When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Create Custom Lightning Types (CLTs) for structured inputs/outputs
- Generate JSON Schema-based type definitions for Lightning Platform
- Configure CLTs for Einstein Agent actions
- Set up editor and renderer configurations for custom UI
- Troubleshoot deployment errors related to Custom Lightning Types
Specification
CustomLightningType Metadata Specification
Overview & Purpose
Custom Lightning Types (CLTs) are JSON Schema-based type definitions used by the Lightning Platform (including Einstein Agent actions) to describe structured inputs/outputs and drive editor/renderer experiences.
Configuration
- Choose referenced CLT pattern for nested objects - When you need a reusable or separately deployed nested type, create a CLT for that shape and reference it with
"lightning:type": "c__<CLTName>". That string is the referenced type’slightning:typevalue / FQN / registered identifier — not the JSON Schematitle. - Choose standard Lightning types when the structure is simple and can be expressed with properties and supported primitive
lightning:typeidentifiers. - Choose Apex class types (
@apexClassType/...) when the structure already exists server-side and you want the Apex class to define the shape. - Include editor/renderer config only when you need custom UI behavior (custom LWC input/output components). Otherwise, omit.
Critical Rules (Read First)
- Root object schemas MUST include:
"type": "object""title""lightning:type": "lightning__objectType""unevaluatedProperties": false
"unevaluatedProperties"is enforced asfalseby the CLT metaschema. Do not set it totrue.- Root object schemas MUST NOT include
"examples"when"unevaluatedProperties": falseis set. - Nested objects (inside
properties) MUST NOT set"lightning:type": "lightning__objectType".- Nested objects can be: references to other CLTs using
c__<CLTName>syntax.
- Nested objects can be: references to other CLTs using
- List/array properties are highly restricted by the CLT metaschema:
- CRITICAL LIMITATION: the CLT metaschema may reject the
itemskeyword entirely. Treatitemsas disallowed by default. - Root-level arrays (direct children of the root
properties):- MUST include
"lightning:type": "lightning__listType" - MUST NOT include
"items" - OPTIONAL
"type": "array"
- MUST include
- Nested arrays (arrays inside nested objects) are the most common failure:
- MUST include
"type": "array" - MUST NOT include
"lightning:type": "lightning__listType" - MUST NOT include
"items"
- MUST include
- CRITICAL LIMITATION: the CLT metaschema may reject the
- When
"unevaluatedProperties": falseis set, any unknown keyword will fail validation. Prefer removing keywords over relaxing strictness. - Apex class CLTs are minimal:
- Include only
title,description(optional), andlightning:typeset to@apexClassType/.... - Do not add
type,properties,required, orunevaluatedProperties.
- Include only
Additional CLT Metaschema Validations
- Org namespace validation: titles/descriptions and other string fields may be validated to ensure you are not using an org namespace in places that are disallowed.
- Lightning type validation: CLTs are validated to prevent referencing internal namespaces (for example, disallowing types from internal namespaces like
sfdc_cmswhere not permitted). - Object type validation: the CLT root is validated to ensure
lightning:typeis exactlylightning__objectType.
Primitive Types & Constraints
lightning__textType- Max length 255
lightning__multilineTextType- Max length 2000
lightning__richTextType- Max length 100000
lightning__urlType- Max length 2000
- Optional
lightning:allowedUrlSchemesenum values:https,http,relative,mailto,tel
lightning__dateType- Data pattern: YYYY-MM-DD
lightning__timeType- Data pattern: HH:MM:SS.sssZ
lightning__dateTimeType- Data shape is an object with required
dateTimeand optionaltimeZone
- Data shape is an object with required
lightning__numberType- Decimal numbers; optional
maximum,minimum,multipleOf
- Decimal numbers; optional
lightning__integerType- Whole numbers only; optional
maximum,minimum
- Whole numbers only; optional
lightning__booleanType- true/false
Allowed Property-Level Keywords
When strict validation is enabled (unevaluatedProperties: false), keep each property minimal and prefer only keywords known to be allowed:
title,description,einstein:descriptiontype(when used, ensure it matches the chosenlightning:type)lightning:typemaximum,minimum,multipleOf(numeric)maxLength,minLength(string)const,enumlightning:textIndexed,lightning:supportsPersonalization,lightning:localizablelightning:uiOptions,lightning:allowedUrlSchemeslightning:tags(metaschema restricts values; currentlyflowis the only known allowed tag)
Generation Workflow
- Confirm the CLT approach
- If referencing Apex: capture the exact class reference (
@apexClassType/namespace__ClassName$InnerClass). - If using standard primitives: list the fields, their Lightning primitive types, and which fields are required.
- If referencing Apex: capture the exact class reference (
- Draft
schema.json- Start with the root object structure (required root fields).
- Add
propertiesusing valid primitivelightning:typeidentifiers. - For nested-object properties, use CLT Reference pattern:
"lightning:type": "c__<CLTName>"to reference another CLT- The referenced CLT must be deployed to the org before the parent CLT.
