sc-improve

Apply systematic improvements to code quality, performance, maintainability, and best practices.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "sc-improve" with this command: npx skills add htlin222/dotfiles/htlin222-dotfiles-sc-improve

Code Improvement

Apply systematic improvements to code quality, performance, maintainability, and best practices.

When to use

  • Refactoring existing code for better quality

  • Optimizing performance bottlenecks

  • Cleaning up technical debt

  • Applying consistent coding style

  • Improving code maintainability

Instructions

Usage

/sc:improve [target] [--type quality|performance|maintainability|style] [--safe]

Arguments

  • target

  • Files, directories, or project to improve

  • --type

  • Improvement type (quality, performance, maintainability, style)

  • --safe

  • Apply only safe, low-risk improvements

  • --preview

  • Show improvements without applying them

Execution

  • Analyze code for improvement opportunities

  • Identify specific improvement patterns and techniques

  • Create improvement plan with risk assessment

  • Apply improvements with appropriate validation

  • Verify improvements and report changes

Claude Code Integration

  • Uses Read for comprehensive code analysis

  • Leverages MultiEdit for batch improvements

  • Applies TodoWrite for improvement tracking

  • Maintains safety and validation mechanisms

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

devops

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

python

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

code-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review