CRM Hygiene
Systematically identify and resolve data quality issues in your CRM to improve forecast accuracy, reporting, and automation reliability.
When to Use This Skill
-
Quarterly CRM audits
-
Before major reporting periods
-
When automation workflows fail
-
After team changes or migrations
-
Preparing for CRM integrations
Methodology Foundation
Based on Salesforce Data Quality Best Practices and RevOps Co-op Data Governance frameworks, focusing on:
-
Completeness (required fields populated)
-
Consistency (standardized values)
-
Accuracy (correct and current data)
-
Timeliness (recent updates)
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
Claude Does You Decide
Defines audit criteria Which fields are required
Identifies data issues Priority of fixes
Categorizes problems by type Who owns cleanup tasks
Suggests remediation steps Automation vs manual fix
Creates cleanup reports Enforcement policies
What This Skill Does
-
Audit design - Define required fields and validation rules
-
Issue identification - Find missing, inconsistent, duplicate data
-
Prioritization - Rank issues by business impact
-
Remediation planning - Action steps to fix issues
-
Governance recommendations - Prevent future issues
How to Use
For Audit Design:
Help me create a CRM hygiene audit for [CRM System].
Key objects to audit:
- [Leads, Contacts, Accounts, Opportunities]
Critical fields for each:
- Leads: [list required fields]
- Opportunities: [list required fields]
Our main issues:
- [Describe known problems]
For Data Audit:
Audit this opportunity data for hygiene issues:
[Paste export or describe data]
Required fields:
- [List fields that must be populated]
Validation rules:
- [List rules like "Stage must match Amount > $0"]
Instructions
Step 1: Define Audit Scope
Object Priority (typical):
-
Opportunities - Revenue impact
-
Accounts - Relationship foundation
-
Contacts - Communication accuracy
-
Leads - Pipeline source
Field Categories:
-
Critical - Blocks processes if missing
-
Important - Affects reporting/segmentation
-
Nice-to-Have - Enriches but not required
Step 2: Completeness Audit
Check required fields by object:
Opportunities:
Field Criticality Why Required
Amount Critical Forecast, pipeline value
Close Date Critical Forecast timing
Stage Critical Pipeline reporting
Owner Critical Accountability
Account Critical Company linkage
Primary Contact Important Communication
Next Step Important Deal momentum
Competitor Important Win/loss analysis
Loss Reason Critical (if lost) Improvement insights
Accounts:
Field Criticality Why Required
Industry Important Segmentation
Employee Count Important ICP fit
Website Important Research, enrichment
Billing Address Critical Invoicing
Account Owner Critical Accountability
Step 3: Consistency Audit
Check for standardization issues:
Issue Type Example Impact
Picklist variations "US" vs "USA" vs "United States" Reporting breaks
Case inconsistency "ACME" vs "Acme" vs "acme" Duplicates
Format variations "(555) 123-4567" vs "5551234567" Automation fails
Null vs blank NULL vs "" vs "N/A" Filters don't work
Step 4: Accuracy Audit
Identify likely incorrect data:
Check Criteria Action
Stale close dates Past date, still open Update or close
Amount mismatches $0 in late stage Verify pricing
Stage regression Stage 4 → Stage 2 Investigate
Impossible values 200% probability Fix validation
Bounced emails Marked invalid Remove or update
Step 5: Duplicate Detection
Find potential duplicates:
Match Type Criteria Confidence
Exact email Same email address 99% duplicate
Domain match Same company domain 80% duplicate
Fuzzy name Similar company name Investigate
Phone match Same phone number 90% duplicate
Step 6: Timeliness Audit
Flag stale records:
Object Staleness Threshold Action
Open Opportunity No activity 30 days Review with rep
Lead No touch 14 days Reassign or nurture
Account No contact 90 days Re-engagement
Contact Bounced + 30 days Archive
Examples
Example 1: Opportunity Audit
Input:
Audit these opportunities:
- Acme Corp - Stage: Proposal, Amount: $0, Close: Jan 15 (past), Owner: Empty
- Beta Inc - Stage: Closed Won, Amount: $50K, Close: Feb 1, Loss Reason: "Price"
- Gamma LLC - Stage: Discovery, Amount: $100K, Close: Mar 30, No activity 45 days
- Delta Co - Stage: Negotiation, Amount: $75K, Close: Feb 28, Next Step: Empty
- Echo Systems - Stage: Closed Lost, Amount: $200K, Loss Reason: Empty
Output:
CRM Hygiene Audit: Opportunities
Summary
- Total Records: 5
- Critical Issues: 4
- Warnings: 2
- Clean Records: 0
Critical Issues (Fix Immediately)
1. Acme Corp - 3 Critical Issues
| Issue | Field | Current | Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Missing | Owner | Empty | Assigned rep |
| 🔴 Missing | Amount | $0 | Deal value |
| 🔴 Stale | Close Date | Jan 15 (past) | Future date |
Action: Assign owner, verify if deal is active, update amount and close date.
2. Beta Inc - Logic Error
| Issue | Field | Current | Problem |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Inconsistent | Loss Reason | "Price" | Stage is "Closed Won" |
Action: Either change stage to Closed Lost, or clear Loss Reason.