- For Apex-based nested objects: Use
@apexClassType/...when structure exists server-side. - If the prompt explicitly requires true nested object output, prefer an Apex-based CLT (
@apexClassType/...) for deploy-safe nested structures. - For arrays: follow the strict list rules (avoid
items; avoidlightning:typeon nested arrays). - Before deployment, verify exact
lightning:typespellings (for example, uselightning__richTextType, not misspelled variants).
- (Optional) Draft
editor.json(only if custom UI is required)- Supported shape: Top-level
editorobject witheditor.componentOverridesandeditor.layout.- Top-level
editorobject. - Use
editor.componentOverridesfor component overrides. - Use
editor.layoutfor layout. - DEPRECATED: Do NOT use
propertyRenderersorview— these are legacy keys. Always usecomponentOverridesandlayoutinstead.
- Top-level
- Root override pattern (most common for fully custom editing UI):
editor.componentOverrides["$"] = { "definition": "c/<yourEditorComponent>", "attributes": { ... } }- When passing schema data into a custom LWC, use attribute mapping with the
{!$attrs.<name>}syntax: e.g."attributes": { "myField": "{!$attrs.value}" }so the runtime binds schema values to your component's attributes. - CRITICAL: The
<name>in{!$attrs.<name>}must be a property defined in your type schema. For example, if your schema has a property calledtemperature, use{!$attrs.temperature}, not{!$attrs.value}unlessvalueis an actual property.
- Property-level override pattern (for individual fields):
editor.componentOverrides["<propertyName>"] = { "definition": "es_property_editors/<...>" }- Valid editor components (examples):
es_property_editors/inputText,es_property_editors/inputNumber,es_property_editors/inputRichText,es_property_editors/inputImage,es_property_editors/inputTextarea. Do not usees_property_editors/inputList.
- Collection editor (for root-level
lightning__listTypeproperties): Use a collection-level override so the list is edited by a custom component:collection.editor.componentOverrides["$"] = { "definition": "c/<yourCollectionEditorComponent>" }. Alternatively, useeditor.layoutwithlightning/propertyLayoutandattributes.property = "<listPropertyName>"for default list editing. - Layout pattern:
editor.layout.definition = "lightning/verticalLayout"editor.layout.children[*].definition = "lightning/propertyLayout"withattributes.property = "<propertyName>"- CRITICAL:
lightning/propertyLayoutonly accepts thepropertyattribute. Do NOT addlabel,title, or any other attributes — these will fail validation withadditionalProperties: falseerrors.
- Avoid known-invalid patterns:
- Do not use
es_property_editors/inputList. - Do not use
itemSchemaattributes.
- Do not use
- Supported shape: Top-level
- (Optional) Draft
renderer.json(only if custom UI is required)- Supported shape: Top-level
rendererobject withrenderer.componentOverridesandrenderer.layout.- Top-level
rendererobject. - Use
renderer.componentOverridesfor component overrides. - Use
renderer.layoutfor layout. - DEPRECATED: Do NOT use
propertyRenderersorview— these are legacy keys. Always usecomponentOverridesandlayoutinstead.
- Top-level
- Root override pattern (most common for fully custom rendering UI):
renderer.componentOverrides["$"] = { "definition": "c/<yourRendererComponent>", "attributes": { ... } }- Use
{!$attrs.<name>}in attribute mappings when binding schema data to custom renderer component attributes. - CRITICAL: Attribute mappings like
{!$attrs.propertyName}must reference properties that actually exist in your type schema. Referencing non-existent properties will fail validation. - Type matching: Attribute values must match the expected type for the component. For example, if a component expects a string attribute, passing an integer will fail validation.
- Property-level override pattern:
renderer.componentOverrides["<propertyName>"] = { "definition": "es_property_editors/outputText" | "es_property_editors/outputNumber" | "es_property_editors/outputImage" | ... }. Valid renderer components (examples):es_property_editors/outputText,es_property_editors/outputNumber,es_property_editors/outputImage. Avoid input-style components in the renderer.
- Layout pattern for renderer:
renderer.layout.definition = "lightning/verticalLayout"renderer.layout.children[*].definition = "lightning/propertyLayout"withattributes.property = "<propertyName>"- CRITICAL: Same as editor layouts,
lightning/propertyLayoutonly accepts thepropertyattribute. Do NOT addlabel,title, or any other attributes.
- Collection renderer (for root-level
lightning__listTypeproperties): Usecollection.renderer.componentOverrides["$"] = { "definition": "c/<yourListRendererComponent>" }ores_property_editors/genericListTypeRendererto render the list.
- Supported shape: Top-level
- Place files in the correct bundle structure
lightningTypes/<TypeName>/schema.json- (Optional)
lightningTypes/<TypeName>/lightningDesktopGenAi/editor.json - (Optional)
lightningTypes/<TypeName>/lightningDesktopGenAi/renderer.json - For Gen AI / Copilot the standard path is
lightningDesktopGenAi/. Other targets (e.g. Experience Builder, Mobile Copilot, Enhanced Web Chat) use different subfolders when supported:experienceBuilder/,lightningMobileGenAi/,enhancedWebChat/.
