harsh

This command will complete a comprehensive and brutally honest critical review of your manuscript. The review identifies major methodological flaws and areas where the work falls short of publication standards for a high-impact clinical journal.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "harsh" with this command: npx skills add htlin222/dotfiles/htlin222-dotfiles-harsh

Harsh

This command will complete a comprehensive and brutally honest critical review of your manuscript. The review identifies major methodological flaws and areas where the work falls short of publication standards for a high-impact clinical journal.

When to use

  • When preparing a manuscript for submission to a high-impact clinical journal

  • When you need honest feedback about methodological weaknesses

  • When you want to identify publication-blocking issues before submission

  • When seeking to improve the scientific rigor of your work

Instructions

  • Read the README.md and CLAUDE.md to understand the project purpose, setup instructions, and key information

  • Provide a concise overview of the project based on the gathered context

  • Focus on ./result and ./manuscripts

  • Save the harsh critical comment in the ./docs/

  • Give a plan to fix the problem that will contributing meaningful biological insights

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

devops

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

python

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

code-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review