commit

Write conventional commit messages with type, scope, and subject when the user wants to commit changes or save work.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "commit" with this command: npx skills add iannuttall/ralph/iannuttall-ralph-commit

Git Commit

Creates git commits following Conventional Commits format with proper type, scope, and subject.

Quick Start

# 1. Stage changes
git add <files>  # or: git add -A

# 2. Create commit (branch commit format)
git commit -m "type(scope): subject

Body explaining HOW and WHY.
Reference: Task X.Y, Req N"

Commit Types

Regular Branch Commits (During Development)

Format: type(scope): subject

TypePurpose
featNew feature or functionality
fixBug fix or issue resolution
refactorCode refactoring without behavior change
perfPerformance improvements
testTest additions or modifications
ciCI/CD configuration changes
docsDocumentation updates
choreMaintenance, dependencies, tooling
styleCode formatting, linting (non-functional)
securitySecurity vulnerability fixes or hardening

Scope (Required, kebab-case)

Examples: validation, auth, cookie-service, template, config, tests, api

Subject Line Rules

  • Max 50 characters after colon
  • Present tense imperative: add, implement, fix, improve, enhance, refactor, remove, prevent
  • NO period at the end
  • Specific and descriptive - state WHAT, not WHY

Core Workflow

1. Review Changes

git status
git diff --staged  # if already staged
git diff           # if not staged

2. Stage Files

git add <specific-files>  # preferred
# or
git add -A  # all changes

NEVER commit:

  • .env, credentials.json, secrets
  • node_modules/, __pycache__/, .venv/
  • Large binary files without explicit approval

3. Create Commit

Simple change:

git commit -m "fix(auth): use hmac.compare_digest for secure comparison"

Complex change (with body):

git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
feat(validation): add URLValidator with domain whitelist

Implement URLValidator class supporting:
- Domain whitelist enforcement (youtube.com, youtu.be)
- Dangerous scheme blocking (javascript, data, file)
- URL parsing with embedded credentials handling

Addresses Requirement 31: Input validation
Part of Task 5.1: Input Validation Utilities
EOF
)"

4. Verify Commit

git log -1 --format="%h %s"
git show --stat HEAD

Body Format (Recommended for Complex Changes)

<blank line>
Explain HOW and WHY the change was made.
- Use bullet points for multiple items
- Wrap at 72 characters

Reference: Task X.Y
Addresses: Req N

Git Trailers

TrailerPurpose
Fixes #NLinks and closes issue on merge
Closes #NSame as Fixes
Co-authored-by: Name <email>Credit co-contributors

Place trailers at end of body after blank line. See references/commit_examples.md for examples.

Breaking Changes

For incompatible API/behavior changes, use ! after scope OR BREAKING CHANGE: footer:

feat(api)!: change response format to JSON:API

BREAKING CHANGE: Response envelope changed from `{ data }` to `{ data: { type, id, attributes } }`.

Triggers major version bump in semantic-release.

Merge Commits (PR Closure)

For PRs, use extended description with sections:

gh pr create --title "feat(security): implement input validation (Task 5)" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- Input validation utilities (URLValidator, FormatValidator)
- Secure template processor with path traversal prevention
- API key authentication middleware

## Task Breakdown
Task 5.1: Input Validation - URLValidator, FormatValidator
Task 5.2: Template Processing - Path traversal prevention
Task 5.3: API Key Auth - Multi-key support, excluded paths
Task 5.4: Security Tests - 102 path traversal tests

## Requirements Covered
Req 7, Req 9, Req 31, Req 33

## Test Coverage
- All 473 tests passing
- Coverage: 93%
- Pre-commit checks: passing
EOF
)"

Integration with Other Skills

From github-pr-review

When fixing review comments, use this format:

git commit -m "fix(scope): address review comment #ID

Brief explanation of what was wrong and how it's fixed.
Addresses review comment #123456789."

From github-pr-creation

Before creating PR, ensure all commits follow this format. The PR skill will:

  1. Analyze commits for proper format
  2. Extract types for PR labels
  3. Build PR description from commit bodies

Important Rules

  • ALWAYS include scope in parentheses
  • ALWAYS use present tense imperative verb
  • NEVER end subject with period
  • NEVER commit secrets or credentials
  • NEVER use generic messages ("update code", "fix bug", "changes")
  • NEVER exceed 50 chars in subject line
  • Group related changes -> single focused commit

Examples

Good:

feat(validation): add URLValidator with domain whitelist
fix(auth): use hmac.compare_digest for secure key comparison
refactor(template): consolidate filename sanitization logic
test(security): add 102 path traversal prevention tests

Bad:

update validation code           # no type, no scope, vague
feat: add stuff                  # missing scope, too vague
fix(auth): fix bug               # circular, not specific
chore: make changes              # missing scope, vague
feat(security): improve things.  # has period, vague

References

  • references/commit_examples.md - Extended examples by type

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

prd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

dev-browser

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

ralph

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review