STP Framework
Apply the classic Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning framework to identify your most valuable market segments and craft differentiated positioning.
When to Use This Skill
-
New product launches
-
Market entry strategy
-
Repositioning initiatives
-
Competitive strategy
-
Marketing planning
Methodology Foundation
Based on Kotler's STP Model and Michael Porter's competitive strategy, providing:
-
Market segmentation techniques
-
Segment attractiveness criteria
-
Targeting strategy options
-
Positioning development
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
Claude Does You Decide
Structures segmentation analysis Segmentation variables
Evaluates segment attractiveness Target selection
Develops positioning options Final positioning
Creates positioning statements Resource allocation
Maps competitive positions Go-to-market approach
Instructions
Step 1: Segmentation
Segmentation Variables:
Type B2C Variables B2B Variables
Demographic Age, income, education Company size, industry, revenue
Geographic Region, urban/rural, climate HQ location, market presence
Psychographic Values, lifestyle, personality Culture, decision style
Behavioral Usage rate, loyalty, benefits sought Buying process, use case
Effective Segment Criteria:
Criterion Question
Measurable Can we size and quantify it?
Accessible Can we reach and serve it?
Substantial Is it large enough to be profitable?
Differentiable Does it respond differently to marketing?
Actionable Can we develop effective programs?
Step 2: Targeting
Targeting Strategies:
Strategy Description When to Use
Mass Target entire market Commodity products
Differentiated Target multiple segments differently Resources for variety
Concentrated Focus on one segment Limited resources
Micromarketing Individual customization High-value customers
Segment Evaluation Matrix:
Factor Weight How to Assess
Size 20% TAM/SAM/SOM
Growth 20% CAGR, trends
Profitability 20% Margins, price sensitivity
Competition 15% Intensity, barriers
Fit 15% Capabilities, mission
Accessibility 10% Channel, reach
Step 3: Positioning
Positioning Statement Template:
For [target segment] Who [need/problem] [Product/Brand] is the [category] That [key benefit] Unlike [competitors] We [key differentiator]
Positioning Dimensions:
-
Attributes (features, specs)
-
Benefits (functional, emotional)
-
Values (what brand stands for)
-
Use occasions (when to use)
-
Users (who uses it)
-
Against competitors (explicit comparison)
Examples
Example 1: Complete STP Analysis
Input:
Develop STP strategy for:
- Product: AI writing assistant
- Current customers: Mix of freelancers and enterprises
- Competitors: Jasper, Copy.ai, ChatGPT
Output:
STP Analysis: AI Writing Assistant
PART 1: SEGMENTATION
Market Segmentation Map
PROFESSIONAL USE
│
Enterprise │ Agency
Marketing ────┼──── Teams
│ │ │
Low ──────┼────────────┼─────────┼────── High Tech │ │ │ Tech Savvy │ │ │ Savvy │ │ │ Content ───┼─── Individual Creators │ Professionals │ PERSONAL USE
Segment Profiles
Segment A: Enterprise Marketing Teams
| Attribute | Profile |
|---|---|
| Company size | 500+ employees |
| Department | Marketing, Content |
| Budget | $50K+/year for tools |
| Users | 5-50 per company |
| Need | Scale content, brand consistency |
| Behavior | Long sales cycle, procurement |
Jobs to Be Done:
- Produce more content without more headcount
- Maintain brand voice across team
- Speed up content approval workflows
Pains:
- Content bottleneck at scale
- Inconsistent brand voice
- Slow review/approval cycles
Segment B: Agency Teams
| Attribute | Profile |
|---|---|
| Company size | 10-200 employees |
| Type | Creative, marketing, content agencies |
| Budget | $10-50K/year |
| Users | 5-20 |
| Need | Efficiency, client variety |
| Behavior | Multiple clients, fast turnaround |
Jobs to Be Done:
- Serve more clients without proportional hiring
- Switch between client voices easily
- Draft faster, edit better
Pains:
- Client variety requires context switching
- Margin pressure from fixed-fee projects
- Quality vs. speed tradeoff
Segment C: Individual Professionals
| Attribute | Profile |
|---|---|
| Company size | 1-10 (solopreneurs, SMB) |
| Role | Founders, marketers, content creators |
| Budget | $20-500/month |
| Users | 1-5 |
| Need | Punch above weight |
| Behavior | Fast decision, self-serve |
Jobs to Be Done:
- Write professional content without writing skills
- Produce content volume of larger team
- Save time on first drafts
Pains:
- Limited time for content creation
- Can't afford dedicated writer
- Writer's block, blank page fear
Segment D: Content Creators
| Attribute | Profile |
|---|---|
| Type | Bloggers, YouTubers, course creators |
| Budget | $10-100/month |
| Users | 1 |
| Need | Overcome creative blocks |
| Behavior | Price sensitive, try before buy |
Jobs to Be Done:
- Generate ideas quickly
- Repurpose content across formats
- Maintain publishing cadence
Pains:
- Creative burnout
- Platform algorithm pressure
- Time vs. quality tradeoff
PART 2: TARGETING
Segment Evaluation
| Segment | Size | Growth | Profit | Competition | Fit | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | 8 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 7.4 |
| Agency | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7.4 |
| Individual Pro | 9 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 7.0 |
| Content Creator | 8 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5.2 |
Evaluation Notes:
| Segment | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | High LTV, lower churn | Long sales cycle, complex |
| Agency | Multi-seat, expansion | Price sensitive, churn |
| Individual Pro | Large volume, fast sales | Low ARPU, high support |
| Content Creator | Viral potential | Very low ARPU, high churn |
Recommended Targeting Strategy
Primary Target: Agency Teams
- Best combination of ARPU and accessibility
- Multi-seat expansion opportunity
- Word-of-mouth potential (agencies talk)
- Faster sales cycle than enterprise
Secondary Target: Enterprise Marketing
- Upmarket opportunity
- Higher ARPU offsets longer cycle
- Build case studies for credibility
Serve but don't focus: Individual Professionals
- Self-serve tier drives volume
- Potential upgrade to agency/enterprise
- Lower priority for resources
Deprioritize: Content Creators
- Lowest ARPU, highest churn
- Heavy competition
- Not worth dedicated focus
PART 3: POSITIONING
Competitive Positioning Map
EASE OF USE
│
Simple ─────┼───── Complex │ ┌───────┼────────┐ │ │ Us │ │ ChatGPT (target)│ │ │ │ │ │ Jasper │
GENERIC ─┼───────┼────────┼─ SPECIALIZED │ │ │ │Copy.ai│ │ │ │ │ └───────┴────────┘ │ Basic ─────┴───── Advanced MARKETING FEATURES
Positioning Options
Option 1: Agency Productivity
For marketing agencies Who struggle to scale content without scaling headcount [Product] is the AI writing platform That multiplies your team's output with consistent quality Unlike ChatGPT (generic) or Jasper (solo-focused) We're built for teams serving multiple clients
Option 2: Brand Voice at Scale
For marketing teams managing multiple brands Who need consistent voice across all content [Product] is the AI writing assistant That learns and maintains your brand voice Unlike generic AI tools We sound like you, not like a robot
Option 3: Draft-to-Done Speed
For content professionals under deadline pressure Who spend too much time on first drafts [Product] is the AI writing accelerator That gets you from blank page to publishable 5x faster Unlike basic AI generators We understand marketing, not just language
Recommended Positioning
For Agency Primary Target:
[Product] is the AI content platform for agencies that need to scale without sacrificing quality.
We help agency teams:
- Produce more content with the same team
- Maintain distinct brand voices across clients
- Go from brief to draft in minutes, not hours
Unlike generic AI tools, we're built for teams serving multiple clients—with workspaces, collaboration, and brand voice memory that makes switching contexts seamless.
Positioning Proof Points
| Claim | Proof |
|---|---|
| Scale without hiring | "3x content output with same team" |
| Brand voice consistency | "99% brand voice match" |
| Brief to draft speed | "First draft in 10 minutes" |
| Built for agencies | Multi-client workspace, brand profiles |
Implementation Summary
| Element | Decision |
|---|---|
| Primary segment | Agency Teams |
| Secondary segment | Enterprise Marketing |
| Positioning | AI content platform for agencies |
| Key differentiator | Multi-client, brand voice memory |
| Main proof point | "3x output, same team" |
Example 2: Quick Positioning Assessment
Input:
Assess this positioning: "For busy professionals who want to eat healthy, MealPrep is the meal kit that takes 15 minutes, unlike HelloFresh which takes 30+ minutes."
Output:
Positioning Assessment
Current Statement Analysis
| Element | Current | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Target | Busy professionals | ✅ Clear |
| Need | Want to eat healthy | ✅ Clear |
| Category | Meal kit | ✅ Clear |
| Benefit | 15 minutes | ✅ Specific |
| Competitor | HelloFresh | ✅ Named |
| Differentiator | Time (15 vs 30) | ⚠️ Single dimension |
Strengths
- Clear target segment
- Specific, measurable benefit
- Direct competitive comparison
Weaknesses
- Single differentiator - Time alone is copyable
- "Healthy" undefined - What does healthy mean?
- No emotional benefit - Only functional
- Price not addressed - Key for meal kits
Improved Positioning
For time-strapped professionals who won't compromise on nutrition, MealPrep is the 15-minute meal kit That delivers chef-quality healthy meals Without the prep, cleanup, or guilt Unlike traditional meal kits that feel like a second job We've done the hard work so dinner feels effortless
Key Changes
- Added emotional benefit ("won't compromise")
- Expanded "healthy" to "chef-quality healthy"
- Added cleanup benefit (compounds time savings)
- Emotional framing ("second job" → "effortless")
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
-
Structuring segmentation analysis
-
Evaluating segment attractiveness
-
Developing positioning options
-
Creating positioning statements
What This Skill Cannot Do
-
Research your actual market
-
Know your competitive landscape
-
Validate positioning with customers
-
Guarantee market success
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts:
-
"Segment [market] using [variable]"
-
"Evaluate these segments for targeting"
-
"Develop positioning against [competitor]"
-
"Create messaging for [segment]"
References
-
Philip Kotler - Marketing Management
-
Michael Porter - Competitive Strategy
-
Al Ries & Jack Trout - Positioning
-
Byron Sharp - How Brands Grow
Related Skills
-
positioning
-
April Dunford method
-
competitive-analysis
-
Deep competitive dive
-
icp-matching
-
Customer fit scoring
Skill Metadata
-
Domain: Strategy
-
Complexity: Intermediate
-
Mode: centaur
-
Time to Value: 2-4 hours for full analysis
-
Prerequisites: Market knowledge, customer data