lead-qualification-bant

Lead Qualification: BANT

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "lead-qualification-bant" with this command: npx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills/guia-matthieu-clawfu-skills-lead-qualification-bant

Lead Qualification: BANT

Systematically qualify leads using the BANT framework to identify sales-ready opportunities and prioritize follow-up efforts.

When to Use This Skill

  • Discovery calls with inbound leads

  • Qualifying outbound responses

  • Training SDRs on qualification

  • Building qualification scorecards

  • Improving lead handoff quality

Methodology Foundation

Based on the IBM BANT Framework (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline), modernized with:

  • Consultative discovery approach

  • Scoring-based qualification

  • Flexible question sequencing

  • Modern buying committee awareness

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude Does You Decide

Structures BANT questions Qualification threshold

Scores responses Handoff criteria

Identifies gaps Follow-up approach

Suggests next steps Exception handling

Creates call guides Disqualification rules

Instructions

Step 1: Understand BANT Components

Component Question Why It Matters

Budget Can they afford it? No budget = no deal

Authority Can they decide? Need decision maker

Need Do they need it? Problem = urgency

Timeline When will they decide? Forecasting

Step 2: Design Discovery Questions

Budget Questions:

  • Direct: "What budget have you allocated for this?"

  • Indirect: "How are initiatives like this typically funded?"

  • Value-based: "If we could solve [problem], what would that be worth?"

Authority Questions:

  • "Who else needs to be involved in this decision?"

  • "Walk me through how decisions like this are typically made."

  • "Who signs off on purchases in this range?"

Need Questions:

  • "What prompted you to look into this now?"

  • "What happens if you don't solve this?"

  • "How is this problem affecting [metrics/team/goals]?"

Timeline Questions:

  • "When are you hoping to have a solution in place?"

  • "What's driving that timeline?"

  • "What needs to happen before a decision can be made?"

Step 3: Score Each Component

Score Criteria

3 Strong - Clear, confirmed

2 Moderate - Indicated but not confirmed

1 Weak - Vague or unclear

0 None - Not present or disqualifying

Qualification Threshold:

  • 10-12: Sales-ready (SQL)

  • 7-9: Needs development (MQL)

  • <7: Not qualified (Nurture/Disqualify)

Examples

Example 1: Discovery Call Guide

Output:

BANT Discovery Call Guide

Call Structure (30 minutes)

PhaseTimeFocus
Opener3 minRapport, agenda
Context5 minSituation questions
Need8 minProblem discovery
Authority5 minDecision process
Budget4 minInvestment capacity
Timeline3 minDecision timing
Wrap-up2 minNext steps

Opening Script

"Thanks for taking the time, [Name]. Before we dive in, I'd love to understand what's happening on your end so I can make this as useful as possible for you.

I'll ask some questions to understand your situation, and you can ask me anything about [Company/Product]. Sound good?

What prompted you to take this call today?"


Need Discovery

Situation Questions:

  • "Tell me about your current [process/tool/approach]."
  • "How long have you been doing it this way?"
  • "How many people/deals/projects does this affect?"

Problem Questions:

  • "What's the biggest challenge you're facing with [area]?"
  • "How is that impacting [team/revenue/efficiency]?"
  • "What have you tried to solve this?"

Implication Questions:

  • "What happens if this doesn't get solved this year?"
  • "How does this affect your ability to [hit goals]?"
  • "What's the cost of the status quo?"

Scoring Need:

SignalScore
Clear, urgent problem with measurable impact3
Problem acknowledged, some urgency2
Problem exists but low priority1
No clear problem or "just looking"0

Authority Discovery

Questions:

  • "Who else would need to be involved in evaluating a solution like this?"
  • "Walk me through how you've made similar decisions in the past."
  • "If you decided to move forward, what would the approval process look like?"
  • "Is there anyone who could block or slow down this decision?"

Follow-up mapping:

  • "Besides yourself, who would use this day-to-day?"
  • "Who would need to sign off on the budget?"
  • "Is there a procurement or legal review process?"

Scoring Authority:

SignalScore
Economic buyer, can sign contract3
Key influencer, direct access to buyer2
User/evaluator, no budget control1
No influence, wrong contact0

Budget Discovery

Soft Questions (Start Here):

  • "How are initiatives like this typically funded—is it department budget, or does it come from elsewhere?"
  • "Have you set aside budget for solving [problem] this year?"
  • "When you've purchased [similar solutions] before, how did the funding work?"

Direct Questions (If Appropriate):

  • "What budget range are you working with?"
  • "Our solutions typically range from $X to $Y—does that align with your expectations?"
  • "Is budget already approved, or is that part of the process?"

Value-Based (If Hesitant):

  • "If we could save you [X hours/dollars/etc], what would that be worth to the business?"
  • "What's the cost of not solving this problem?"

Scoring Budget:

SignalScore
Budget allocated, confirmed range3
Budget not set but path to funding clear2
"We'd need to find budget"1
No budget, no path to funding0

Timeline Discovery

Questions:

  • "When are you hoping to have a solution in place?"
  • "What's driving that timeline?"
  • "Is there an event or deadline that's creating urgency?"
  • "What needs to happen between now and a decision?"

