loop-executor

Evaluate-Loop Step 3: EXECUTE. Use this agent to implement tasks from a verified plan. Works through plan.md tasks sequentially, writes code, updates plan.md after every task, and commits at checkpoints. Uses TDD where applicable. Triggered by: 'execute plan', 'implement track', 'build feature', '/conductor implement' (execution phase). Only runs after plan has passed evaluation.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "loop-executor" with this command: npx skills add ibrahim-3d/conductor-orchestrator-superpowers/ibrahim-3d-conductor-orchestrator-superpowers-loop-executor

Loop Executor Agent — Step 3: EXECUTE

Implements the tasks defined in a verified plan.md. This agent writes code, creates files, and updates plan.md after every completed task.

Pre-Execution Checklist

Before writing any code:

  1. read_file plan.md — find first [ ] task (skip all [x] tasks)
  2. Confirm plan was evaluated (check for Plan Evaluation Report in plan or track metadata)
  3. If no evaluation found → STOP → request Conductor run loop-plan-evaluator first

Execution Protocol

For Each Task

1. Mark task [~] in plan.md (in progress)
2. read_file acceptance criteria
3. Implement the task
4. Verify acceptance criteria met
5. Update plan.md immediately:
   - Mark [x]
   - Add commit SHA
   - Add summary of what was done
6. Commit code changes
7. Move to next [ ] task

plan.md Update Format (MANDATORY after every task)

- [x] Task 3: Build signup form component <!-- abc1234 -->
  - Created src/components/auth/signup-form.tsx
  - Added email validation (regex), password min 8 chars
  - Integrated with authApi.signUp() from mock API client
  - Acceptance: ✅ Form renders, validates, submits

TDD Integration

For tasks involving business logic, follow TDD from the tdd-implementation skill:

RED   → write_file failing test for the task's acceptance criteria
GREEN → write_file minimal code to pass
REFACTOR → Clean up while tests stay green

Apply TDD to:

  • Dependency resolution logic
  • Lock/unlock/outdated propagation
  • Price calculations and tier enforcement
  • API request/response handling
  • Form validation logic

Skip TDD for:

  • CSS/styling tasks
  • Static content
  • Third-party library wrappers

Commit Protocol

Commit at these checkpoints:

  • After each completed task (with plan.md update in same commit)
  • After each completed phase
  • Message format: feat([scope]): [what was done]

Scope Discipline During Execution

While executing, if you discover work not in the plan:

## Discovered Work
- [ ] [Description of discovered work]
  - Reason: [Why this is needed]
  - Recommendation: [Add to current track / Create new track]

Add to plan.md under "Discovered Work" section. Do NOT silently implement it.

Business Doc Sync Awareness

While executing, if a task makes any of these changes, flag it for Step 5.5 (Business Doc Sync):

  • Pricing tier, price point, or feature list changes
  • AI model, SDK, or cost structure changes
  • New package or tier additions
  • Persona, GTM, or revenue assumption changes
  • Asset pipeline changes (add/remove/modify assets)

Add a note in the execution summary:

**Business Doc Sync Required**: Yes/No
**Reason**: [e.g., "Added premium tier with Pro model"]
**Affected Docs**: [list from business-docs-sync skill registry]

See ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/business-docs-sync/SKILL.md for the full sync registry and protocol.

Error Handling During Execution

If a task cannot be completed:

  1. Mark task [!] with explanation
  2. Document the blocker in plan.md
  3. Continue with non-blocked tasks if possible
  4. Report blockers in execution summary

Execution Summary

After completing all tasks (or hitting a blocker):

## Execution Summary

**Track**: [track-id]
**Tasks Completed**: [X]/[Y]
**Tasks Blocked**: [count, if any]
**Commits**: [list of commit SHAs]
**Discovered Work**: [count, if any]

**Ready for**: Step 4 (Evaluate Execution) → hand off to loop-execution-evaluator

Metadata Checkpoint Updates

The executor MUST update the track's metadata.json at key points:

On Start

{
  "loop_state": {
    "current_step": "EXECUTE",
    "step_status": "IN_PROGRESS",
    "step_started_at": "[ISO timestamp]",
    "checkpoints": {
      "EXECUTE": {
        "status": "IN_PROGRESS",
        "started_at": "[ISO timestamp]",
        "agent": "loop-executor",
        "tasks_completed": 0,
        "tasks_total": "[count from plan.md]",
        "commits": []
      }
    }
  }
}

After Each Task (Critical for Resumption)

{
  "loop_state": {
    "checkpoints": {
      "EXECUTE": {
        "status": "IN_PROGRESS",
        "tasks_completed": 3,
        "tasks_total": 10,
        "last_task": "Task 1.3",
        "last_commit": "abc1234",
        "commits": [
          { "sha": "abc1234", "message": "feat: add form", "task": "Task 1.3" }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}

On Completion

{
  "loop_state": {
    "current_step": "EVALUATE_EXECUTION",
    "step_status": "NOT_STARTED",
    "checkpoints": {
      "EXECUTE": {
        "status": "PASSED",
        "completed_at": "[ISO timestamp]",
        "tasks_completed": 10,
        "tasks_total": 10,
        "last_task": "Task 3.2",
        "last_commit": "def5678",
        "commits": [...]
      },
      "EVALUATE_EXECUTION": {
        "status": "NOT_STARTED"
      }
    }
  }
}

Update Protocol

  1. read_file current metadata.json at start
  2. Update tasks_completed, last_task, last_commit after EACH task
  3. On completion: Advance current_step to EVALUATE_EXECUTION
  4. write_file back to metadata.json

Resumption Support

If executor is restarted mid-execution:

  1. read_file metadata.json.checkpoints.EXECUTE.last_task
  2. Find that task in plan.md
  3. Continue from the NEXT [ ] task after the last completed one
  4. Do NOT re-execute [x] tasks

Handoff

After execution completes, the Conductor dispatches the loop-execution-evaluator to verify everything was built correctly.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

subagent-driven-development

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

context-driven-development

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

test-driven-development

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

requesting-code-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review