3. Echo Systems - Missing Required
| Issue | Field | Current | Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Missing | Loss Reason | Empty | Required for Closed Lost |
Action: Rep must document why deal was lost.
4. Delta Co - Missing Next Step
| Issue | Field | Current | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟠 Missing | Next Step | Empty | No clear action |
Action: Rep should define next step for Negotiation stage.
Warnings (Review This Week)
5. Gamma LLC - Stale Deal
| Issue | Indicator | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 🟡 Stale | Last Activity | 45 days ago |
Action: Review with rep - is this deal still active? If yes, update. If no, close lost.
Hygiene Score: 20/100 (Poor)
Recommended Actions by Priority
- Today: Fix Acme Corp (no owner = orphaned deal)
- Today: Fix Beta Inc logic error (affects win rate)
- This Week: Get Echo Systems loss reason
- This Week: Update Gamma LLC status
- This Week: Add Delta Co next step
Process Recommendations
- Add validation rule: Amount required when Stage > Discovery
- Add validation rule: Owner required on all opportunities
- Add validation rule: Loss Reason required when Closed Lost
- Create stale deal report (no activity 30+ days)
Example 2: Duplicate Detection
Input:
Check these accounts for duplicates:
- Acme Corporation, acme.com, San Francisco
- ACME Corp, acme.com, SF
- Acme Inc, acme-inc.com, San Francisco
- Beta Technologies, beta.io, New York
- Beta Tech, betatech.com, NYC
- Beta Technologies Inc, beta.io, New York
Output:
Duplicate Detection Report
High Confidence Duplicates (Merge)
Duplicate Set 1: Acme Corporation
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Acme Corporation | acme.com | San Francisco | Master |
| #2 | ACME Corp | acme.com | SF | 99% - Same domain |
Recommendation: Merge #2 into #1
- Same domain (acme.com)
- Same location (SF = San Francisco)
- Name variation only (Corp vs Corporation)
Duplicate Set 2: Beta Technologies
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #4 | Beta Technologies | beta.io | New York | Master |
| #6 | Beta Technologies Inc | beta.io | New York | 99% - Same domain |
Recommendation: Merge #6 into #4
- Same domain (beta.io)
- Same location (New York)
- Name variation only (Inc suffix)
Investigate (Possible Duplicates)
Possible Set 1: Acme variations
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Acme Corporation | acme.com | San Francisco | - |
| #3 | Acme Inc | acme-inc.com | San Francisco | 40% |
Recommendation: Investigate manually
- Same location, similar name
- BUT different domains (acme.com vs acme-inc.com)
- Could be: subsidiary, different company, or typo
Possible Set 2: Beta variations
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #4 | Beta Technologies | beta.io | New York | - |
| #5 | Beta Tech | betatech.com | NYC | 50% |
Recommendation: Investigate manually
- Same location (NYC = New York)
- Similar names (Beta Tech vs Beta Technologies)
- Different domains - likely different companies
Summary
- Definite Duplicates: 2 sets (4 records → 2)
- Possible Duplicates: 2 sets (need research)
- Unique Records: Pending investigation
Merge Checklist
Before merging, verify:
- All opportunities moved to master record
- All contacts linked to master
- Activity history preserved
- Custom fields compared
- Integration IDs noted (for external systems)
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
-
Defining audit criteria systematically
-
Identifying common data quality issues
-
Prioritizing fixes by business impact
-
Creating actionable remediation plans
What This Skill Cannot Do
-
Access your actual CRM data
-
Execute cleanup automatically
-
Know your specific business rules
-
Detect all semantic errors
When to Escalate to Human
-
Merge decisions (data loss risk)
-
Business rule definitions
-
Enforcement policy decisions
-
Cross-object relationship issues
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts
-
"Create a monthly hygiene report template."
-
"What validation rules would prevent these issues?"
-
"Prioritize the top 10 issues by revenue impact."
-
"Design a data entry form that enforces these rules."
Continuous Improvement Cycle
-
Audit → Identify issues
-
Fix → Clean data
-
Prevent → Add validation rules
-
Monitor → Track hygiene score weekly
-
Iterate → Refine rules quarterly
Checklists & Templates
Weekly Hygiene Report Template
CRM Hygiene Report - Week of [Date]
Hygiene Score: X/100
Critical Issues (Fix Today)
| Object | Record | Issue | Owner |
|---|
Warnings (Fix This Week)
| Object | Count | Issue Type |
|---|
Trends
- Issues closed this week: X
- New issues this week: X
- Net change: +/- X
Action Items
Data Governance Checklist
-
Required fields defined per object
-
Validation rules implemented
-
Duplicate rules active
-
Stale record reports scheduled
-
Ownership assignments current
-
Integration mappings documented
References
-
Salesforce Data Quality Best Practices
-
RevOps Co-op Data Governance Framework
-
Marketo Database Health Guide
-
Gartner Data Quality Market Guide
Related Skills
-
pipeline-forecasting
-
Clean data improves forecasts
-
lead-scoring
-
Requires complete lead data
-
deal-risk-scoring
-
Depends on activity data
Skill Metadata
-
Domain: RevOps
-
Complexity: Intermediate
-
Mode: centaur
-
Time to Value: 30-60 min for audit, varies for cleanup
-
Prerequisites: CRM data export, field requirements list