Red Flags:

  • "No rush" / "Just exploring"
  • "Maybe next year"
  • "We'll see how this goes"

Green Flags:

  • Specific date or quarter
  • External event driving urgency
  • Already evaluated competitors

Scoring Timeline:

SignalScore
Decision within 30 days, specific date3
Decision within 90 days, general timeline2
"This quarter" or "this year"1
"No timeline" or "just exploring"0

Wrap-Up & Next Steps

If Qualified (Score 10+): "Based on what you've shared, I think there's a strong fit here. Here's what I'd suggest as next steps:

  1. [Schedule demo with AE]
  2. [Send relevant case study]
  3. [Intro to additional stakeholders]

Does that work for you?"

If Needs Development (Score 7-9): "I appreciate your time today. It sounds like [summarize situation].

Before we move forward, it might make sense to [address gap]. Would it help if I [offer value]?

Let's reconnect in [timeframe] to see where things stand."

If Not Qualified (Score <7): "Thanks for the conversation. Based on what you've shared, it sounds like [timing/budget/need] might not be right for a deeper evaluation right now.

I'm going to add you to our newsletter so you stay in the loop, and I'll check back in [timeframe].

Sound good?"

Example 2: Lead Scoring

Input:

Score this discovery call:

Lead: Sarah, VP of Sales at TechCorp (200 employees, B2B SaaS)

Call notes:

  • They're struggling with sales forecasting accuracy
  • Current process: spreadsheets, very manual
  • Problem: missed quarters twice last year
  • Sarah said "This is one of my top 3 priorities"
  • Budget: "We have money set aside, around $30-40K"
  • Decision: Sarah + CEO would need to approve
  • Timeline: Want something in place by end of Q1
  • Also evaluating one competitor

Output:

BANT Qualification Score: Sarah @ TechCorp

Overall Score: 11/12 ⭐ SALES QUALIFIED


Component Breakdown

Need: 3/3 ✅

Evidence:

  • Specific problem: forecasting accuracy
  • Measurable impact: missed quarters twice
  • Priority confirmed: "top 3 priorities"
  • Current solution: manual spreadsheets (pain point)

Assessment: Clear, urgent, quantifiable need.


Authority: 3/3 ✅

Evidence:

  • VP of Sales = key decision maker
  • Identified CEO as co-decider
  • No mention of procurement blockers

Assessment: Strong authority. Champion and economic buyer access.


Budget: 3/3 ✅

Evidence:

  • Budget explicitly set aside
  • Range provided: $30-40K
  • Indicates planning and approval

Assessment: Confirmed budget, specific range, ready to purchase.


Timeline: 2/3 ⚠️

Evidence:

  • "End of Q1" = specific deadline
  • Evaluating competitor = active process
  • But: Q1 could be 3-4 months out

Assessment: Good timeline but not immediate. Slight risk of delay.


Qualification Summary

ComponentScoreStatus
Need3/3✅ Strong
Authority3/3✅ Strong
Budget3/3✅ Strong
Timeline2/3⚠️ Good
Total11/12SQL

Recommendation

Status: Sales Qualified Lead (SQL)

Handoff Notes for AE:

  • Strong pain point: forecasting failures costing them quarters
  • Budget confirmed at $30-40K
  • Key stakeholders: Sarah (VP Sales) + CEO
  • Timeline: EOQ1 (track for potential slip)
  • Competition: 1 competitor being evaluated

Suggested Next Steps:

  1. Immediately warm handoff to AE
  2. Schedule demo within 48 hours
  3. Send forecasting case study
  4. Identify CEO meeting opportunity

Risk to Monitor:

  • Timeline could slip if Q1 pressure eases
  • Competitor evaluation ongoing—need to differentiate

Handoff Email Template

Subject: SQL Handoff: TechCorp - Sarah (VP Sales)

Hi [AE],

Qualified lead ready for you:

Account: TechCorp (200 employees, B2B SaaS) Contact: Sarah, VP of Sales BANT Score: 11/12

Key Points:

  • Problem: Missed 2 quarters due to bad forecasting

  • Current: Manual spreadsheets

  • Budget: $30-40K set aside

  • Timeline: End of Q1

  • Decision: Sarah + CEO

  • Competition: Evaluating 1 competitor

Why They'll Buy: This is a "top 3 priority" per Sarah. They have budget, authority, and urgency. Main risk is timeline slip.

Suggested Approach: Lead with forecasting accuracy story. Ask to meet CEO early.

[Your calendar link for warm intro call]

— [SDR Name]

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Structuring qualification calls

  • Scoring leads objectively

  • Identifying qualification gaps

  • Creating handoff documentation

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Replace conversation skills

  • Know your specific thresholds

  • Handle objections in real-time

  • Guarantee lead quality

References

  • IBM BANT Original Framework

  • TOPO SDR Qualification Guide

  • Gartner B2B Buying Research

  • SalesHacker Discovery Call Guide

Related Skills

  • lead-qualification-meddic

  • Enterprise qualification

  • icp-matching

  • Pre-call fit assessment

  • outbound-sequencer

  • Pre-qualification outreach

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: SDR Automation

  • Complexity: Beginner-Intermediate

  • Mode: cyborg

  • Time to Value: 30 min per call

  • Prerequisites: Basic discovery skills

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

whisper-transcription

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

design-trends-2026

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

social-listening

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

web-scraper

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review