Static Site Security Skill

Purpose

Comprehensive security practices for static websites, leveraging their inherent security advantages while addressing remaining risks.

Security Advantages of Static Sites

Eliminated Attack Vectors

✅ No SQL Injection: No database to inject into ✅ No Server-Side XSS: No server-side rendering ✅ No CSRF: No state management or forms processing ✅ No Session Hijacking: No sessions to hijack ✅ No Remote Code Execution: No server-side code ✅ No File Upload Vulnerabilities: No upload functionality ✅ No Authentication Bypass: No authentication system

Reduced Attack Surface

Traditional Web App Attack Surface:

• Web server vulnerabilities
• Application code vulnerabilities
• Database vulnerabilities
• Server OS vulnerabilities
• Third-party libraries
• Session management
• File system access
• Network services

Static Site Attack Surface:

• CDN security (GitHub Pages)
• DNS hijacking
• Content integrity
• Dependency vulnerabilities (minimal)

Transport Layer Security

HTTPS Configuration

✅ Required:

• HTTPS-only (TLS 1.3)
• Automatic HTTPS redirect
• Valid SSL/TLS certificate
• Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS)

For GitHub Pages:

• Enforced HTTPS in repository settings
• Automatic Let's Encrypt certificates
• TLS 1.3 support by default

Security Headers

Essential headers for static sites:

Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none';

Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

X-Frame-Options: DENY

Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()

Content Security

Subresource Integrity (SRI)

<!-- ✅ Good: SRI for stable, versioned external resources --> <script src="https://cdn.example.com/script.v1.2.3.js" integrity="sha384-..." crossorigin="anonymous"

</script>

<!-- ⚠️ Google Fonts: dynamic content, SRI not reliable unless you self-host --> <!-- Either self-host the font CSS with SRI, or omit SRI for the dynamic URL: --> <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter" crossorigin="anonymous"

<!-- ❌ Bad: No integrity check on a static, versioned asset --> <script src="https://cdn.example.com/script.v1.2.3.js">&#x3C;/script>

Dependency Management

✅ Best practices:

1. Minimize external dependencies
2. Use trusted CDNs only (Google Fonts, etc.)
3. Implement SRI for CDN resources
4. Regular dependency scanning
5. Prefer self-hosted over CDN when possible
6. Document all external dependencies

HTML Injection Prevention

<!-- Even static sites can have issues if using templates -->

<!-- ❌ Bad: Unsafe data in HTML --> <div>{{ userData }}</div>

<!-- ✅ Good: Escaped/sanitized --> <div>{{ userData | escape }}</div>

<!-- ✅ Best: Static content only --> <div>Hardcoded safe content</div>

Access Control Security

GitHub Repository Security

✅ Required access controls:

• MFA enabled for all contributors
• SSH keys with passphrase
• GPG commit signing required
• Branch protection on main/master
• Required pull request reviews
• Status checks must pass
• Restrict who can push
• Restrict force pushes

GitHub Pages Security

✅ Configuration:

• Enforce HTTPS enabled
• Source branch restricted (main only)
• Custom domain with DNSSEC (optional)
• Repository visibility: Public (for open source)

Secrets Management

✅ Never commit:

• API keys
• Passwords
• Private keys
• OAuth tokens
• Any credentials

✅ Use instead:

• GitHub Secrets for CI/CD
• Environment variables
• Secure credential stores
• GitHub Apps (not PATs when possible)

CDN and Hosting Security

GitHub Pages Security Model

✅ GitHub provides:

• Global CDN with DDoS protection
• Automatic TLS certificates
• High availability (99.9% SLA)
• Infrastructure security
• Regular security updates

⚠️ User responsibilities:

• Content security
• Access control
• Dependency management
• Security monitoring

DNS Security

✅ Best practices:

• Use DNSSEC if supported
• CAA records for certificate authority
• Monitor DNS for hijacking
• Use reputable DNS provider

Example CAA record: example.com. CAA 0 issue "letsencrypt.org"

Monitoring and Detection

Security Monitoring

✅ Implement monitoring for:

• GitHub security alerts
• Dependabot vulnerability alerts
• Secret scanning alerts
• Code scanning (CodeQL) alerts
• Unusual access patterns
• Repository changes
• Workflow failures

Audit Logging

✅ Enable and review:

• GitHub audit log (organization)
• GitHub Actions logs
• Commit history (immutable)
• Access logs (GitHub provides)
• Security event logs

Alerting Strategy

Critical alerts (immediate response):

• Secret exposure detected
• Unauthorized access attempt
• Critical vulnerability found
• Security workflow failure

Warning alerts (24h response):

• Dependency with high severity CVE
• Failed security checks
• Unusual activity patterns

Info alerts (weekly review):

• New dependencies added
• Configuration changes
• Access changes

Incident Response

Detection

1. Automated alerts (Dependabot, CodeQL, secret scanning)
2. Manual monitoring (code reviews, security audits)
3. External reports (responsible disclosure)
4. GitHub security advisories

Containment

Immediate actions:

1. Disable GitHub Pages if compromised
2. Revoke exposed credentials
3. Block malicious IP addresses (if applicable)
4. Revert to last known good state

Recovery

Steps:

1. Identify root cause
2. Fix vulnerability
3. Test fix thoroughly
4. Deploy patched version
5. Verify security restored
6. Monitor for recurrence

Post-Incident

Actions:

1. Document incident timeline
2. Update THREAT_MODEL.md
3. Update SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md
4. Improve detection capabilities
5. Share lessons learned
6. Update incident response procedures

Deployment Security

CI/CD Security

Security-hardened deployment workflow

name: Deploy

on: push: branches: [main]

permissions: contents: read # Least privilege

jobs: deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
  - uses: step-security/harden-runner@SHA
    with:
      egress-policy: audit
      
  - uses: actions/checkout@SHA
  
  - name: Security Scan
    run: |
      # HTML validation
      htmlhint *.html
      
      # Link check
      linkinator . --recurse
      
      # Dependency check
      npm audit
      
  - name: Deploy
    if: success()
    run: echo "Deploy to GitHub Pages"

Rollback Procedures

✅ Ensure capability to:

1. Revert to previous commit (git revert)
2. Redeploy last known good version
3. Disable site temporarily if needed
4. Restore from backup if necessary

RTO (Recovery Time Objective): < 15 minutes RPO (Recovery Point Objective): Last commit

Security Testing

Pre-Deployment Tests

Automated tests:

• HTML validation (HTMLHint)
• Link checking (linkinator)
• Dependency scanning (Dependabot)
• Secret scanning (GitHub)
• Code scanning (CodeQL)

Manual tests:

• Security header verification
• HTTPS enforcement check
• Content review
• Access control verification

Security Audit Checklist

Monthly audit:

• Review GitHub security alerts
• Check for exposed secrets
• Verify HTTPS enforcement
• Test security headers
• Review access controls
• Update dependencies
• Review commit history
• Test rollback procedures

Quarterly audit:

• Full threat model review
• Penetration testing (if applicable)
• Security architecture review
• Incident response drill
• Third-party security assessment

Remember

• Leverage Static Advantages: No server-side code = no server-side vulnerabilities

• Transport Security: Always HTTPS with strong headers

• Minimize Dependencies: Each dependency is potential risk

• Monitor Continuously: Automated scanning catches issues early

• Access Control: Protect the source, protect the site

• Plan for Incidents: Detection, response, recovery procedures

• Document Everything: Security decisions and configurations

References

• OWASP Static Site Security

• GitHub Pages Documentation

• Mozilla Web Security Guidelines

• Content Security Policy