github_bug_fix:rca

Root Cause Analysis: GitHub Issue #$ARGUMENTS

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "github_bug_fix:rca" with this command: npx skills add giladresisi/ai-dev-env/giladresisi-ai-dev-env-github-bug-fix-rca

Root Cause Analysis: GitHub Issue #$ARGUMENTS

Objective

Investigate GitHub issue #$ARGUMENTS from this repository, identify the root cause, and document findings for future implementation.

Prerequisites:

  • Working in a local Git repository with GitHub origin

  • GitHub CLI installed and authenticated (gh auth status )

  • Valid GitHub issue ID from this repository

Investigation Process

  1. Fetch GitHub Issue Details

Use GitHub CLI to retrieve issue information:

gh issue view $ARGUMENTS

This fetches:

  • Issue title and description

  • Reporter and creation date

  • Labels and status

  • Comments and discussion

  1. Search Codebase

Identify relevant code:

  • Search for components mentioned in issue

  • Find related functions, classes, or modules

  • Check similar implementations

  • Look for patterns or recent changes

Use grep/search to find:

  • Error messages from issue

  • Related function names

  • Component identifiers

  1. Review Recent History

Check recent changes to affected areas: !git log --oneline -20 -- [relevant-paths]

Look for:

  • Recent modifications to affected code

  • Related bug fixes

  • Refactorings that might have introduced the issue

  1. Investigate Root Cause

Analyze the code to determine:

  • What is the actual bug or issue?

  • Why is it happening?

  • What was the original intent?

  • Is this a logic error, edge case, or missing validation?

  • Are there related issues or symptoms?

Consider:

  • Input validation failures

  • Edge cases not handled

  • Race conditions or timing issues

  • Incorrect assumptions

  • Missing error handling

  • Integration issues between components

  1. Assess Impact

Determine:

  • How widespread is this issue?

  • What features are affected?

  • Are there workarounds?

  • What is the severity?

  • Could this cause data corruption or security issues?

  1. Propose Fix Approach

Design the solution:

  • What needs to be changed?

  • Which files will be modified?

  • What is the fix strategy?

  • Are there alternative approaches?

  • What testing is needed?

  • Are there any risks or side effects?

Output: Create RCA Document

Save analysis as: docs/rca/issue-$ARGUMENTS.md

Required RCA Document Structure

Root Cause Analysis: GitHub Issue #$ARGUMENTS

Issue Summary

  • GitHub Issue ID: #$ARGUMENTS
  • Issue URL: [Link to GitHub issue]
  • Title: [Issue title from GitHub]
  • Reporter: [GitHub username]
  • Severity: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
  • Status: [Current GitHub issue status]

Problem Description

[Clear description of the issue]

Expected Behavior: [What should happen]

Actual Behavior: [What actually happens]

Symptoms:

  • [List observable symptoms]

Reproduction

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. [Step 1]
  2. [Step 2]
  3. [Observe issue]

Reproduction Verified: [Yes/No]

Root Cause

Affected Components

  • Files: [List of affected files with paths]
  • Functions/Classes: [Specific code locations]
  • Dependencies: [Any external deps involved]

Analysis

[Detailed explanation of the root cause]

Why This Occurs: [Explanation of the underlying issue]

Code Location:

[File path:line number] [Relevant code snippet showing the issue]

Related Issues

  • [Any related issues or patterns]

Impact Assessment

Scope:

  • [How widespread is this?]

Affected Features:

  • [List affected features]

Severity Justification: [Why this severity level]

Data/Security Concerns: [Any data corruption or security implications]

Proposed Fix

Fix Strategy

[High-level approach to fixing]

Files to Modify

  1. [file-path]

    • Changes: [What needs to change]
    • Reason: [Why this change fixes it]
  2. [file-path]

    • Changes: [What needs to change]
    • Reason: [Why this change fixes it]

Alternative Approaches

[Other possible solutions and why the proposed approach is better]

Risks and Considerations

  • [Any risks with this fix]
  • [Side effects to watch for]
  • [Breaking changes if any]

Testing Requirements

Test Cases Needed:

  1. [Test case 1 - verify fix works]
  2. [Test case 2 - verify no regression]
  3. [Test case 3 - edge cases]

Validation Commands:

[Exact commands to verify fix]

Implementation Plan

[Brief overview of implementation steps]

This RCA document should be used by /implement-fix
 command.

Next Steps

- Review this RCA document

- Run: /implement-fix $ARGUMENTS
 to implement the fix

- Run: /commit
 after implementation complete

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

acceptance-criteria-validate

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

explore-api

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

cleanup-progress

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review