risks table with mitigations]
</anti_patterns>
PRD Authoring Workflow
-
Understand the Problem
- Interview stakeholders if needed
- Identify pain points with current solution
- Quantify the opportunity
-
Draft Requirements
- Start with user stories
- Convert to functional requirements (FR-1, FR-2, etc.)
- Add non-functional requirements (NFR-1, NFR-2, etc.)
-
Design Architecture
- Create system diagram
- Define components and their responsibilities
- Map data flow between components
-
Add Technical Details
- Choose technologies with justification
- Document trade-offs
- Include relevant code snippets
-
Create Task Breakdown
- Break into phases
- Create specific, actionable tasks
- Identify dependencies
-
Define Success
- Set measurable metrics
- Define baseline and target
-
Review and Refine
- Check against quality standards
- Ensure no anti-patterns
- Validate with stakeholders
See references/examples.md
for complete PRD examples.