- Configure custom LWC components (if using custom components)
- CRITICAL: Custom LWC components referenced in editor/renderer configs MUST have the correct target configuration in their
-meta.xmlfiles:- For editor components (
c/<componentName>used ineditor.json): The LWC's-meta.xmlfile must include<target>lightning__AgentforceInput</target> - For renderer components (
c/<componentName>used inrenderer.json): The LWC's-meta.xmlfile must include<target>lightning__AgentforceOutput</target>
- For editor components (
- Without the correct target, deployment will fail with:
Invalid target configuration. To use 'c/componentName' as a renderer/editor, your js-meta.xml file must include valid target 'lightning__AgentforceOutput/Input'. - Example
-meta.xmlfor a renderer component:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <LightningComponentBundle xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata"> <apiVersion>60.0</apiVersion> <isExposed>true</isExposed> <targets> <target>lightning__AgentforceOutput</target> </targets> </LightningComponentBundle>
- CRITICAL: Custom LWC components referenced in editor/renderer configs MUST have the correct target configuration in their
- Deploy and validate
- Run a final schema sanity check before deploy: valid
lightning:typenames, required fields present, and no disallowed keywords. - Deploy the bundle using your org's standard metadata deployment flow (e.g. Salesforce CLI or IDE). The MCP client or tooling in use should provide or integrate with the appropriate deploy/retrieve commands for Lightning Type bundles.
- Validate incrementally: if deployment fails, remove disallowed keywords first (especially
examples,items, nestedlightning:type).
- Run a final schema sanity check before deploy: valid
Common Deployment Errors
| Error / Symptom | Likely Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Schema validation fails due to unknown keyword | unevaluatedProperties: false + disallowed keyword (commonly examples, items) | Remove the offending keyword; keep schema minimal |
| Nested object validation failure | Org/channel validation rejects nested object typing in LightningTypeBundle | Use CLT reference (c__<CLTName>) or Apex class types |
| Invalid CLT reference | Referenced CLT doesn't exist in org or incorrect syntax | Deploy the referenced CLT first; c__<CLTName> must match the referenced type’s lightning:type value / FQN / registered identifier, not title |
Invalid or misspelled lightning:type (for example, lightning__richtextType instead of lightning__richTextType) | Incorrect generated type name | Cross-check all lightning:type values against supported type names and correct them before deployment |
| Array property rejected | Use of items (or lightning:type in nested arrays) rejected by validator | For nested arrays: keep only type: "array". For root arrays: use minimal structure; remove items if rejected |
| Apex-based CLT rejected | Extra fields added (e.g., type, properties) | Use only title, optional description, and lightning:type |
| Editor config rejected | Use of invalid patterns (es_property_editors/inputList, itemSchema) or unrecognized top-level keys | Use editor.componentOverrides and editor.layout; keep config minimal |
additionalProperties error on layout attributes | Adding label or other attributes to lightning/propertyLayout | Only use property attribute in lightning/propertyLayout. Remove label, title, or any other attributes |
| Invalid target configuration for custom LWC | Custom LWC component's -meta.xml missing required target (lightning__AgentforceInput or lightning__AgentforceOutput) | Add correct target to LWC's -meta.xml: use lightning__AgentforceInput for editors, lightning__AgentforceOutput for renderers |
| Attribute mapping doesn't exist in type schema | Using {!$attrs.propertyName} where propertyName is not defined in schema | Ensure all attribute mappings reference actual properties in your type schema's properties section |
additionalProperties error with deprecated keys | Using propertyRenderers or view in editor/renderer config | Replace deprecated propertyRenderers with componentOverrides and view with layout |
| Type mismatch in component attributes | Passing wrong type for component attribute (e.g., integer instead of string) | Ensure attribute values match the expected type defined by the component |
Verification Checklist
- Root schema has
type: "object",title,lightning:type: "lightning__objectType", andunevaluatedProperties: false - Root schema does not include
exampleswhen strict validation is enabled - No nested object includes
lightning:type: "lightning__objectType" - Arrays are defined minimally (especially nested arrays)
- Only supported primitive
lightning:typeidentifiers are used for leaf properties - Apex class CLTs contain only
title/descriptionandlightning:type: "@apexClassType/..." - Bundle structure and filenames match Lightning Types requirements
- Editor config uses only allowed patterns (no
es_property_editors/inputList, noitemSchema); use valid components (e.g.es_property_editors/inputText,es_property_editors/inputNumber) or customc/components - Renderer config uses output-style components (e.g.
es_property_editors/outputText,es_property_editors/outputNumber) where applicable, not input editors - Layout configurations use
lightning/propertyLayoutwith ONLY thepropertyattribute (nolabel,title, or other attributes) - All attribute mappings (
{!$attrs.propertyName}) reference properties that exist in the type schema - Custom LWC components have correct targets in
-meta.xml:lightning__AgentforceInputfor editors,lightning__AgentforceOutputfor renderers