plain-language

Reviews project text — documentation, READMEs, marketing copy, UI strings, code comments, error messages — for compliance with the U.S. federal government Plain Language Guidelines. Produces structured edit recommendations with concrete rewrites. Activates on plain language review, readability check, copy audit, "make this clearer," or "improve the writing."

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "plain-language" with this command: npx skills add ggwicz/skills/ggwicz-skills-plain-language

Plain Language Review

Review text files against the U.S. federal government Plain Language Guidelines (~30 rules across 6 categories) and produce a structured report of findings with concrete rewrites.

Important: This skill produces a report. Do not modify any reviewed files.


Review Workflow

  1. Select files — Use the user's specified files. If none specified, run scripts/scan-plaintext-files.sh <project-directory> to discover all .md, .mdx, .markdown, .txt, .rtf, .rst, .adoc, .org, and .wiki files. The <project-directory> argument is required — it must be the root of the user's project (the repository being reviewed), NOT the skill's own directory.
  2. Load rules — Read references/rules-quick-ref.md for the full rule checklist.
  3. Review each file — For each file, read it and apply all rules. Skip text inside code blocks/fences, inline code, and code-only files. Only review human-readable prose.
  4. Generate findings — For each issue found, produce a finding using the Output Format below.
  5. Classify severity — Use references/severity-rubric.md to assign high/medium/low.
  6. Verify rewrites — For each suggested rewrite, confirm it resolves the flagged rule violation and does not introduce new violations. If a rewrite still triggers the same or a different rule, revise it before including it in the report.
  7. Assemble report — Write findings to plain-language-findings-YYYYMMDD.md in the project root (use today's date). Group findings by file, then by severity (high first). End with the summary block.

Output Format

Use this exact structure for each finding:

## [file path]

### Finding [N] — [Rule name] (severity: [high|medium|low])
- **Line [N]:** "[original text]"
- **Guideline:** [One-sentence explanation of the rule violated]
- **Suggested:** "[concrete rewrite]"

Example:

## docs/getting-started.md

### Finding 1 — Use simple words (severity: medium)
- **Line 14:** "In order to utilize the configuration module..."
- **Guideline:** Replace complex words with simple alternatives — "utilize" → "use", "in order to" → "to"
- **Suggested:** "To use the configuration module..."

### Finding 2 — Use active voice (severity: high)
- **Line 23:** "The database will be initialized by the setup script."
- **Guideline:** Make the actor the subject of the sentence
- **Suggested:** "The setup script initializes the database."

If a file has no findings, omit it from the report entirely — do not list it.

End the report with a summary:

## Summary
- **Files reviewed:** [N]
- **Total findings:** [N] ([N] high, [N] medium, [N] low)
- **Top issues:** [List the 2-3 most frequent rule violations]

When to Load Reference Files

Load references on demand to conserve context:

FileWhen to load
references/rules-quick-ref.mdAlways — load at start of every review
references/word-substitutions.mdWhen checking word choice or when you encounter a word that might have a simpler alternative
references/active-voice-guide.mdWhen you detect passive voice patterns (forms of "to be" + past participle)
references/before-and-after-examples.mdWhen crafting suggested rewrites — use as transformation models
references/severity-rubric.mdWhen classifying findings — consult definitions and examples

Scope Rules

  • Review: prose in .md, .mdx, .markdown, .txt, .rtf, .rst, .adoc, .org, .wiki files; comments in source code files; UI strings; error messages
  • Skip: code inside fences/backticks, variable names, import statements, configuration values, URLs, file paths
  • Preserve technical terms — flag jargon only when a simpler alternative exists without losing precision
  • Do not modify reviewed files — produce recommendations only

Attribution

The plain language guidelines and examples referenced by this skill originate from the U.S. federal government's Plain Language initiative, maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA). All guideline content is U.S. government work in the public domain. Source: https://digital.gov/guides/plain-language

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

code-hygiene

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Security

Skill Safe Install

L0 级技能安全安装流程。触发“安装技能/安全安装/审查权限”时,强制执行 Step0-5(查重→检索→审查→沙箱→正式安装→白名单)。

Registry SourceRecently Updated
3800Profile unavailable
Security

Skill Hunter

Find, evaluate, and install ClawHub skills. Semantic search across 10,000+ skills, security vetting before install, side-by-side comparison. The skill that m...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
5192Profile unavailable
Security

audit-website

Audit websites for SEO, performance, security, technical, content, and 15 other issue cateories with 230+ rules using the squirrelscan CLI. Returns LLM-optimized reports with health scores, broken links, meta tag analysis, and actionable recommendations. Use to discover and asses website or webapp issues and health.

Repository Source